| Literature DB >> 25014101 |
Szi-Wen Chen1, Jiunn-Woei Liaw2, Hsiao-Lung Chan3, Ya-Ju Chang4, Chia-Hao Ku5.
Abstract
A real-time muscle fatigue monitoring system was developed to quantitatively detect the muscle fatigue of subjects during cycling movement, where a fatigue progression measure (FPM) was built-in. During the cycling movement, the electromyogram (EMG) signals of the vastus lateralis and gastrocnemius muscles in one leg as well as cycling speed are synchronously measured in a real-time fashion. In addition, the heart rate (HR) and the Borg rating of perceived exertion scale value are recorded per minute. Using the EMG signals, the electrical activity and median frequency (MF) are calculated per cycle. Moreover, the updated FPM, based on the percentage of reduced MF counts during cycling movement, is calculated to measure the onset time and the progressive process of muscle fatigue. To demonstrate the performance of our system, five young healthy subjects were recruited. Each subject was asked to maintain a fixed speed of 60 RPM, as best he/she could, under a constant load during the pedaling. When the speed reached 20 RPM or the HR reached the maximal training HR, the experiment was then terminated immediately. The experimental results show that the proposed system may provide an on-line fatigue monitoring and analysis for the lower extremity muscles during cycling movement.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25014101 PMCID: PMC4168434 DOI: 10.3390/s140712410
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1.System setup for the proposed real-time fatigue monitoring and analysis for lower extremity muscle. The cycling-based system is consisting of a physical bicycle equipped with a resistor, crank angle detector and the wireless 2-channel EMG sensors with sensor interface device.
Figure 2.Schematic block diagram of overall system configuration.
Figure 3.Display of kinematical data and analysis using LabView windows. In these windows, cycling speed, EMG signals, MFs and EAs of both the VL and GAS muscles for each cycle are shown.
Figure 4.Real-time profiling of a typical test obtained from the proposed system: (a) raw EMG; (b) FFT-based spectrum of the raw EMG signal; (c) MF estimates derived from the EMG; (d) FPM tracings; (e) EA estimates derived from the EMG; and (f) HR measurements.
Figure 5.FPMs of VL and GAS muscles versus time for (a) S1 and S2 under L2 load; (b) S3 and S4 under L3 load; and (c) S5 under L4 load.
Onset times of muscle fatigue (both GAS and VL) and Borg = 13 (indicating that the exercise intensity is “somewhat hard”) of the subjects under different loads. Note that for each subject the Borg scale value was updated every minute during the test.
| L2 | S1 | Female | 20 s | 1 min | 2 min | 3 min |
| S2 | Female | 0 | 40 s | 2 min | 7 min | |
|
| ||||||
| L3 | S3 | Male | 0 | 20 s | 1 min | 2 min 40 s |
| S4 | Male | 3 min 40 s | 0 | 4 min | 36 min | |
|
| ||||||
| L4 | S5 | Male | 2 min 40 s | 1 min | 3 min | 23 min |