Literature DB >> 25016094

Human proximal femur bone adaptation to variations in hip geometry.

M M Machado1, P R Fernandes2, V Zymbal3, F Baptista4.   

Abstract

The study of bone mass distribution at proximal femur may contribute to understand the role of hip geometry on hip fracture risk. We examined how bone mineral density (BMD) of proximal femur adapts to inter individual variations in the femoral neck length (FNL), femoral neck width (FNW) and neck shaft angle (NSA). A parameterized and dimensionally scalable 3-D finite element model of a reference proximal femur geometry was incrementally adjusted to adopt physiological ranges at FNL (3.90-6.90cm), FNW (2.90-3.46cm), and NSA (109-141º), yielding a set of femora with different geometries. The bone mass distribution for each femur was obtained with a suitable bone remodelling model. The BMDs at the integral femoral neck (FN) and at the intertrochanteric (ITR) region, as well as the BMD ratio of inferomedial to superolateral (IM:SL) regions of FN and BMD ratio of FN:ITR were used to represent bone mass distribution. Results revealed that longer FNLs present greater BMD (g/cm(3)) at the FN, mainly at the SL region, and at the ITR region. Wider FNs were associated with reduced BMD at the FN, particularly at the SL region, and at the ITR region. Larger NSAs up to 129° were associated with BMD diminutions at the FN and ITR regions and with increases of the IM:SL BMD ratio while NSAs larger than 129° resulted in decrease of the IM:SL BMD ratio. These findings suggest hip geometry as moderator of the mechanical loading influence on bone mass distribution at proximal femur with higher FNL favoring the BMD of FN and ITR regions and greater FNW and NSA having the opposite effect. Augmented values of FNL and FNW seem also to favor more the BMD at the superolateral than at the inferomedial FN region.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanics; bone adaptation; bone mineral density; hip geometry; proximal femur

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25016094     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  7 in total

Review 1.  [The great apophyses: Functional strain and relevance].

Authors:  B Heimkes
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Initial displacement as a risk factor for avascular necrosis of the femoral head in pediatric femoral neck fractures: a review of one hundred eight cases.

Authors:  Wentao Wang; Yiqiang Li; Yueming Guo; Ming Li; Haibo Mei; Jingfan Shao; Zhu Xiong; Jin Li; Federico Canavese; Shunyou Chen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Association between femur size and a focal defect of the superior femoral neck.

Authors:  A H Gee; G M Treece; C J Tonkin; D M Black; K E S Poole
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Influence of the proximal screws of buttress plates on the stability of vertical femoral neck fractures: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Shi Zhan; Dajun Jiang; Jian Xu; Ming Ling; Kai Yang; Yuehua Li; Weitao Jia; Hai Hu; Changqing Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Histomorphometric bone assessment in patients with fracture of the proximal end of the femur.

Authors:  Caio Gonçalves de Souza; Márcio Passini Gonçalves de Souza; Vanda Jorgetti; Luciene Machado Dos Reis
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.513

6.  How does the femoral cortex depend on bone shape? A methodology for the joint analysis of surface texture and shape.

Authors:  A H Gee; G M Treece; K E S Poole
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  Biomechanical comparison of five cannulated screw fixation strategies for young vertical femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Dajun Jiang; Shi Zhan; Lei Wang; Lewis L Shi; Ming Ling; Hai Hu; Weitao Jia
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.494

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.