Literature DB >> 25018581

The Interplay of Reader Goals, Working Memory, and Text Structure During Reading.

Catherine M Bohn-Gettler1, Panayiota Kendeou2.   

Abstract

In the current study we examined the complex interactions of instructional context, text properties, and reader characteristics during comprehension. College students were tasked with the goal of reading for study versus entertainment (instructional context) while thinking-aloud about four different expository text structures (text properties). Working memory also was assessed (reader characteristics). Reading goals and working memory interacted to influence paraphrasing and non-coherence processes when thinking aloud. Reading goals, working memory, and text structure all interacted to influence text-based inferences. Text structure also influenced knowledge-based inferences. Post-reading recall was highest for those with the instructional goal of reading for study (compared to entertainment), as well as for problem-response and compare-contrast texts (compared to descriptive and chronological texts). Implications of the findings are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  comprehension; reading goals; text structure; think-aloud; working memory

Year:  2014        PMID: 25018581      PMCID: PMC4090711          DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Educ Psychol        ISSN: 0361-476X


  27 in total

1.  Reading both high-coherence and low-coherence texts: effects of text sequence and prior knowledge.

Authors:  D S McNamara
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2001-03

2.  Individual differences in working memory: introduction to the special section.

Authors:  A Miyake
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-06

3.  The reliability and stability of verbal working memory measures.

Authors:  Gloria S Waters; David Caplan
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2003-11

4.  The interactive effects of prior knowledge and text structure on memory for cognitive psychology texts.

Authors:  Judith Wylie; Carol McGuinness
Journal:  Br J Educ Psychol       Date:  2004-12

5.  Working memory capacity and the self-regulation of emotional expression and experience.

Authors:  Brandon J Schmeichel; Rachael N Volokhov; Heath A Demaree
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2008-12

6.  Emotion, motivation, and text comprehension: the detection of contradictions in passages.

Authors:  H C Ellis; S A Ottaway; L J Varner; A S Becker; B A Moore
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1997-06

7.  The role of working memory capacity and knowledge access in text inference processing.

Authors:  M Singer; K F Ritchot
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-11

8.  Two Decades of Structure Building.

Authors:  Morton Ann Gernsbacher
Journal:  Discourse Process       Date:  1997-01

9.  Goal-guided learning from text: inferring a descriptive processing model from inspection times and eye movements.

Authors:  E Z Rothkopf; M J Billington
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  1979-06

10.  Adults' and children's monitoring of story events in the service of comprehension.

Authors:  Catherine M Bohn-Gettler; David N Rapp; Paul van den Broek; Panayiota Kendeou; Mary Jane White
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-08
View more
  5 in total

1.  Does semantic knowledge influence event segmentation and recall of text?

Authors:  Kimberly M Newberry; Heather R Bailey
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-08

2.  Word-Decoding Skill Interacts With Working Memory Capacity to Influence Inference Generation During Reading.

Authors:  Stephen Hamilton; Erin Freed; Debra L Long
Journal:  Read Res Q       Date:  2016-05-09

3.  Attentional focus affects how events are segmented and updated in narrative reading.

Authors:  Heather R Bailey; Christopher A Kurby; Jesse Q Sargent; Jeffrey M Zacks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-08

4.  The think aloud paradigm reveals differences in the content, dynamics and conceptual scope of resting state thought in trait brooding.

Authors:  Quentin Raffaelli; Caitlin Mills; Nadia-Anais de Stefano; Matthias R Mehl; Kate Chambers; Surya A Fitzgerald; Ramsey Wilcox; Kalina Christoff; Eric S Andrews; Matthew D Grilli; Mary-Frances O'Connor; Jessica R Andrews-Hanna
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Effects of context and discrepancy when reading multiple documents.

Authors:  Cornelia Schoor; Jean-François Rouet; M Anne Britt
Journal:  Read Writ       Date:  2022-06-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.