The role of laparoscopy-assisted renal autotransplantation in the treatment of primary ureteral tumor.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect and safety of laparoscopy-assisted renal autotransplantation treatment for primary ureteral cancer (PUC).
METHODS: Medical records of patients undergoing hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy–extracorporeal total ureterectomy–renal autotransplantation–pyelocystostomy (Lap AutoTx) were analyzed. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative data were assessed.
RESULTS: Fifteen patients diagnosed with PUC underwent this novel approach. Three kidneys were abandoned owing to the detection of residual cancer on the renal pelvic junction, surgeon’s judgment on three severe atherosclerotic arteries, and palpable pelvic lymph nodes proven to be evidence of metastatic disease by frozen section analysis. Twelve patients (mean ± SD age 67.5 ± 7.5 years) were treated with Lap AutoTx for PUC successfully. No perioperative mortality occurred. One patient with solitary kidney experienced delayed graft function that required short-term hemodialysis. Three recurrent superficial diseases in three patients were treated with transurethral resection. The mean ± SD follow-up duration was 12.1 ± 6.7 months (range 3–24 months). The renal pelvicaliceal system was easily examined by flexible cystoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: Lap AutoTx is less invasive compared with the traditional two-incisional manner and can be performed safely even among elderly patients. Compared with other currently used therapies, this novel treatment can be used to successfully treat PUC with the added advantages of total resection of the ureteral lesion, preservation of the renal function, and simplification of follow-up procedures.Primary ureteral cancer (PUC) is an aggressive disease and has a poor prognosis.1 Studies have shown high prevalence and invasiveness of PUC in Taiwan.2,3 Nephroureterectomy with excision of the bladder cuff is still believed to be the gold standard treatment for PUC.4 Most PUC occurs among individuals aged more than 60 years, and most of these patients are also at high risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD).5,6 Nephroureterectomy not only results in excessive loss of renal function, but also puts the patient at risk of CKD, which contributes to the progression of end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis. In addition, diminished renal function after nephroureterectomy compromises the possible use of adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced disease.Endoscopic surgery (ES) and segmental resection (SR) can be used for renal preservation in PUC cases, but there still are limitations to these approaches, and indefinite invasive ureteroscopy is required during follow-up. Only a few studies have focused on renal autotransplantation (AutoTx) after extracorporeal total ureterectomy (ETU) for PUC. This type of treatment possesses advantages of total resection of malignant ureteral lesions, preservation of renal function, and simplification of follow-up protocols. In two reported case series, all cases involved surgery performed with the traditional 2-incision approach, and only a few cases involved pure PUC.7,8 We have reported that hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy (HARNU) for the treatment of PUC is less invasive and results in better functional outcomes with fewer complications and comparable oncologic control compared with open nephroureterectomy.9 In this study, we report our experience of this treatment combined with ETU and AutoTx for pure PUC.