Jonathan D Marhong1, Niall D Ferguson, Jeffrey M Singh. 1. Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 500 University Avenue, Suite 602, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada, jonathan.marhong@medportal.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is common following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), but the influence of mechanical ventilator settings on its development is unclear. We sought to determine adherence to lung protective thresholds in ventilated patients with SAH and describe the association between ventilator settings and subsequent development of ARDS. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients receiving mechanical ventilation within 72 h of SAH at a single academic center. Ventilator settings and blood gas data were collected twice daily for the first 7 days of ventilation along with ICU and hospital outcomes. Lung protective ventilation was defined as follows: tidal volume ≤8 mL/kg of predicted body weight, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ≥5 cm H(2)O, and peak or plateau pressure ≤30 cm H(2)O. The development of ARDS was ascertained retrospectively by PaO(2)/FiO(2) ≤300 with new bilateral lung opacities on chest X-ray within one day of hypoxemia. RESULTS: We identified 62 patients who underwent early mechanical ventilation following SAH. PS and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure were common ventilator modes with a median tidal volume of 7.8 mL/kg [interquartile range 6.8-8.8], median peak pressure of 14 cm H(2)O [IQR 12-17], and median PEEP of 5 cm H(2)O [IQR 5-6]. Adherence to tidal volumes ≤8 mL/kg was seen in 64 % of all observations and peak pressures <30 cm H(2)O were 94 % of all observations. All three lung protective criteria were seen in 58 % of all observations. Thirty-one patients (50 %) were determined to have ARDS. ARDS patients were more frequently ventilated with a peak pressure >30 cm H(2)O (11.3 % of ARDS ventilation days vs. 0 % of non-ARDS ventilation days; p < 0.01). Initial tidal volume was not associated with subsequent development of ARDS in univariate (p = 0.6) or multivariate analysis (p = 0.49). Only the number of ARDS risk factors was independently associated with the development of ARDS (Adjusted Odds Ratio 2.8 per additional risk factor [95 % CI 1.2-6.5]). CONCLUSION: Patients with SAH requiring mechanical ventilation frequently breathe spontaneously, generating tidal volumes above usual protective thresholds regardless of meeting ARDS criteria. In patients with SAH, the presence of an additional ARDS risk factor should prompt close screening for the development of ARDS and consideration of adjustment of ventilator settings to meet lung protective thresholds.
BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is common following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), but the influence of mechanical ventilator settings on its development is unclear. We sought to determine adherence to lung protective thresholds in ventilated patients with SAH and describe the association between ventilator settings and subsequent development of ARDS. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients receiving mechanical ventilation within 72 h of SAH at a single academic center. Ventilator settings and blood gas data were collected twice daily for the first 7 days of ventilation along with ICU and hospital outcomes. Lung protective ventilation was defined as follows: tidal volume ≤8 mL/kg of predicted body weight, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ≥5 cm H(2)O, and peak or plateau pressure ≤30 cm H(2)O. The development of ARDS was ascertained retrospectively by PaO(2)/FiO(2) ≤300 with new bilateral lung opacities on chest X-ray within one day of hypoxemia. RESULTS: We identified 62 patients who underwent early mechanical ventilation following SAH. PS and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure were common ventilator modes with a median tidal volume of 7.8 mL/kg [interquartile range 6.8-8.8], median peak pressure of 14 cm H(2)O [IQR 12-17], and median PEEP of 5 cm H(2)O [IQR 5-6]. Adherence to tidal volumes ≤8 mL/kg was seen in 64 % of all observations and peak pressures <30 cm H(2)O were 94 % of all observations. All three lung protective criteria were seen in 58 % of all observations. Thirty-one patients (50 %) were determined to have ARDS. ARDS patients were more frequently ventilated with a peak pressure >30 cm H(2)O (11.3 % of ARDS ventilation days vs. 0 % of non-ARDS ventilation days; p < 0.01). Initial tidal volume was not associated with subsequent development of ARDS in univariate (p = 0.6) or multivariate analysis (p = 0.49). Only the number of ARDS risk factors was independently associated with the development of ARDS (Adjusted Odds Ratio 2.8 per additional risk factor [95 % CI 1.2-6.5]). CONCLUSION:Patients with SAH requiring mechanical ventilation frequently breathe spontaneously, generating tidal volumes above usual protective thresholds regardless of meeting ARDS criteria. In patients with SAH, the presence of an additional ARDS risk factor should prompt close screening for the development of ARDS and consideration of adjustment of ventilator settings to meet lung protective thresholds.
Authors: Jeremy M Kahn; Ellen C Caldwell; Steven Deem; David W Newell; Susan R Heckbert; Gordon D Rubenfeld Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Andrés Esteban; Niall D Ferguson; Maureen O Meade; Fernando Frutos-Vivar; Carlos Apezteguia; Laurent Brochard; Konstantinos Raymondos; Nicolas Nin; Javier Hurtado; Vinko Tomicic; Marco González; José Elizalde; Peter Nightingale; Fekri Abroug; Paolo Pelosi; Yaseen Arabi; Rui Moreno; Manuel Jibaja; Gabriel D'Empaire; Fredi Sandi; Dimitros Matamis; Ana María Montañez; Antonio Anzueto Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2007-10-25 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Andrés Esteban; Antonio Anzueto; Fernando Frutos; Inmaculada Alía; Laurent Brochard; Thomas E Stewart; Salvador Benito; Scott K Epstein; Carlos Apezteguía; Peter Nightingale; Alejandro C Arroliga; Martin J Tobin Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-01-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Luciana Mascia; Daniela Pasero; Arthur S Slutsky; M Jose Arguis; Maurizio Berardino; Salvatore Grasso; Marina Munari; Silvia Boifava; Giuseppe Cornara; Francesco Della Corte; Nicoletta Vivaldi; Paolo Malacarne; Paolo Del Gaudio; Sergio Livigni; Elisabeth Zavala; Claudia Filippini; Erica L Martin; Pier Paolo Donadio; Ilaria Mastromauro; V Marco Ranieri Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-12-15 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jan Claassen; An Vu; Kurt T Kreiter; Robert G Kowalski; Evelyn Y Du; Noeleen Ostapkovich; Brian-Fred M Fitzsimmons; E Sander Connolly; Stephan A Mayer Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: V Marco Ranieri; Gordon D Rubenfeld; B Taylor Thompson; Niall D Ferguson; Ellen Caldwell; Eddy Fan; Luigi Camporota; Arthur S Slutsky Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-06-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Karim Asehnoune; Ségolène Mrozek; Pierre François Perrigault; Philippe Seguin; Claire Dahyot-Fizelier; Sigismond Lasocki; Anne Pujol; Mathieu Martin; Russel Chabanne; Laurent Muller; Jean Luc Hanouz; Emmanuelle Hammad; Bertrand Rozec; Thomas Kerforne; Carole Ichai; Raphael Cinotti; Thomas Geeraerts; Djillali Elaroussi; Paolo Pelosi; Samir Jaber; Marie Dalichampt; Fanny Feuillet; Véronique Sebille; Antoine Roquilly Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2017-03-18 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: James E Towner; Redi Rahmani; Christopher G Zammit; Imad R Khan; David A Paul; Tarun Bhalla; Debra E Roberts Journal: Crit Care Date: 2020-09-24 Impact factor: 9.097