Bradley D Stein1, Maria Pangilinan, Mark J Sorbero, Sue M Marcus, Sheila A Donahue, Yan Xu, Thomas E Smith, Susan M Essock. 1. Dr. Stein and Mr. Sorbero are with RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh (e-mail: stein@rand.org ). Dr. Stein is also with the Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh. Dr. Pangilinan, Ms. Donahue, and Ms. Xu are with the Office of Performance Measurement and Evaluation, New York State Office of Mental Health, Albany. Dr. Marcus, Dr. Smith, and Dr. Essock are with the Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City. Dr. Marcus is also with the Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health. Dr. Smith and Dr. Essock are also with Mental Health Services and Policy Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: As health information technology advances, efforts to use administrative data to inform real-time treatment planning for individuals are increasing, despite few empirical studies demonstrating that such administrative data predict subsequent clinical events. Medicaid claims for individuals with frequent psychiatric hospitalizations were examined to test how well patterns of service use predict subsequent high short-term risk of continued psychiatric hospitalizations. METHODS: Medicaid claims files from New York and Pennsylvania were used to identify Medicaid recipients ages 18-64 with two or more inpatient psychiatric admissions during a target year ending March 31, 2009. Definitions from a quality-improvement initiative were used to identify patterns of inpatient and outpatient service use and prescription fills suggestive of clinical concerns. Generalized estimating equations and Markov models were applied to examine claims through March 2011, to see what patterns of service use were sufficiently predictive of additional hospitalizations to be clinically useful. RESULTS: A total of 11,801 individuals in New York and 1,859 in Pennsylvania identified met the cohort definition. In both Pennsylvania and New York, multiple recent hospitalizations, but not failure to use outpatient services or failure to fill medication prescriptions, were significant predictors of high risk of continued frequent hospitalizations, with odds ratios greater than 4.0. CONCLUSIONS: Administrative data can be used to identify individuals at high risk of continued frequent hospitalizations. Payers and system administrators could use such information to authorize special services (such as mobile outreach) for such individuals to promote service engagement and prevent rapid rehospitalizations.
OBJECTIVE: As health information technology advances, efforts to use administrative data to inform real-time treatment planning for individuals are increasing, despite few empirical studies demonstrating that such administrative data predict subsequent clinical events. Medicaid claims for individuals with frequent psychiatric hospitalizations were examined to test how well patterns of service use predict subsequent high short-term risk of continued psychiatric hospitalizations. METHODS: Medicaid claims files from New York and Pennsylvania were used to identify Medicaid recipients ages 18-64 with two or more inpatient psychiatric admissions during a target year ending March 31, 2009. Definitions from a quality-improvement initiative were used to identify patterns of inpatient and outpatient service use and prescription fills suggestive of clinical concerns. Generalized estimating equations and Markov models were applied to examine claims through March 2011, to see what patterns of service use were sufficiently predictive of additional hospitalizations to be clinically useful. RESULTS: A total of 11,801 individuals in New York and 1,859 in Pennsylvania identified met the cohort definition. In both Pennsylvania and New York, multiple recent hospitalizations, but not failure to use outpatient services or failure to fill medication prescriptions, were significant predictors of high risk of continued frequent hospitalizations, with odds ratios greater than 4.0. CONCLUSIONS: Administrative data can be used to identify individuals at high risk of continued frequent hospitalizations. Payers and system administrators could use such information to authorize special services (such as mobile outreach) for such individuals to promote service engagement and prevent rapid rehospitalizations.
Authors: Todd P Gilmer; Christian R Dolder; Jonathan P Lacro; David P Folsom; Laurie Lindamer; Piedad Garcia; Dilip V Jeste Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Susan M Frayne; Eric Berg; Tyson H Holmes; Kaajal Laungani; Dan R Berlowitz; Donald R Miller; Leonard Pogach; Valerie W Jackson; Rudolf Moos Journal: J Rehabil Res Dev Date: 2010
Authors: Thomas E Smith; Anita Appel; Sheila A Donahue; Susan M Essock; Carlos T Jackson; Adam Karpati; Trish Marsik; Robert W Myers; Lily Tom; Lloyd I Sederer Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Thomas E Smith; Anita Appel; Sheila A Donahue; Susan M Essock; Doreen Thomann-Howe; Adam Karpati; Trish Marsik; Robert W Myers; Mark J Sorbero; Bradley D Stein Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2014-09
Authors: Maria C Raven; Kelly M Doran; Shannon Kostrowski; Colleen C Gillespie; Brian D Elbel Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2011-10-13 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Kimberly Eaton Hoagwood; Susan Essock; Joseph Morrissey; Anne Libby; Sheila Donahue; Benjamin Druss; Molly Finnerty; Linda Frisman; Meera Narasimhan; Bradley D Stein; Jennifer Wisdom; Judy Zerzan Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2016-01
Authors: Jamie Kammer; Mahfuza Rahman; Molly Finnerty; Deborah Layman; Katrina Vega; Hanga Galfalvy; Christa Labouliere; Gregory K Brown; Kelly Green; Anni Cummings; Prabu Vasan; Barbara Stanley Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2021-04 Impact factor: 1.505