M Torres-Torres1, J Mingo-Robinet2, M Moreno Barrero3, J Á Rivas Laso2, I Burón Álvarez2, M González Salvador2. 1. Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Unidad de Traumatología, Complejo Asistencial Palencia, Palencia, España. Electronic address: mtorres.cot@hotmail.com. 2. Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Unidad de Traumatología, Complejo Asistencial Palencia, Palencia, España. 3. Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Complejo Asistencial Palencia, Palencia, España.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To analyse the exposure of two Orthopaedic Surgeons to ionizing radiations in their daily work, and to review the main national and international recommendations on this subject. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on the surgical treatments that use fluoroscopy performed by two Orthopaedic Surgeons during a one year period. An evaluation was made of the radiation received, based on measurements of the processes published in the bibliography section. A literature review of international recommendations and regulations is also presented. RESULTS: The radiation received by the two Orthopaedic Surgeons during one year did not exceed the limits of present-day legislation or the new European and international recommendations. The exposure was asymmetrical, with the hands being the most radiated part. The new recommendations reduce the permitted level of radiation on eyes. DISCUSSION: The evaluation of the radiation received demonstrates the need for radiation protection, paying particular attention to the hands and eyes. Good knowledge of operating a fluoroscope and radiation safety measures are also essential.
OBJECTIVE: To analyse the exposure of two Orthopaedic Surgeons to ionizing radiations in their daily work, and to review the main national and international recommendations on this subject. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on the surgical treatments that use fluoroscopy performed by two Orthopaedic Surgeons during a one year period. An evaluation was made of the radiation received, based on measurements of the processes published in the bibliography section. A literature review of international recommendations and regulations is also presented. RESULTS: The radiation received by the two Orthopaedic Surgeons during one year did not exceed the limits of present-day legislation or the new European and international recommendations. The exposure was asymmetrical, with the hands being the most radiated part. The new recommendations reduce the permitted level of radiation on eyes. DISCUSSION: The evaluation of the radiation received demonstrates the need for radiation protection, paying particular attention to the hands and eyes. Good knowledge of operating a fluoroscope and radiation safety measures are also essential.