Literature DB >> 25017958

Comparison of postoperative short-term complications after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein tension free inguinal hernia repair: a randomized trial study.

S Kargar1, S M Shiryazdi, M Zare, M H Mirshamsi, S Ahmadi, H Neamatzadeh.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this randomized trial was to compare short-term postoperative complications of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and Lichtenstein tension free hernia repair.
METHODS: A total of 120 patients who went inguinal hernia repair at Shahid Sadoughi university training hospital from April 2011 to August 2013 were randomized into two TAPP (N.=60) and Lichtenstein (N.=60) repair group. Follow-up occurred within 6 weeks. The postoperative assessments included pain score (VAS), hematoma/seroma, urinary retention, wound infection incidence, and duration of hospital stay.
RESULTS: Pain was the most common symptoms in both groups. The TAPP group patients significantly had experienced less postoperative pain than the Lichtenstein group in all moments (P<0.05). TAPP group had lower incidence of hematoma (TAPP, 6.6% vs. Lichtenstein 13.3%; P=0.67), seroma (TAPP 10% vs. Lichtenstein 13.3%; P=1.00), and infection (TAPP 0 vs. Lichtenstein 1.6%; P=0.67). However, no differences between the 2 groups were found in terms of postoperative complications. In TAPP group mean of hospital stay significantly was less than Lichtenstein group (TAPP, 8.13±2.19 vs. Lichtenstein, 13.15±1.5 days; P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic TAPP repair is safer and less complicated approach to inguinal hernia repair. The two main short-term advantages of the laparoscopic TAPP repair with the tension free Lichtenstein repair were less postoperative pain and earlier return to the normal life activities. No difference was seen in overall complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25017958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Chir        ISSN: 0026-4733            Impact factor:   1.000


  5 in total

1.  [Inguinal hernia repair in TAPP technique in a day-case surgery setting - at what price?]

Authors:  U Wirth; M-L Saller; T von Ahnen; F Köckerling; H M Schardey; S Schopf
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Primary unilateral not complicated inguinal hernia: our choice of TAPP, why, results and review of literature.

Authors:  R Bittner; J Schwarz
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  International guidelines for groin hernia management.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Anterior transversalis fascia approach versus preperitoneal space approach for inguinal hernia repair in residents in northern China: study protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.

Authors:  Qing Fan; De-Wei Zhang; Da-Ye Yang; Hong-Wu Li; Shi-Bo Wei; Liang Yang; Fu-Quan Yang; Shao-Jun Zhang; Yao-Qiang Wu; Wei-de An; Zhong-Shu Dai; Hui-Yong Jiang; Fu-Rong Wang; Shi-Feng Qiao; Hang-Yu Li
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Inguinal Hernia Mesh Repair: The Factors to Consider When Deciding Between Open Versus Laparoscopic Repair.

Authors:  Sri Vallabh Reddy Gudigopuram; Ciri C Raguthu; Harini Gajjela; Iljena Kela; Chandra L Kakarala; Mohammad Hassan; Rishab Belavadi; Ibrahim Sange
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-11-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.