| Literature DB >> 25019049 |
Miguel A M Rodrigues1, Ana L Lourenço1, John W Cone2, Fernando M Nunes3, Ana S Santos4, José M M Cordeiro5, Cristina M V Guedes1, Luis M M Ferreira1.
Abstract
One of the main constraints hindering the increase of animal production in semi-arid regions of Africa is the inadequate supply of nutrients during the dry season. Incorporation of alternative feed resources in ruminant diets during this period could be a viable approach to overcome these limitations. The objective of this study was to evaluate the nutritive value of muiumba (Baikiaea plurijuga) tree seeds as an alternative nutrient source for ruminants. Muiumba seeds were compared to other eight feedstuffs including two cereal grains (corn and oat), two wheat by-products (wheat bran and distilled wheat) and four protein meals (coconut meal, sunflower meal, soybean meal and rapeseed meal) as to its chemical composition, in vitro organic matter digestibility (IVOMD) and in vitro gas production. The moderate crude protein concentrations (145 g/kg DM) of muiumba seeds indicate that this feedstuff could not be used as a protein supplement, contrarily to the majority of multipurpose tree seeds. Although the starch content was scarce (15 g/kg DM), the low neutral detergent fibre (235 g/kg DM), low molecular weight sugar (76.1 g/kg DM) and non-starch polysaccharide (510.5 g/kg DM) contents indicate that this feedstuff has potential feeding value. This was confirmed by the IVOMD (0.770) and by the data provided by the in vitro gas production showing that muiumba seeds had high (P < 0.05) maximum gas production and fractional fermentation rates, suggesting that these seeds are characterized by a highly fermentable fraction.Entities:
Keywords: Muiumba seeds; Nutritive value
Year: 2014 PMID: 25019049 PMCID: PMC4087328 DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-311
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Chemical composition of feedstuffs (g/kg DM) compared in the present study, results are expressed as mean ± SE
| Feeds | Ash | CP | NDF | KL | EE | Starch |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muiumba seeds | 26 ± 0.3 | 145 ± 3.2 | 235 ± 7.9 | 180 ± 10.5 | 101 ± 4.7 | 15 ± 1.2 |
| Corn | 15 ± 0.7 | 87 ± 3.1 | 100 ± 8.3 | 34 ± 3.8 | 46 ± 5.6 | 789 ± 20.4 |
| Oats | 25 ± 0.7 | 100 ± 4.2 | 315 ± 7.7 | 104 ± 9.8 | 51 ± 4.9 | 464 ± 35.5 |
| Distilled wheat | 83 ± 1.3 | 329 ± 7.4 | 453 ± 12.9 | 87 ± 6.9 | 47 ± 5.1 | 25 ± 2.7 |
| Wheat bran | 94 ± 1.8 | 113 ± 1.6 | 547 ± 7.6 | 148 ± 9.9 | 41 ± 4.3 | 154 ± 14.3 |
| Coconut meal | 71 ± 1.6 | 213 ± 7.2 | 555 ± 10.2 | 66 ± 4.4 | 56 ± 2.0 | 25 ± 2.6 |
| Sunflower meal | 65 ± 0.3 | 257 ± 4.4 | 485 ± 8.8 | 129 ± 7.9 | 24 ± 3.0 | 15 ± 0.7 |
| Rapeseed meal | 73 ± 0.3 | 353 ± 5.6 | 325 ± 11.3 | 139 ± 4.4 | 38 ± 1.5 | 25 ± 1.3 |
| Soybean meal | 70 ± 0.9 | 444 ± 8.7 | 147 ± 3.1 | 36 ± 4.1 | 19 ± 2.1 | 27 ± 0.7 |
CP crude protein, NDF neutral detergent fibre, KL Klason lignin, EE ether extract.
Low molecular weight sugars of feedstuffs (g/kg DM) compared in the present study, results are expressed as mean ± SE
| Feeds | Glucose | Frutose | Sucrose | Maltose | Verbascose | Raffinose | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muiumba seeds | 0.18 ± 0.01 | 4.24 ± 0.12 | 13.83 ± 0.55 | 32.88 ± 1.97 | ND | 25.00 ± 1.41 | 76.1 |
| Corn | 1.49 ± 0.05 | 1.77 ± 0.05 | 18.05 ± 0.41 | 17.62 ± 0.77 | ND | 1.82 ± 0.09 | 40.8 |
| Oats | 0.52 ± 0.03 | 0.76 ± 0.02 | 8.03 ± 0.25 | 7.55 ± 1.97 | 0.50 ± 0.02 | 8.46 ± 0.51 | 28.8 |
| Distilled wheat | 0.51 ± 0.02 | ND | 6.07 ± 0.36 | 1.04 ± 0.39 | 0.19 ± 0.01 | 1.19 ± 0.07 | 9.3 |
| Wheat bran | 2.48 ± 0.10 | 1.61 ± 0.06 | 20.60 ± 1.23 | 49.60 ± 3.27 | 0.67 ± 0.04 | 12.04 ± 0.47 | 87.0 |
| Coconut meal | 0.43 ± 0.02 | 5.30 ± 0.11 | 52.66 ± 2.64 | 3.66 ± 0.07 | ND | 5.06 ± 0.27 | 67.1 |
| Sunflower meal | 2.96 ± 0.11 | 5.09 ± 0.13 | 39.60 ± 2.08 | 203.30 ± 10.9 | 1.16 ± 0.07 | 0.78 ± 0.03 | 252.6 |
| Rapeseed meal | 0.78 ± 0.04 | 1.26 ± 0.04 | 58.59 ± 3.52 | 1.00 ± 0.04 | 0.99 ± 0.03 | 1.78 ± 0.10 | 62.7 |
| Soybean meal | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.23 ± 0.01 | 39.75 ± 1.65 | 115.10 ± 6.46 | 28.90 ± 1.77 | ND | 184.2 |
ND not detected.
Composition of non-starch polysaccharides (NSP) of feedstuffs (g/kg DM) compared in the present study, results are expressed as mean ± SE
| NSP | Muiumba seeds | Corn | Oats | Distilled wheat | Wheat bran | Coconut meal | Sunflower meal | Rapeseed meal | Soybean meal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soluble NSP | |||||||||
| Fucose | 0.2 ± 0.1 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Arabinose | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 25.5 ± 1.8 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 16.2 ± 1.3 | 14.5 ± 0.9 | 27.6 ± 2.3 |
| Rhamnose | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Galactose | 14.3 ± 1.1 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 1.0 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 3.9 ± 0.4 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 50.4 ± 4.0 |
| Glucose | 145.1 ± 12.9 | 30.2 ± 2.1 | 18.4 ± 1.2 | 54.5 ± 4.8 | 162.1 ± 14.8 | 10.1 ± 0.5 | 183.3 ± 10.9 | 22.8 ± 2.0 | 97.3 ± 8.7 |
| Xylose | 19.4 ± 2.4 | 30.3 ± 2.7 | 43.4 ± 3.9 | 27.2 ± 1.8 | 34.8 ± 2.5 | 2.4 ± 0.2 | 45.1 ± 3.1 | 5.6 ± 0.5 | 8.8 ± 0.8 |
| Mannose | ND | 11.5 ± 0.6 | 2.0 ± 0.2 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 113.1 ± 9.6 | 2.7 ± 0.3 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 5.9 ± 0.6 |
| Uronic acids | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 9.2 ± 0.8 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 2.3 ± 0.2 |
| Total | 182.4 ± 13.1 | 73.8 ± 3.5 | 67.2 ± 4.1 | 108.9 ± 5.5 | 201.1 ± 15.0 | 127.4 ± 9.6 | 260.6 ± 11.4 | 45.0 ± 2.26 | 192.3 ± 9.9 |
| Insoluble NSP | |||||||||
| Fucose | 0.3 ± 0.1 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Arabinose | 33.3 ± 3.9 | 18.0 ± 1.1 | 7.6 ± 0.6 | 18.0 ± 1.5 | 55.0 ± 4.2 | 6.6 ± 0.6 | 16.9 ± 1.3 | 41.3 ± 0.4 | 8.0 ± 0.8 |
| Rhamnose | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Galactose | 72.2 ± 5.4 | 3.3 ± 0.2 | 2.7 ± 0.2 | 3.5 ± 0.3 | 5.3 ± 0.4 | 13.3 ± 1.2 | 5.3 ± 0.4 | 13.4 ± 1.0 | 12.5 ± 0.9 |
| Glucose | 150.0 ± 13.4 | 30.8 ± 1.6 | 66.4 ± 5.6 | 61.0 ± 5.1 | 217.8 ± 16.8 | 54.0 ± 4.3 | 135.6 ± 11.2 | 98.9 ± 8.1 | 25.8 ± 2.1 |
| Xylose | 78.6 ± 4.6 | 35.2 ± 2.5 | 77.7 ± 6.9 | 65.5 ± 5.8 | 239.3 ± 16.2 | 1.9 ± 0.2 | 80.8 ± 7.1 | 17.1 ± 1.6 | 5.8 ± 0.5 |
| Mannose | ND | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 13.5 ± 1.1 | 1.9 ± 0.2 | 300.1 ± 25.2 | 7.0 ± 0.6 | 5.3 ± 0.5 | 2.2 ± 0.2 |
| Uronic acids | 5.3 ± 0.6 | 2.6 ± 0.3 | 2.6 ± 0.2 | 3.2 ± 0.3 | 5.1 ± 0.4 | 4.7 ± 0.4 | 18.6 ± 1.7 | 23.2 ± 1.9 | 10.4 ± 1.0 |
| Total | 339.7 ± 15.7 | 91.2 ± 3..3 | 158.5 ± 8.9 | 164.7 ± 8.0 | 524.4 ± 23.6 | 380.6 ± 25.6 | 264.1 ± 13.5 | 199.2 ± 8.6 | 64.7 ± 2.7 |
| Total NSP | 522.1 ± 20.4 | 165.0 ± 4.8 | 225.7 ± 9.8 | 273.6 ± 9.7 | 725.5 ± 27.9 | 508.0 ± 27.3 | 524.7 ± 17.7 | 244.2 ± 8.8 | 257.0 ± 10.3 |
ND not detected.
Parameters of gas production profiles fitted with mono-phasic Groot’s model and digestibility of feedstuffs compared in the present study
| Feeds | Gas production parameters a | IVOMD b | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Muiumba seeds | 257.6bc | 6.8a | 2.07c | 24.9ef | 4.1cd | 0.130e | 0.770d |
| Corn | 356.6d | 8.8cd | 2.03c | 26.7f | 5.1d | 0.100d | 0.851g |
| Oats | 271.2bc | 6.9ab | 1.55b | 23.8e | 2.6ab | 0.107d | 0.709c |
| Distilled wheat | 262.6bc | 9.9de | 1.36ab | 16.7bc | 2.5ab | 0.074b | 0.873h |
| Wheat bran | 200.4a | 13.0f | 1.21a | 10.4a | 1.8a | 0.057a | 0.575a |
| Coconut meal | 287.6c | 12.5f | 1.93c | 14.8b | 6.9e | 0.068b | 0.807e |
| Sunflower meal | 195.6a | 6.9ab | 1.48b | 17.2cd | 2.3ab | 0.105d | 0.678b |
| Rapeseed meal | 256.7b | 8.1bc | 1.48b | 19.4d | 2.7ab | 0.090c | 0.825f |
| Soybean meal | 282.0bc | 10.4e | 1.48b | 16.6bc | 3.4bc | 0.070b | 0.968i |
| SEM | 9.62 | 0.39 | 0.073 | 0.70 | 0.39 | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Probability | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Means in rows with different letters differ at P < 0.05.
a A is the estimated asymptotic gas production; B is the time of incubation at which half of the asymptotic gas production has been formed; C is the sharpness of the switching characteristic for the profile; RmaxG is the maximum rate of gas production; TRmaxG is the time at which maximum rate of gas production is reached; R is the fractional rate of fermentation.
b In vitro organic matter digestibility.
Figure 1Gas production curves of feedstuffs compared in the present study.