Literature DB >> 25019590

Suppression of the N1 auditory evoked potential for sounds generated by the upper and lower limbs.

Michiel van Elk1, Roy Salomon2, Oliver Kannape3, Olaf Blanke4.   

Abstract

Sensory attenuation is typically observed for self-generated compared to externally generated action effects. In the present study we investigated whether auditory sensory suppression is modulated as a function of sounds being generated by the upper or lower limbs. We report sensory attenuation, as reflected in a reduced auditory N1 component, which was comparable for sounds generated by the lower and the upper limbs. Increasing temporal delays between actions and sounds did not modulate suppression of the N1 component, but did have an effect on the latency of the N1 component. In contrast, for the P2 component sensory suppression was only observed for sounds generated by the hands and presented at short latencies. These findings provide new insight into the functional and neural dynamics of sensory suppression and suggest the existence of comparable agency mechanisms for both the upper and the lower limbs.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agency; Auditory N1; EEG; Efferent copy; Forward models; Sensory suppression; Upper and lower limbs

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25019590     DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  8 in total

Review 1.  Listening to another sense: somatosensory integration in the auditory system.

Authors:  Calvin Wu; Roxana A Stefanescu; David T Martel; Susan E Shore
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2014-12-21       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 2.  The auditory brain in action: Intention determines predictive processing in the auditory system-A review of current paradigms and findings.

Authors:  Betina Korka; Andreas Widmann; Florian Waszak; Álvaro Darriba; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-09-10

3.  N100 as a generic cortical electrophysiological marker based on decomposition of TMS-evoked potentials across five anatomic locations.

Authors:  Xiaoming Du; Fow-Sen Choa; Ann Summerfelt; Laura M Rowland; Joshua Chiappelli; Peter Kochunov; L Elliot Hong
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Sensorimotor Induction of Auditory Misattribution in Early Psychosis.

Authors:  Roy Salomon; Pierre Progin; Alessandra Griffa; Giulio Rognini; Kim Q Do; Philippe Conus; Silvia Marchesotti; Fosco Bernasconi; Patric Hagmann; Andrea Serino; Olaf Blanke
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 9.306

5.  Role of the Cerebellum in Adaptation to Delayed Action Effects.

Authors:  Liyu Cao; Domenica Veniero; Gregor Thut; Joachim Gross
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Incidental or Intentional? Different Brain Responses to One's Own Action Sounds in Hurdling vs. Tap Dancing.

Authors:  Nina Heins; Jennifer Pomp; Daniel S Kluger; Ima Trempler; Karen Zentgraf; Markus Raab; Ricarda I Schubotz
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Congruency of intervening events and self-induced action influence prediction of final results.

Authors:  Tsukasa Kimura; Jun'ichi Katayama
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Intention-based and sensory-based predictions.

Authors:  Álvaro Darriba; Yi-Fang Hsu; Sandrien Van Ommen; Florian Waszak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.