OBJECTIVE: Relatively few studies have examined the long-term outcome of psychotherapy in social anxiety disorder. The authors previously reported findings of a clinical trial comparing cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), psychodynamic therapy, and a wait-list control. The purpose of the present study was to follow the participants' status over the ensuing 24 months. METHOD:Outpatients with social anxiety disorder who were treated withCBT (N=209) or psychodynamic therapy (N=207) in the previous trial were assessed 6, 12, and 24 months after the end of therapy. Primary outcome measures were rates of remission and response. RESULTS: For both CBT and psychodynamic therapy, response rates were approximately 70% by the 2-year follow-up. Remission rates were nearly 40% for both treatment conditions. Rates of response and remission were stable or tended to increase for both treatments over the 24-month follow-up period, and no significant differences were found between the treatment conditions after 6 months. CONCLUSIONS:CBT and psychodynamic therapy were efficacious in treating social anxiety disorder, in both the short- and long-term, when patients showed continuous improvement. Although in the short-term, intention-to-treat analyses yielded some statistically significant but small differences in favor of CBT in several outcome measures, no differences in outcome were found in the long-term.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Relatively few studies have examined the long-term outcome of psychotherapy in social anxiety disorder. The authors previously reported findings of a clinical trial comparing cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), psychodynamic therapy, and a wait-list control. The purpose of the present study was to follow the participants' status over the ensuing 24 months. METHOD: Outpatients with social anxiety disorder who were treated with CBT (N=209) or psychodynamic therapy (N=207) in the previous trial were assessed 6, 12, and 24 months after the end of therapy. Primary outcome measures were rates of remission and response. RESULTS: For both CBT and psychodynamic therapy, response rates were approximately 70% by the 2-year follow-up. Remission rates were nearly 40% for both treatment conditions. Rates of response and remission were stable or tended to increase for both treatments over the 24-month follow-up period, and no significant differences were found between the treatment conditions after 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: CBT and psychodynamic therapy were efficacious in treating social anxiety disorder, in both the short- and long-term, when patients showed continuous improvement. Although in the short-term, intention-to-treat analyses yielded some statistically significant but small differences in favor of CBT in several outcome measures, no differences in outcome were found in the long-term.
Authors: Annemarie Abbing; Anne Ponstein; Susan van Hooren; Leo de Sonneville; Hanna Swaab; Erik Baars Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-12-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Bita Mesri; Andrea N Niles; Andre Pittig; Richard T LeBeau; Ethan Haik; Michelle G Craske Journal: J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry Date: 2016-11-23
Authors: Jörg Wiltink; Jürgen Hoyer; Manfred E Beutel; Christian Ruckes; Stephan Herpertz; Peter Joraschky; Susan Koranyi; Matthias Michal; Björn Nolting; Karin Pöhlmann; Simone Salzer; Bernhard Strauss; Eric Leibing; Falk Leichsenring Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-01-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jörg Wiltink; Christian Ruckes; Jürgen Hoyer; Falk Leichsenring; Peter Joraschky; Frank Leweke; Karin Pöhlmann; Manfred E Beutel Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2017-03-14 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Bernhard Strauß; Uwe Altmann; Susanne Manes; Anne Tholl; Susan Koranyi; Tobias Nolte; Manfred E Beutel; Jörg Wiltink; Stephan Herpertz; Wolfgang Hiller; Jürgen Hoyer; Peter Joraschky; Björn Nolting; Viktoria Ritter; Ulrich Stangier; Ulrike Willutzki; Simone Salzer; Eric Leibing; Falk Leichsenring; Helmut Kirchmann Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-03-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Désirée Schoenherr; Jane Paulick; Bernhard M Strauss; Anne-Katharina Deisenhofer; Brian Schwartz; Julian A Rubel; Wolfgang Lutz; Ulrich Stangier; Uwe Altmann Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-02-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Tomas Lindegaard; Thomas Hesslow; Maja Nilsson; Robert Johansson; Per Carlbring; Peter Lilliengren; Gerhard Andersson Journal: Internet Interv Date: 2020-03-18