Literature DB >> 2501394

Topical antibiotics in the treatment of superficial skin infections in general practice--a comparison of mupirocin with sodium fusidate.

D G White1, P O Collins, R B Rowsell.   

Abstract

A total of 413 eligible patients took part in an observer-blind randomised multicentre clinical trial in order to compare the clinical and bacteriological efficacy of mupirocin (Bactroban) ointment with sodium fusidate (Fucidin) ointment for treating superficial skin infections seen in general practice. Mupirocin was applied twice daily and sodium fusidate thrice daily for a period of 7 days. Both treatments were similarly effective with 97% patients treated with mupirocin and 93% patients treated with sodium fusidate responding. Mupirocin was significantly more effective in the treatment of acute primary skin infections and in the treatment of a subgroup of patients with impetigo (P less than 0.01). Of the organisms detected before treatment began, 93% were not found after treatment with mupirocin compared with 89% after treatment with sodium fusidate. Staphylococcus aureus and/or beta-haemolytic streptococci appeared to be eliminated in significantly more patients treated with mupirocin (96%) compared with those treated with sodium fusidate (88%), (P = 0.03). Both treatments were well tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2501394     DOI: 10.1016/s0163-4453(89)80058-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect        ISSN: 0163-4453            Impact factor:   6.072


  12 in total

1.  Efficacy of a new cream formulation of mupirocin: comparison with oral and topical agents in experimental skin infections.

Authors:  J Gisby; J Bryant
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  New MCC qualifying exam causing confusion and anxiety, interns and residents say.

Authors:  L S Williams
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Trends in Canadian Birth Weights, 1971 to 1989: Studying weight trends in singleton births.

Authors:  S Wadhera; W J Millar; C Nimrod
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Modelling of the outcome of non-inferiority trials by integration of historical data.

Authors:  Alberto Russu; Erik van Zwet; Giuseppe De Nicolao; Oscar Della Pasqua
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2011-08-21       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 5.  Staphylococcal skin infections in children: rational drug therapy recommendations.

Authors:  Shamez Ladhani; Mehdi Garbash
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 6.  Interventions for impetigo.

Authors:  Sander Koning; Renske van der Sande; Arianne P Verhagen; Lisette W A van Suijlekom-Smit; Andrew D Morris; Christopher C Butler; Marjolein Berger; Johannes C van der Wouden
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-01-18

Review 7.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatments for impetigo.

Authors:  Ajay George; Greg Rubin
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Mupirocin vs terbinafine in impetigo.

Authors:  Ergin Ciftci; Haluk Guriz; Ahmet Derya Aysev
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 9.  Fusidic acid resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  D Dobie; J Gray
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  In Vitro Activity of the Bacteriophage Endolysin HY-133 against Staphylococcus aureus Small-Colony Variants and Their Corresponding Wild Types.

Authors:  Nina Schleimer; Ursula Kaspar; Dennis Knaack; Christof von Eiff; Sonja Molinaro; Holger Grallert; Evgeny A Idelevich; Karsten Becker
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.