D Shickle1, T M Farragher1. 1. Academic Unit of Public Health, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Charles Thackrah Building, 101 Clarendon Road, Leeds LS2 9LJ, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Preventable sight loss is an indicator within the Public Health Outcome Framework 2013-2018 for England. Routinely available optometric data do not permit small area analysis of access inequalities. METHODS: Data were extracted from 17 680 General Ophthalmic Services (GOS1) claim forms for eye examinations conducted in Leeds during February and March 2011. The expected number of GOS1 uptake for each lower super output area was based on the GOS1 national annual uptake. A Poisson regression model was used to explore associations in the GOS1 uptake ratio with deprivation and gender. RESULTS: People aged 60 or over or under 16 living in the least deprived quintile are 71 and 23%, respectively, more likely to have an NHS-funded eye examination than someone in that age group in the most deprived quintile, although all are equally entitled. Uptake is higher in the more deprived quintiles among 16-59 year olds, as means tested social benefits are the main eligibility criteria in this age group. There were no statistically significant gender differences in uptake. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions are needed to address eye examination uptake inequalities. However, in order to better inform commissioning and planning eye care services more complete data with additional detail are required. GOS1 forms ought to be submitted electronically linked to additional demographic and clinical data to allow public health analysis. Ideally, private eye examination data should also be captured.
BACKGROUND: Preventable sight loss is an indicator within the Public Health Outcome Framework 2013-2018 for England. Routinely available optometric data do not permit small area analysis of access inequalities. METHODS: Data were extracted from 17 680 General Ophthalmic Services (GOS1) claim forms for eye examinations conducted in Leeds during February and March 2011. The expected number of GOS1 uptake for each lower super output area was based on the GOS1 national annual uptake. A Poisson regression model was used to explore associations in the GOS1 uptake ratio with deprivation and gender. RESULTS:People aged 60 or over or under 16 living in the least deprived quintile are 71 and 23%, respectively, more likely to have an NHS-funded eye examination than someone in that age group in the most deprived quintile, although all are equally entitled. Uptake is higher in the more deprived quintiles among 16-59 year olds, as means tested social benefits are the main eligibility criteria in this age group. There were no statistically significant gender differences in uptake. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions are needed to address eye examination uptake inequalities. However, in order to better inform commissioning and planning eye care services more complete data with additional detail are required. GOS1 forms ought to be submitted electronically linked to additional demographic and clinical data to allow public health analysis. Ideally, private eye examination data should also be captured.
Authors: Darren Shickle; Tracey M Farragher; Chris J Davey; Sarah V Slade; James Syrett Journal: J Public Health (Oxf) Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 2.341
Authors: Hui-Chuan Hsu; Jersey Liang; Dih-Ling Luh; Chen-Fen Chen; Ying-Wei Wang Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-08-20 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Craig Wilde; Ali Poostchi; Georgios D Panos; Jonathan G Hillman; Hamish K MacNab; Harminder Dua; Winfried M Amoaku; Stephen A Vernon Journal: J Ophthalmol Date: 2022-09-15 Impact factor: 1.974
Authors: Stephanie Kearney; Niall C Strang; Jim Lewsey; Augusto Azuara-Blanco; Sven Jonuscheit Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2021-04-19 Impact factor: 3.775