Literature DB >> 25022444

Substantial cultures of Propionibacterium can be found in apparently aseptic shoulders revised three years or more after the index arthroplasty.

Erik McGoldrick1, Matthew D McElvany1, Susan Butler-Wu2, Paul S Pottinger3, Frederick A Matsen4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Revisions of apparently "aseptic" shoulder arthroplasties are not infrequently culture positive for Propionibacterium, organisms that may be introduced at the time of the index surgery when the dermal sebaceous glands are transected. This report seeks to answer the question, Do surgeons performing revision shoulder arthroplasty years after the index procedure need to be concerned about the persistence of Propionibacterium?
METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 148 revision arthroplasties performed between July 2008 and June 2013 to find those revisions performed at least 3 years after the index procedure and at which intraoperative cultures were strongly positive for Propionibacterium.
RESULTS: We identified 14 cases of revision surgery performed 8 ± 4 years after the original arthroplasty for which deep cultures were strongly positive for Propionibacterium. A total of 109 specimens were obtained, 84 of which were positive. All 14 patients were male.
CONCLUSION: Shoulder arthroplasties revised for the mechanical problems of loosening or stiffness can be substantially culture positive for Propionibacterium, even if the revision is performed many years after the index procedure. Therefore, even in shoulder arthroplasties revised for mechanical problems years after the index procedures, surgeons should consider submitting multiple deep specimens for specific Propionibacterium culture. In the presence of persistent Propionibacterium, surgeons should consider the need for directed surgical and medical treatment in their management of a failed arthroplasty.
Copyright © 2015 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Propionibacterium; Shoulder arthroplasty; revision

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25022444     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  17 in total

1.  Diabetes Disease Severity Was Not Associated with Risk of Deep Infection or Revision After Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew D McElvany; Priscilla H Chan; Heather A Prentice; Elizabeth W Paxton; Mark T Dillon; Ronald A Navarro
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Management of complications after revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hithem Rahmi; Andrew Jawa
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-03

Review 3.  What is a "periprosthetic shoulder infection"? A systematic review of two decades of publications.

Authors:  Jason E Hsu; Jeremy S Somerson; Kiet V Vo; Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Utility of strain typing of Propionibacterium acnes in central nervous system and prosthetic joint infections to differentiate contamination from infection: a retrospective cohort.

Authors:  J P Burnham; A Shupe; C-A D Burnham; D K Warren
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Cutibacterium acnes Isolates from Deep Tissue Specimens Retrieved during Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty: Similar Colony Morphology Does Not Indicate Clonality.

Authors:  Roger E Bumgarner; Della Harrison; Jason E Hsu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  The ream and run: not for every patient, every surgeon or every problem.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Microbiologic profile of infections in presumed aseptic revision spine surgery.

Authors:  Grant D Shifflett; Benjamin T Bjerke-Kroll; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Janina Kueper; Jayme Burket; Andrew A Sama; Federico P Girardi; Frank P Cammisa; Alexander P Hughes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Cutibacterium acnes infections in revision surgery for persistent shoulder complaints: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Nathalie Pruijn; Floor M van Diek; Jacques F Meis; Nienke M Kosse; Oscar Dorrestijn
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 9.  Detritic synovitis can mimic a Propionibacterium periprosthetic infection.

Authors:  Jacob D Gorbaty; Robert M Lucas; Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 10.  Scoping review: Diagnosis and management of periprosthetic joint infection in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anthony Egglestone; Helen Ingoe; Jonathan Rees; Michael Thomas; Richard Jeavons; Amar Rangan
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-07-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.