M Yang1, G Prestage2, B Maycock3, G Brown4, J de Wit5, M McKechnie1, R Guy1, P Keen1, C K Fairley6, I B Zablotska1. 1. The Kirby Institute, The University of New South Wales Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 2. The Kirby Institute, The University of New South Wales Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia The Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 3. Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. 4. The Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. 5. Centre for Social Research in Health, The University of NSW Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 6. Melbourne School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Central Clinical School, Monash University, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We explored the attitudes of Australian gay and other men who have sex with men (GMSM) about the current standard-of-care (non-rapid tests at healthcare settings) and alternative approaches (rapid tests and testing in non-healthcare settings) to better understand the acceptability of alternative testing approaches. METHODS: The Contemporary Norms in Networks and Communities of GMSM study enrolled GMSM in Sydney, Melbourne and Perth in 2011-2012 using peer referrals. We explored the self-reported preferences for testing: rapid versus non-rapid and in non-healthcare settings (community-based or home-based testing) versus in healthcare settings, and examined factors associated with preferences for these approaches. Analyses of associations used standard univariate and age-adjusted logistic regression models. RESULTS: Among 827 sexually active non-HIV-positive participants, 89% had been tested for HIV. Most preferred by participants was home rapid testing (46%), followed by standard-of-care (23%) and rapid testing in healthcare (20%) or community settings (7%). About 73% of participants preferred rapid over non-rapid testing, and 56% preferred testing in non-healthcare settings rather than in healthcare settings. Preference for rapid testing was associated with being fully employed (adjusted OR (aOR): 1.81; 95% CI 1.16 to 2.82), managerial/professional occupation (aOR: 2.03; 95% CI 1.19 to 3.46) and engaging in unprotected anal intercourse with casual partners (aOR: 1.89; 95% CI 1.29 to 2.78). The same factors were associated with preference for testing in non-healthcare settings. CONCLUSIONS: Australian GMSM prefer alternative testing approaches, possibly due to their convenience. The availability of new testing approaches may provide more options for GMSM at risk for HIV infection, improve access to HIV testing and potentially increase HIV testing rates. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
BACKGROUND: We explored the attitudes of Australian gay and other men who have sex with men (GMSM) about the current standard-of-care (non-rapid tests at healthcare settings) and alternative approaches (rapid tests and testing in non-healthcare settings) to better understand the acceptability of alternative testing approaches. METHODS: The Contemporary Norms in Networks and Communities of GMSM study enrolled GMSM in Sydney, Melbourne and Perth in 2011-2012 using peer referrals. We explored the self-reported preferences for testing: rapid versus non-rapid and in non-healthcare settings (community-based or home-based testing) versus in healthcare settings, and examined factors associated with preferences for these approaches. Analyses of associations used standard univariate and age-adjusted logistic regression models. RESULTS: Among 827 sexually active non-HIV-positive participants, 89% had been tested for HIV. Most preferred by participants was home rapid testing (46%), followed by standard-of-care (23%) and rapid testing in healthcare (20%) or community settings (7%). About 73% of participants preferred rapid over non-rapid testing, and 56% preferred testing in non-healthcare settings rather than in healthcare settings. Preference for rapid testing was associated with being fully employed (adjusted OR (aOR): 1.81; 95% CI 1.16 to 2.82), managerial/professional occupation (aOR: 2.03; 95% CI 1.19 to 3.46) and engaging in unprotected anal intercourse with casual partners (aOR: 1.89; 95% CI 1.29 to 2.78). The same factors were associated with preference for testing in non-healthcare settings. CONCLUSIONS: Australian GMSM prefer alternative testing approaches, possibly due to their convenience. The availability of new testing approaches may provide more options for GMSM at risk for HIV infection, improve access to HIV testing and potentially increase HIV testing rates. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Authors: Damian P Conway; Martin Holt; Deborah L Couldwell; Don E Smith; Stephen C Davies; Anna McNulty; Phillip Keen; Philip Cunningham; Rebecca Guy Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: Kathleen E Ryan; Alisa Pedrana; David Leitinger; Anna L Wilkinson; Peter Locke; Margaret E Hellard; Mark Stoové Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2017-10-10 Impact factor: 2.655