BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage is an effective treatment for many abscesses in the abdomen. We review our experience with EUS-guided drainage of pelvic abscesses. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients who underwent EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage were evaluated after excluding three patients with distance to transducer >2 cm or organized abscess. RESULTS: Thirty patients (25 male) aged 60 ± 4.5 years (mean ± SD) had 4 prostatic abscesses, 7 perisigmoid abscesses, and 19 perirectal abscesses with mean ± SD sizes of 2.5 ± 0.3, 4.7 ± 0.6, and 5.4 ± 0.4 cm, respectively. Surgery was the most common predisposing factor (n = 14, 46.6 %) followed by diverticulitis (n = 5, 16.6 %). Interventions included aspiration only (2 prostatic and 3 perisigmoid), aspiration and dilatation (2 patients in each group), and dilatation and stenting (2 perisigmoid and 17 perirectal). Five (16.6 %) patients needed re-intervention, and two (6.6 %) needed surgery. There were no recurrences. Technical success of EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage overall was 90.9 % (30/33) and was 93.3 % (27/30) in patients in whom EUS-guided drainage was attempted, with 16.5 % (n = 5) re-intervention rate. CONCLUSION: EUS-guided drainage has an excellent success rate in drainage of pelvic abscesses.
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage is an effective treatment for many abscesses in the abdomen. We review our experience with EUS-guided drainage of pelvic abscesses. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients who underwent EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage were evaluated after excluding three patients with distance to transducer >2 cm or organized abscess. RESULTS: Thirty patients (25 male) aged 60 ± 4.5 years (mean ± SD) had 4 prostatic abscesses, 7 perisigmoid abscesses, and 19 perirectal abscesses with mean ± SD sizes of 2.5 ± 0.3, 4.7 ± 0.6, and 5.4 ± 0.4 cm, respectively. Surgery was the most common predisposing factor (n = 14, 46.6 %) followed by diverticulitis (n = 5, 16.6 %). Interventions included aspiration only (2 prostatic and 3 perisigmoid), aspiration and dilatation (2 patients in each group), and dilatation and stenting (2 perisigmoid and 17 perirectal). Five (16.6 %) patients needed re-intervention, and two (6.6 %) needed surgery. There were no recurrences. Technical success of EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage overall was 90.9 % (30/33) and was 93.3 % (27/30) in patients in whom EUS-guided drainage was attempted, with 16.5 % (n = 5) re-intervention rate. CONCLUSION: EUS-guided drainage has an excellent success rate in drainage of pelvic abscesses.
Authors: Mukesh G Harisinghani; Debra A Gervais; Peter F Hahn; Chie Hee Cho; Kartik Jhaveri; Jose Varghese; Peter R Mueller Journal: Radiographics Date: 2002 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Mukesh G Harisinghani; Debra A Gervais; Michael M Maher; Che Hee Cho; Peter F Hahn; Jose Varghese; Peter R Mueller Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-07-24 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: L Brusciano; V Maffettone; V Napolitano; G Izzo; G Rossetti; D Izzo; F Russo; G Russo; G del Genio; A del Genio Journal: Ann Ital Chir Date: 2004 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 0.766
Authors: Anuradha Saokar; Ronald S Arellano; Debra A Gervais; Peter R Mueller; Peter F Hahn; Susanna I Lee Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 3.959