| Literature DB >> 25013967 |
Juan J Lu1, Dun Y Tan1, Jerry M Baskin2, Carol C Baskin3.
Abstract
Seed morph, abiotic conditions and time of germination can affect plant fitness, but few studies have tested their combined effects on plasticity of plant life history traits. Thus, we tested the hypothesis that seed morph, germination season and watering regime influence phenotypic expression of post-germination life history traits in the diaspore-heteromorphic cold desert winter annual/spring ephemeral Diptychocarpus strictus. The two seed morphs were sown in watered and non-watered plots in late summer, and plants derived from them were watered or not-watered throughout the study. Seed morph did not affect phenology, growth and morphology, survival, dry mass accumulation and allocation or silique and seed production. Seeds in watered plots germinated in autumn (AW) and spring (SW) but only in spring for non-watered plots (SNW). A high percentage of AW, SW and SNW plants survived and reproduced, but flowering date and flowering period of autumn- vs. spring-germinated plants differed. Dry mass also differed with germination season/watering regime (AW > SW > SNW). Number of siliques and seeds increased with plant size (AW > SW > SNW), whereas percent dry mass allocated to reproduction was higher in small plants: SNW > SW > AW. Thus, although seed morph did not affect the expression of life history traits, germination season and watering regime significantly affected phenology, plant size and accumulation and allocation of biomass to reproduction. Flexibility throughout the life cycle of D. strictus is an adaptation to the variation in timing and amount of rainfall in its cold desert habitat.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25013967 PMCID: PMC4094427 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Comparison of monthly (A) and annual (B) rainfall in Urümqi, China, for 2001–2005, 2008, and 2009 (data from Xinjiang Agricultural Weather Station located near the experimental garden study plots); (C) Number of seedlings of Diptychocarpus strictus emerged (mean ±1 s.e.) each week in watered and non-watered plots in the experimental garden during autumn 2008 and spring 2009.
AW, autumn-germinating plants watered; SW, spring-germinating plants watered; ANW, autumn-germinating plants not-watered; SNW, spring-germinating plants not-watered. In (A) and (C), only standard errors ≥0.39% and ≥2.31% are shown, respectively.
Figure 2Experimental design of study on Diptychocarpus strictus.
Summary of a two-way ANOVA showing the effects of different germination season/watering regime treatments (T) (i.e. AW, SW and SNW) and seed morph (S) on phenology, survival, morphology and number and mass of siliques and of seeds from Diptychocarpus strictus offspring.
| I | T | S | T×S | |
|
| 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Phenology | ||||
| Emergence date | 6.31* | 8964.58** | 3.36 | 0.13 |
| Flowering date | 0.49 | 120.98** | 1.78 | 1.89 |
| Fruiting date | 2.39 | 37.17** | 0.59 | 1.04 |
| Flowering period | 9.77** | 63.06** | 0.92 | 1.71 |
| Post-germination life span | 0.97 | 5258.65** | 3.84 | 0.10 |
| Survival percentage, S′/N(%) | 3.68 | 10.63** | 1.58 | 2.52 |
| Percentage survival to reproduction, R/S′ | 0.58 | 1.70 | 2.12 | 2.38 |
| Morphology | ||||
| Plant height at maturity | 3.63 | 249.98** | 0.12 | 1.51 |
| Number per individual plant | ||||
| Upper siliques | 2.31 | 70.45** | 0.17 | 0.61 |
| Lower siliques | 0.39 | 56.59** | 0.04 | 0.37 |
| Seeds from upper siliques | 3.77 | 50.79** | 0.02 | 0.23 |
| Seeds from lower siliques | 1.56 | 26.47** | 0.00 | 0.10 |
| Ratio | ||||
| Upper/lower silique number ratio | 0.33 | 13.18** | 0.03 | 0.26 |
| Seed number ratio from upper/lower siliques | 0.51 | 18.29** | 0.04 | 0.07 |
| Upper/lower silique mass ratio | 2.81 | 32.53** | 0.23 | 0.25 |
| Seed mass ratio from upper/lower siliques | 0.64 | 18.97** | 0.15 | 0.14 |
Initial size (I) refers to the diameter of seedling at four-leaf rosette stage, which was a covariate (see text). The F ratios given are based on Type III sums of squares. *P<0.05; **P<0.001. S′, number of plants that survived to four-leaf rosette stage during treatment; N, total number of germinated seedlings; R, number of surviving four-leaf rosette plants that reproduced during treatment.
Effect of germination season/watering regime on phenology, survival, morphology and silique and seed production of plants in Diptychocarpus strictus (mean ±1 s.e.).
| AW | SW | SNW | |
| Phenology | |||
| Emergence date (d) | 34.90±0.25a | 211.18±0.48b | 214.00±0.60c |
| Flowering date (d) | 248.65±0.57a | 256.78±0.39b | 263.87±0.25c |
| Fruiting date (d) | 277.52±0.33a | 280.35±0.41b | 283.62±0.32c |
| Flowering period (d) | 40.75±0.32b | 34.30±0.22a | 32.75±0.39a |
| Post-germination life span (l, d) | 242.63±0.87b | 72.37±0.37a | 71.33±0.32a |
| Survival percentage, S′/N (%) | 100.00±0.00b | 98.78±0.46b | 94.77±1.26a |
| Percentage survival to reproduction, R/S′ (%) | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 98.61±0.94a |
| Morphology | |||
| Plant height at maturity (H, cm) | 52.99±0.40c | 34.61±0.51b | 24.24±0.62a |
| Silique and seed production per individual | |||
| Number of upper siliques | 89.73±3.39c | 23.67±1.21b | 7.47±0.55a |
| Number of lower siliques | 48.88±1.89c | 15.58±0.83b | 7.83±0.48a |
| Number of seeds from upper siliques | 2890.12±127.01c | 692.02±37.26b | 200.77±15.00a |
| Number of seeds from lower siliques | 964.90±51.63c | 283.23±16.91b | 156.80 ±10.30a |
AW, autumn-germinating plants watered; SW, spring-germinating plants watered; SNW, spring plants not-watered. S′, number of plants that survived to four-leaf rosette stage during treatment; N, total number of germinated seedlings; R, number of surviving four-leaf rosette plants that reproduced during treatment; H, plant height at maturity; l, life period. Different lowercase letters (a, b, c) indicate significant differences (Tukey's HSD, P = 0.05).
Note: Dates for emergence, flowering and fruiting are number of days (d) since sowing. Flowering interval, interval from blooming of first flower to withering of last flower; post-germination life span, interval from emergence to death.
Figure 3Effect of germination season/watering regime on dry mass accumulation (A) and allocation (B) (mean ±1 s.e) in Diptychocarpus strictus.
AW, autumn-germinating plants watered; SW, spring-germinating plants watered; SNW, spring-germinating plants not-watered. Bars with different letters for total dry mass (A) or for portions of bars for dry mass allocation (B) indicate significant difference in multiple range comparison (Tukey's HSD, P = 0.05).
Figure 4Effects of germination season/watering regime on number ratios and mass ratios of siliques and of seeds per individual (mean ±1 s.e.) in Diptychocarpus strictus.
AW, autumn-germinating plants watered; SW, spring-germinating plants watered; SNW, spring-germinating plants not-watered. Bars with different letters within each of the four ratio categories are significantly different in multiple range comparison (Tukey's HSD, P = 0.05).