Clare Davidson1, Charles Neighbors, Gerod Hall, Aaron Hogue, Richard Cho, Bryan Kutner, Jon Morgenstern. 1. Ms. Davidson, Dr. Neighbors, Dr. Hall, Dr. Hogue, and Dr. Morgenstern are with the Division of Health and Treatment Research and Analysis, National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse (CASAColumbia), Columbia University (e-mail: clare.e.davidson@gmail.com ). Dr. Morgenstern is also with the Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York City. Mr. Cho is with the United States Interagency Council on Homelessness, Washington, D.C. Mr. Kutner is a consultant with the Corporation for Supportive Housing, New York City.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Housing First is a supportive housing model for persons with histories of chronic homelessness that emphasizes client-centered services, provides immediate housing, and does not require treatment for mental illness or substance abuse as a condition of participation. Previous studies of Housing First have found reduced governmental costs and improved personal well-being among participants. However, variations in real-world program implementation require better understanding of the relationship between implementation and outcomes. This study investigated the effects of Housing First implementation on housing and substance use outcomes. METHODS: Study participants were 358 individuals with histories of chronic homelessness and problematic substance use. Clients were housed in nine scatter-site Housing First programs in New York City. Program fidelity was judged across a set of core Housing First components. Client interviews at baseline and 12 months were used to assess substance use. RESULTS: Clients in programs with greater fidelity to consumer participation components of Housing First were more likely to be retained in housing and were less likely to report using stimulants or opiates at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Consistently implemented Housing First principles related to consumer participation were associated with superior housing and substance use outcomes among chronically homeless individuals with a history of substance use problems. The study findings suggest that program implementation is central to understanding the potential of Housing First to help clients achieve positive housing and substance use outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: Housing First is a supportive housing model for persons with histories of chronic homelessness that emphasizes client-centered services, provides immediate housing, and does not require treatment for mental illness or substance abuse as a condition of participation. Previous studies of Housing First have found reduced governmental costs and improved personal well-being among participants. However, variations in real-world program implementation require better understanding of the relationship between implementation and outcomes. This study investigated the effects of Housing First implementation on housing and substance use outcomes. METHODS: Study participants were 358 individuals with histories of chronic homelessness and problematic substance use. Clients were housed in nine scatter-site Housing First programs in New York City. Program fidelity was judged across a set of core Housing First components. Client interviews at baseline and 12 months were used to assess substance use. RESULTS: Clients in programs with greater fidelity to consumer participation components of Housing First were more likely to be retained in housing and were less likely to report using stimulants or opiates at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Consistently implemented Housing First principles related to consumer participation were associated with superior housing and substance use outcomes among chronically homeless individuals with a history of substance use problems. The study findings suggest that program implementation is central to understanding the potential of Housing First to help clients achieve positive housing and substance use outcomes.
Authors: Ruthanne Marcus; Alexander de Groot; Sara Bachman; Nicole Chisolm; Yasmeen Quadri; Howard Cabral; Serena Rajabiun Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Olivia V Fletcher; Jessica A Chen; Jenna van Draanen; Madeline C Frost; Anna D Rubinsky; John R Blosnich; Emily C Williams Journal: SSM Popul Health Date: 2022-06-28
Authors: Enrico G Castillo; Bowen Chung; Elizabeth Bromley; Sheryl H Kataoka; Joel T Braslow; Susan M Essock; Alexander S Young; Jared M Greenberg; Jeanne Miranda; Lisa B Dixon; Kenneth B Wells Journal: Harv Rev Psychiatry Date: 2018 Mar/Apr Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Eric A Latimer; Daniel Rabouin; Zhirong Cao; Angela Ly; Guido Powell; Carol E Adair; Jitender Sareen; Julian M Somers; Vicky Stergiopoulos; Andrew D Pinto; Erica E M Moodie; Scott R Veldhuizen Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2019-08-02
Authors: Sara A Miller-Archie; Sarah C Walters; Angelica Bocour; Miranda S Moore; Ellen Wiewel; Tejinder Singh; Sungwoo Lim Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2022-10-07 Impact factor: 7.759