Fengmin Tang1, Guoxing Zhu2, Zheng Jiao3, Chunlai Ma3, Nianzu Chen4, Bin Wang3. 1. Department of Pharmacy, Hospital of Huashan, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Pharmacy, Hospital of Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: tangfengm2008@163.com. 2. Department of Neurology, Hospital of Huashan, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. 3. Department of Pharmacy, Hospital of Huashan, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. 4. Department of Pharmacy, Hospital of Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of medication education and behavioral intervention on Chinese patients with epilepsy and to compare the difference between them. METHODS: A total of 109 patients with epilepsy who did not to take their antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) more than once were randomly assigned to two intervention groups: the medication education group (group I) and the medication education with behavioral intervention group (group II). Group I was initially provided with medication education in the form of oral education and written materials, and this education was reinforced by monthly calls from the pharmacist over the next six months. The behavioral intervention provided to group II consisted of a modified medication schedule which was based on cue-dose training therapy. The outcomes that were evaluated both in the beginning and in the end of the study included adherence, which was measured using the four-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-4), the number of seizures, knowledge of AEDs, and the number of patients who missed a dose of their AEDs. Differences within and between the groups were analyzed. RESULTS: After intervention, the adherence and knowledge of AEDs increased greatly in all patients, and the number of patients who had seizures or missed AEDs decreased. However, no significant differences were observed between groups I and II. The observed changes were (group I vs group II, p value) increased adherence: 62.3% vs 64.3%, 0.827; increased knowledge of AEDs: 88.7% vs 80.4%, 0.231; and improved seizure control: 64.2% vs 64.3%, 0.988. In addition, the percentage of patients who forgot to take their AEDs decreased to 45.0% from more than 70%, and 44.9% of these patients took the missed AEDs as soon as they remembered. DISCUSSION: These findings clearly demonstrate that medication education and reinforced telephone calls from pharmacists can help to increase adherence to AEDs, the knowledge of patients regarding AEDs, and seizure control. However, the inclusion of a behavioral strategy that was easy to administer and use in this program did not lead to any significant effects on improving adherence. The results indicate that pharmacists can play an important role in improving the effects of medication regimens, but further research is required to identify strategies for improving adherence to behavioral theory.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of medication education and behavioral intervention on Chinese patients with epilepsy and to compare the difference between them. METHODS: A total of 109 patients with epilepsy who did not to take their antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) more than once were randomly assigned to two intervention groups: the medication education group (group I) and the medication education with behavioral intervention group (group II). Group I was initially provided with medication education in the form of oral education and written materials, and this education was reinforced by monthly calls from the pharmacist over the next six months. The behavioral intervention provided to group II consisted of a modified medication schedule which was based on cue-dose training therapy. The outcomes that were evaluated both in the beginning and in the end of the study included adherence, which was measured using the four-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-4), the number of seizures, knowledge of AEDs, and the number of patients who missed a dose of their AEDs. Differences within and between the groups were analyzed. RESULTS: After intervention, the adherence and knowledge of AEDs increased greatly in all patients, and the number of patients who had seizures or missed AEDs decreased. However, no significant differences were observed between groups I and II. The observed changes were (group I vs group II, p value) increased adherence: 62.3% vs 64.3%, 0.827; increased knowledge of AEDs: 88.7% vs 80.4%, 0.231; and improved seizure control: 64.2% vs 64.3%, 0.988. In addition, the percentage of patients who forgot to take their AEDs decreased to 45.0% from more than 70%, and 44.9% of these patients took the missed AEDs as soon as they remembered. DISCUSSION: These findings clearly demonstrate that medication education and reinforced telephone calls from pharmacists can help to increase adherence to AEDs, the knowledge of patients regarding AEDs, and seizure control. However, the inclusion of a behavioral strategy that was easy to administer and use in this program did not lead to any significant effects on improving adherence. The results indicate that pharmacists can play an important role in improving the effects of medication regimens, but further research is required to identify strategies for improving adherence to behavioral theory.
Authors: Amy Werremeyer; Jolene Bostwick; Carla Cobb; Tera D Moore; Susie H Park; Cristofer Price; Jerry McKee Journal: Ment Health Clin Date: 2020-11-05
Authors: Mícheál de Barra; Claire L Scott; Neil W Scott; Marie Johnston; Marijn de Bruin; Nancy Nkansah; Christine M Bond; Catriona I Matheson; Pamela Rackow; A Jess Williams; Margaret C Watson Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-09-04