Literature DB >> 25016476

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral and intravenous cefetamet in dog.

Wei Wang1, Xiao-Mao Zhu2, Chun-Mei Wang1, Si Gou1, Zhong-Hua Chen3,4, Yuan Zhao5.   

Abstract

The pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of intravenously (IV) administered cefetamet-Na and per os (PO) administered cefetamet pivoxil were investigated in eighteen healthy dogs at three different dose levels. The three doses for IV cefetamet-Na were 95, 190 and 380 mg, while those for oral cefetamet pivoxil were 125, 250 and 500 mg (both equivalent to 90, 180 and 360 mg of cefetamet). An efficacy predictor, measured as the ratios of the time that the concentration of the free drug is over the MIC90 (T > MIC90) and the dosing interval (f% T > MIC90) of IV and PO administration were calculated. The PK parameters' maximum concentration (C max), half-life (t 1/2) and area under the curve (AUC0-t ) after three IV doses were 42.85 ± 11.79 μg/mL, 1.66 ± 0.36 h and 80.10 ± 28.92 mg h/L (95 mg); 93.50 ± 30.51 μg/mL, 1.47 ± 0.13 h and 1.47 ± 0.13 mg h/L (190 mg); 185.74 ± 113.83 μg/mL, 1.60 ± 0.38 h and 263.20 ± 73.27 mg h/L (380 mg). After PO administration, the C max, t 1/2 and AUC0-t at three doses were 9.25 ± 1.02 μg/mL, 1.79 ± 0.50 h and 31.90 ± 4.76 mg h/L (125 mg); 9.75 ± 1.77 μg/mL, 1.93 ± 0.65 h and 42.69 ± 8.93 mg h/L (250 mg); 15.55 ± 6.65 μg/mL, 2.02 ± 0.54 h, and 68.72 ± 24.11 mg h/L (500 mg). The IV f% T > MIC90 was greater than PO f% T > MIC90 when MIC90 was within the range of 0.25-256 mg/L.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cefetamet; Intravnous; Oral; Phmarcodynamics; Phmarcokinetics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25016476     DOI: 10.1007/s13318-014-0217-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0378-7966            Impact factor:   2.441


  21 in total

1.  LC method for the analysis of cefetamet pivoxil hydrochloride in drug substance and powder for oral suspension.

Authors:  Lisoni M Morsch; Celso F Bittencourt; Marinês J e Souza; Julie Milano
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 3.935

Review 2.  The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic approach to a rational dosage regimen for antibiotics.

Authors:  P L Toutain; J R E del Castillo; A Bousquet-Mélou
Journal:  Res Vet Sci       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.534

3.  Comparison of the pharmacodynamics of biapenem in bronchial epithelial lining fluid in healthy volunteers given half-hour and three-hour intravenous infusions.

Authors:  Eiki Kikuchi; Junko Kikuchi; Yasuyuki Nasuhara; Satoshi Oizumi; Akitoshi Ishizaka; Masaharu Nishimura
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Pharmacodynamics of cefprozil against Haemophilus influenzae in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model.

Authors:  Patrick F Smith; Brian Tsuji; Brent M Booker; Alan Forrest; Sanela Bajic; Pamela Kelchlin; Sujata M Bhavnani; Ronald N Jones; Paul G Ambrose
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 2.803

5.  Pharmacokinetics of intravenous cefetamet and oral cefetamet pivoxil in patients with renal insufficiency.

Authors:  J Kneer; Y K Tam; R A Blouin; F J Frey; E Keller; C Stathakis; B Luginbuehl; K Stoeckel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Cefetamet pivoxil. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use.

Authors:  H M Bryson; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Interaction between pivaloylcarnitine and L-carnitine transport into L6 cells overexpressing hOCTN2.

Authors:  Liliane Todesco; Michael Bodmer; Karin Vonwil; Daniel Häussinger; Stephan Krähenbühl
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 5.192

Review 8.  Determination of third-generation cephalosporins by high-performance liquid chromatography in connection with pharmacokinetic studies.

Authors:  F Péhourcq; C Jarry
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  1998-07-03       Impact factor: 4.759

9.  Evaluation of area under the inhibitory curve (AUIC) and time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (T>MIC) as predictors of outcome for cefepime and ceftazidime in serious bacterial infections.

Authors:  Peggy S McKinnon; Joseph A Paladino; Jerome J Schentag
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 5.283

10.  [Prediction of plasma protein binding of cephalosporins from polar molecular surface areas].

Authors:  Xu-chun Fu; Fang Ke; Shu-yu Zhan
Journal:  Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2007-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.