BACKGROUND: Objective measures for preoperative risk assessment are needed to inform surgical risk stratification. Previous studies using preoperative imaging have shown that the psoas muscle is a significant predictor of postoperative outcomes. Because psoas measurements are not always available, additional trunk muscles should be identified as alternative measures of risk assessment. Our research assessed the relationship between paraspinous muscle area, psoas muscle area, and surgical outcomes. METHODS: Using the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative database, we retrospectively identified 1309 surgical patients who had preoperative abdominal computerized tomography scans within 90 d of operation. Analytic morphomic techniques were used to measure the cross-sectional area of the paraspinous muscle at the T12 vertebral level. The primary outcome was 1-y mortality. Analyses were stratified by sex, and logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between muscle area and postoperative outcome. RESULTS: The measurements of paraspinous muscle area at T12 were normally distributed. There was a strong correlation between paraspinous muscle area at T12 and total psoas area at L4 (r = 0.72, P <0.001). Paraspinous area was significantly associated with 1-y mortality in both females (odds ratio = 0.70 per standard deviation increase in paraspinous area, 95% confidence interval 0.50-0.99, P = 0.046) and males (odds ratio = 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.47-0.88, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Paraspinous muscle area correlates with psoas muscle area, and larger paraspinous muscle area is associated with lower mortality rates after surgery. This suggests that the paraspinous muscle may be an alternative to the psoas muscle in the context of objective measures of risk stratification.
BACKGROUND: Objective measures for preoperative risk assessment are needed to inform surgical risk stratification. Previous studies using preoperative imaging have shown that the psoas muscle is a significant predictor of postoperative outcomes. Because psoas measurements are not always available, additional trunk muscles should be identified as alternative measures of risk assessment. Our research assessed the relationship between paraspinous muscle area, psoas muscle area, and surgical outcomes. METHODS: Using the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative database, we retrospectively identified 1309 surgical patients who had preoperative abdominal computerized tomography scans within 90 d of operation. Analytic morphomic techniques were used to measure the cross-sectional area of the paraspinous muscle at the T12 vertebral level. The primary outcome was 1-y mortality. Analyses were stratified by sex, and logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between muscle area and postoperative outcome. RESULTS: The measurements of paraspinous muscle area at T12 were normally distributed. There was a strong correlation between paraspinous muscle area at T12 and total psoas area at L4 (r = 0.72, P <0.001). Paraspinous area was significantly associated with 1-y mortality in both females (odds ratio = 0.70 per standard deviation increase in paraspinous area, 95% confidence interval 0.50-0.99, P = 0.046) and males (odds ratio = 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.47-0.88, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Paraspinous muscle area correlates with psoas muscle area, and larger paraspinous muscle area is associated with lower mortality rates after surgery. This suggests that the paraspinous muscle may be an alternative to the psoas muscle in the context of objective measures of risk stratification.
Authors: K Chughtai; Y Song; P Zhang; B Derstine; E Gatza; J Friedman; L Hully; C Inglis; S Goldstein; J Magenau; A Pawarode; P Reddy; M Riwes; G Yanik; S C Wang; S W Choi Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2015-11-09 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Robert D Boutin; Sara Bamrungchart; Cyrus P Bateni; Daniel P Beavers; Kristen M Beavers; John P Meehan; Leon Lenchik Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: B A Derstine; S A Holcombe; R L Goulson; B E Ross; N C Wang; J A Sullivan; G L Su; S C Wang Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Carrie A Kubiak; Kavitha Ranganathan; Niki Matusko; Jon A Jacobson; Stewart C Wang; Pauline K Park; Benjamin L Levi Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2018-10-11 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Katerina Deike-Hofmann; Lukas Gutzweiler; Julia Reuter; Daniel Paech; Jessica C Hassel; Oliver Sedlaczek; Alexander Radbruch; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Philipp Bäumer Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-07-05 Impact factor: 4.379