Literature DB >> 25018933

Chapter 8: Idiopathic membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis.

.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 25018933      PMCID: PMC4089590          DOI: 10.1038/kisup.2012.21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl (2011)        ISSN: 2157-1716


× No keyword cloud information.

INTRODUCTION

This chapter makes treatment recommendations for MPGN believed to be of unknown cause (idiopathic MPGN) in adults and children. The cost implications for global application of this guideline are addressed in Chapter 2. 8.1: 8.1.1: Evaluate patients with the histological (light-microscopic) pattern of MPGN for underlying diseases before considering a specific treatment regimen (see

BACKGROUND

MPGN is a light-microscopic “pattern of injury” caused by many disorders (see Table 20).[304, 305] Patients commonly present with nephrotic syndrome, hypertension, glomerular hematuria, and progressive kidney dysfunction.[304, 305] Reduction in the serum concentration of complement components (C3 and/or C4) is commonly, but not uniformly, observed.[305, 306]
Table 20

Underlying conditions associated with a membranoproliferative pattern of GN

Chronic infections (especially hepatitis C)
Autoimmune diseases (especially LN)
Monoclonal gammopathies (especially light-chain deposition disease and monoclonal IgG disease)
Complement dysregulation (especially complement factor H deficiency)
Chronic and healed thrombotic microangiopathies

GN, glomerulonephritis; LN, lupus nephritis.

MPGN can be further classified based on the extent and location of deposits of immunoglobulin and/or complement. The classification of MPGN according to ultrastructural appearances into MPGN type I, II, or III is commonly employed, but newer classification schema based on immunopathology are replacing this approach.[307, 308] Type I MPGN is associated with subendothelial and mesangial electron-dense deposits containing immunoglobulin and/or C3,[305, 309, 310] and is often due to an underlying chronic hepatitis B or C infection (see Chapter 9); type II MPGN with electron dense intramembranous deposits containing numerous complement components, but not immunoglobulin[305, 309] and is now known as “dense-deposit disease”. It has a distinctive etiology based on inherited or acquired abnormalities of complement regulatory proteins.[305, 311] Other rarer variants (type III MPGN) are also recognized based on abnormalities of the glomerular basement membrane and the location of electron-dense deposits. Immunopathological variants are recognized based on deposition of IgG and/or C3 component of complement in glomeruli. Those in which C3 is exclusively deposited are known as C3 GN.[305, 307, 308, 311] Treatment of MPGN is highly dependent on proper identification of underlying causes (see Table 20). In some patients C3 nephritic factor, an autoantibody to C3bBb, can be involved in the pathogenesis of type I, II, III, or C3 GN.[312, 313] Idiopathic MPGN is defined by exclusion of any other identifiable cause, most typically when the ultrastructural pattern is type I MPGN. Idiopathic type I MPGN is very uncommon in developed countries, but remains a relatively common, although diminishing, cause of nephrotic syndrome in developing countries, especially those with a high burden of endemic infectious diseases.[314]

RATIONALE

Based on the heterogeneity of cause and pattern of histologic injury of MPGN, all patients with MPGN must be thoroughly evaluated for underlying diseases before being classified as idiopathic MPGN, and before any specific treatment decisions can be made. 8.2: 8.2.1: We suggest that adults or children with presumed idiopathic MPGN accompanied by nephrotic syndrome There is very low–quality evidence to suggest the benefit of an immunosuppressive agent plus corticosteroids in the treatment of idiopathic (type I) MPGN with nephrotic syndrome and/or deteriorating kidney function. MPGN is identified by exclusion of all other known causes of the MPGN pattern on kidney biopsy. When there is a secondary MPGN, i.e., a defined cause for the MPGN pattern (see Table 20), treatment should be directed against that cause. A review of the evidence for the management of each of those conditions enumerated in Table 20 is outside the scope of this guideline. This section will consider only those patients who do not have any recognized underlying cause or pathobiological mechanism for the MPGN lesion. Most of these patients will have the type I pattern by electron microscopy. Many of the early reports of treatment of “idiopathic” MPGN likely inadvertently included cases of secondary MPGN. Therefore, the results of these studies must now be interpreted with great caution given today's knowledge regarding immunopathogenesis.[304, 305, 307, 308] Truly “idiopathic” MPGN is now a very uncommon condition, except in certain developing countries with a high endemic burden of infections. The few RCTs of treatment of idiopathic MPGN in children and adults have given inconsistent and largely inconclusive results.[304, 305] Many of the reported trials have weak experimental design or are underpowered, and thus the evidence base underlying the recommendations for treatment of “idiopathic” MPGN is very weak. Early claims of benefit for a combination of aspirin and dipyridamole for adults with idiopathic MPGN were later rejected[315, 316] and benefits of “antiplatelet” therapy in “idiopathic” MPGN remain in doubt.[317, 318] The benefit of long-term alternate-day corticosteroid therapy for “idiopathic” MPGN in children was suggested by observational studies and a single RCT, but the results were equivocal; there have been no subsequent confirmatory RCTs.[319, 320, 321, 322] The benefits of immunosuppressive therapy (cyclophosphamide or MMF) often combined with high-dose i.v. or oral steroids have never been demonstrated in RCTs. However, small, observational studies with short-term follow-up have suggested a benefit, mostly in subjects with a rapidly progressive course, often associated with extensive crescents, or in those with progressive kidney disease with persistence of severe nephrotic syndrome.[145, 317, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329] Publication bias might be operative in these reports. Progressive renal failure remains the only indication for immunosuppressive treatment, but the overall evidence for efficacy and safety is weak. See Chapters 13 and 14 for discussion of treatment of those cases of MPGN with superimposed extensive crescentic lesions and rapidly progressive renal failure.

RESEARCH RECOMMENDATION

An RCT is needed to test corticosteroids in combination with an immunosuppressive agent such as cyclophosphamide, MMF, or rituximab in “idiopathic” MPGN with nephrotic syndrome in adults and children.

DISCLAIMER

While every effort is made by the publishers, editorial board, and ISN to see that no inaccurate or misleading data, opinion or statement appears in this Journal, they wish to make it clear that the data and opinions appearing in the articles and advertisements herein are the responsibility of the contributor, copyright holder, or advertiser concerned. Accordingly, the publishers and the ISN, the editorial board and their respective employers, office and agents accept no liability whatsoever for the consequences of any such inaccurate or misleading data, opinion or statement. While every effort is made to ensure that drug doses and other quantities are presented accurately, readers are advised that new methods and techniques involving drug usage, and described within this Journal, should only be followed in conjunction with the drug manufacturer's own published literature.
  21 in total

Review 1.  C3 glomerulopathy: a new classification.

Authors:  Fadi Fakhouri; Véronique Frémeaux-Bacchi; Laure-Hélène Noël; H Terence Cook; Matthew C Pickering
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 28.314

2.  Treatment of mesangiocapillary glomerulonephritis with alternate-day prednisone--a report of the International Study of Kidney Disease in Children.

Authors:  P Tarshish; J Bernstein; J N Tobin; C M Edelmann
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.714

3.  Complement analysis in children with idiopathic membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis: a long-term follow-up.

Authors:  R Schwertz; U Rother; D Anders; N Gretz; K Schärer; M Kirschfink
Journal:  Pediatr Allergy Immunol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.377

4.  Results of a controlled drug trial in membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis.

Authors:  D C Cattran; C J Cardella; J M Roscoe; R C Charron; P C Rance; S M Ritchie; P N Corey
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 10.612

5.  Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. A prospective clinical trial of platelet-inhibitor therapy.

Authors:  J V Donadio; C F Anderson; J C Mitchell; K E Holley; D M Ilstrup; V Fuster; J H Chesebro
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-05-31       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Management of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis: evidence-based recommendations.

Authors:  A Levin
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 10.545

7.  Effect of aspirin and dipyridamole on proteinuria in idiopathic membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis: a multicentre prospective clinical trial. Collaborative Glomerulonephritis Therapy Study Group (CGTS)

Authors:  I Zäuner; J Böhler; N Braun; C Grupp; P Heering; P Schollmeyer
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 5.992

8.  The effect of prednisone in a high-dose, alternate-day regimen on the natural history of idiopathic membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis.

Authors:  P T McEnery; A J McAdams; C D West
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Immunosuppressive treatment of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis.

Authors:  R Faedda; A Satta; F Tanda; M Pirisi; E Bartoli
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.847

Review 10.  New approaches to the treatment of dense deposit disease.

Authors:  Richard J H Smith; Jessy Alexander; Paul N Barlow; Marina Botto; Thomas L Cassavant; H Terence Cook; Santiago Rodriguez de Córdoba; Gregory S Hageman; T Sakari Jokiranta; William J Kimberling; John D Lambris; Lynne D Lanning; Vicki Levidiotis; Christoph Licht; Hans U Lutz; Seppo Meri; Matthew C Pickering; Richard J Quigg; Angelique L Rops; David J Salant; Sanjeev Sethi; Joshua M Thurman; Hope F Tully; Sean P Tully; Johan van der Vlag; Patrick D Walker; Reinhard Würzner; Peter F Zipfel
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2007-08-05       Impact factor: 10.121

View more
  2 in total

1.  American Society of Nephrology clinical pathological conference.

Authors:  Kevin E Meyers; Helen Liapis; Mohamed G Atta
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Favorable effect of bortezomib in dense deposit disease associated with monoclonal gammopathy: a case report.

Authors:  Shuma Hirashio; Ayaka Satoh; Takahiro Arima; Kouichi Mandai; Tadasuke Awaya; Kumi Oshima; Shigeo Hara; Takao Masaki
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.388

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.