Literature DB >> 25022286

How are decisions on care services for people with dementia made and experienced? A systematic review and qualitative synthesis of recent empirical findings.

Annika Taghizadeh Larsson1, Johannes H Österholm2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During recent decades, there has been a growing recognition that people cannot be assumed incapable of making decisions about their own care solely on the basis of a dementia diagnosis and international agreements and legislative changes have strengthened the formal right for people with dementia to participate in decisions on care services. This raises important questions about how these decisions are currently made and experienced in practice. In this review, we address this question and highlight directions for further research.
METHODS: We searched CINAHL, PsycINFO, ASSIA, Social Services Abstracts, Science Direct, Academic Search Premier, and PubMed. Twenty-four pertinent articles were identified, all representing qualitative studies. Relevant findings were extracted and synthesized along dimensions of involvement of the person with dementia in decisions on care services, using an integrative approach to qualitative synthesis.
RESULTS: We identified three overarching ways in which people with dementia are involved, primarily, in the informal part of a process of decisions: excluded, prior preferences taken into account, and current preferences respected. Several (10) articles seemed to be based on the assumption that decisions on care services are invariably and solely made within the family and without participation of the person with dementia.
CONCLUSIONS: The review emphasizes the need for more updated research about international debates and agreements concerning capabilities and rights of people with dementia and about the (potential) formal contexts of care decisions in the country concerned. This, we argue, is vital for future knowledge production in the area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25022286     DOI: 10.1017/S104161021400132X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr        ISSN: 1041-6102            Impact factor:   3.878


  15 in total

1.  Exploring the enablers and barriers to implementing the Medication Appropriateness Tool for Comorbid Health conditions during Dementia (MATCH-D) criteria in Australia: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Amy Theresa Page; Rhonda Marise Clifford; Kathleen Potter; Liza Seubert; Andrew J McLachlan; Xaysja Hill; Stephanie King; Vaughan Clark; Cristin Ryan; Nikesh Parekh; Christopher D Etherton-Beer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 2.  Diagnostic dilemmas in Alzheimer's disease: Room for shared decision making.

Authors:  Wiesje M van der Flier; Marleen Kunneman; Femke H Bouwman; Ronald C Petersen; Ellen M A Smets
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (N Y)       Date:  2017-05-09

3.  Clinicians' views on conversations and shared decision making in diagnostic testing for Alzheimer's disease: The ABIDE project.

Authors:  Marleen Kunneman; Ellen M A Smets; Femke H Bouwman; Niki S M Schoonenboom; Marissa D Zwan; Ruth Pel-Littel; Wiesje M van der Flier
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (N Y)       Date:  2017-05-10

4.  Deciding upon Transition to Residential Care for Persons Living with Dementia: why Do Iranian Family Caregivers Living in Sweden Cease Caregiving at Home?

Authors:  Mahin Kiwi; Lars-Christer Hydén; Eleonor Antelius
Journal:  J Cross Cult Gerontol       Date:  2018-03

5.  Cancer-related information needs and treatment decision-making experiences of people with dementia in England: a multiple perspective qualitative study.

Authors:  Lorna McWilliams; Carole Farrell; John Keady; Caroline Swarbrick; Lorraine Burgess; Gunn Grande; Sarah Bellhouse; Janelle Yorke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Shared decision-making for people living with dementia in extended care settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rachel Louise Daly; Frances Bunn; Claire Goodman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-06-09       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Patients' and caregivers' views on conversations and shared decision making in diagnostic testing for Alzheimer's disease: The ABIDE project.

Authors:  Marleen Kunneman; Ruth Pel-Littel; Femke H Bouwman; Freek Gillissen; Niki S M Schoonenboom; Jules J Claus; Wiesje M van der Flier; Ellen M A Smets
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (N Y)       Date:  2017-05-10

8.  Home-dwelling persons with dementia's perception on care support: Qualitative study.

Authors:  Stein Erik Fæø; Frøydis Kristine Bruvik; Oscar Tranvåg; Bettina S Husebo
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 2.874

9.  Using poetry as data to explore daily and formal care decision making within African American dementia dyads.

Authors:  Kalisha Bonds Johnson; Fayron R Epps; MinKyoung Song; Karen S Lyons; Martha Driessnack
Journal:  Geriatr Nurs       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 2.525

10.  Medication appropriateness tool for co-morbid health conditions in dementia: consensus recommendations from a multidisciplinary expert panel.

Authors:  A T Page; K Potter; R Clifford; A J McLachlan; C Etherton-Beer
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.