Literature DB >> 25015646

Large-scale genetic survey provides insights into the captive management and reintroduction of giant pandas.

Lei Shan1, Yibo Hu1, Lifeng Zhu1, Li Yan1, Chengdong Wang2, Desheng Li3, Xuelin Jin4, Chenglin Zhang5, Fuwen Wei6.   

Abstract

The captive genetic management of threatened species strives to preserve genetic diversity and avoid inbreeding to ensure populations remain available, healthy, and viable for future reintroduction. Determining and responding to the genetic status of captive populations is therefore paramount to these programs. Here, we genotyped 19 microsatellite loci for 240 captive giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) (∼64% of the captive population) from four breeding centers, Wolong (WL), Chengdu (CD), Louguantai (LGT), and Beijing (BJ), and analyzed 655 bp of mitochondrial DNA control region sequence for 220 of these animals. High levels of genetic diversity and low levels of inbreeding were estimated in the breeding centers, indicating that the captive population is genetically healthy and deliberate further genetic input from wild animals is unnecessary. However, the LGT population faces a higher risk of inbreeding, and significant genetic structure was detected among breeding centers, with LGT-CD and WL-BJ clustering separately. Based on these findings, we highlight that: 1) the LGT population should be managed as an independent captive population to resemble the genetic distinctness of their Qinling Mountain origins; 2) exchange between CD and WL should be encouraged because of similar wild founder sources; 3) the selection of captive individuals for reintroduction should consider their geographic origin, genetic background, and genetic contribution to wild populations; and 4) combining our molecular genetic data with existing pedigree data will better guide giant panda breeding and further reduce inbreeding into the future.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  captive management; genetic diversity; giant panda; inbreeding; reintroduction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25015646     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msu210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of genetic characteristics between captive and wild giant pandas based on 13 mitochondrial coding genes.

Authors:  Yixin Zhu; Tao Deng; Maiju Qiao; Dan Tang; Xiaoyu Huang; Wenwen Deng; Huan Liu; Rengui Li; Tianming Lan
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  The genetic consequences of captive breeding, environmental change and human exploitation in the endangered peninsular pronghorn.

Authors:  Anastasia Klimova; Jesus Neftalí Gutiérrez-Rivera; Victor Sánchez-Sotomayor; Joseph Ivan Hoffman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Reintroduction of confiscated and displaced mammals risks outbreeding and introgression in natural populations, as evidenced by orang-utans of divergent subspecies.

Authors:  Graham L Banes; Biruté M F Galdikas; Linda Vigilant
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Genetic composition of captive panda population.

Authors:  Jiandong Yang; Fujun Shen; Rong Hou; Yang Da
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 2.797

5.  Gut microbiota in reintroduction of giant panda.

Authors:  Jingsi Tang; Chengdong Wang; Hemin Zhang; Jiangchao Zhao; Wei Guo; Sudhanshu Mishra; Fanli Kong; Bo Zeng; Ruihong Ning; Desheng Li; Jiandong Yang; Mingyao Yang; Mingwang Zhang; Qingyong Ni; Yan Li; Ying Li
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 6.  Parasites of the Giant Panda: A Risk Factor in the Conservation of a Species.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Yue Xie; Youle Zheng; Chengdong Wang; Desheng Li; Anson V Koehler; Robin B Gasser
Journal:  Adv Parasitol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 3.870

7.  Genomic Inbreeding and Relatedness in Wild Panda Populations.

Authors:  John R Garbe; Dzianis Prakapenka; Cheng Tan; Yang Da
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.