| Literature DB >> 25013293 |
Young-Jeoi Yoon1, Byung-Hoon Lee2.
Abstract
[Purpose] This study was conducted to investigate the effect of balance and gait training on the recovery of the motor function in a Parkinson's disease animal models.Entities:
Keywords: Balance training; Gait training; Parkinson’s disease
Year: 2014 PMID: 25013293 PMCID: PMC4085218 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.26.905
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Phys Ther Sci ISSN: 0915-5287
Experimental group design
| Group (n=40) | |
| Group I (n=10) | Saline induced non-PDa |
| Group II (n=10) | Non-treatment after PD-induced by MPTP |
| Group III (n=10) | Balance training after PD-induced by MPTP |
| Group IV (n=10) | Gait training after PD-induced by MPTP |
a Parkinson’s disease
The results of the pole tests in each group (unit: sec)
| Pre | After 7 days | After 14 days | After 21 days | After 28 days | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I | 2.33±0.51 | 2.35±0.53 | 2.51±0.86 | 2.41±0.74 | 2.39±0.53 |
| Group II | 64.73±3.46* | 59.19±5.90* | 57.56±6.52* | 56.11±5.45* | 55.58±6.69* |
| Group III | 65.53±3.00* | 48.60±5.04*# | 29.50±4.95*# | 22.95±6.96*# | 5.02±1.29# |
| Group IV | 65.35±4.80* | 35.67±5.41*#† | 28.82±9.30*# | 18.62±7.22*# | 3.55±1.47# |
Values are expressed as the Mean±SD. Tested by one-way ANOVA, and as a post-hoc test. Tukey’s multiple range test was also performed, *: p<0.05 as compared to Group I; #: p<0.05 as compared to Group II ; †: p<0.05 as compared to Group III
The results of the open field test in each group (unit: sec)
| Pre | After 7 days | After 14 days | After 21 days | After 28 days | |
| Group I | 20.54±2.52 | 19.45±2.89 | 20.01±2.62 | 16.28±3.25 | 16.10±2.01 |
| Group II | 300.00±0.00* | 300.00±0.00* | 292.45±6.39* | 288.42±4.82* | 285.41±5.83* |
| Group III | 300.00±0.00* | 297.10±5.04* | 284.30±8.94* | 262.00±8.36*# | 245.00±13.27*# |
| Group IV | 300.00±0.00* | 290.20±9.08*#† | 274.15±7.21*#† | 240.05±5.56*#† | 215.07±5.94*#† |
Values are expressed as the Mean±SD. Tested by one-way ANOVA, and as a post-hoc test. Tukey’s multiple range test was also performed, *: p<0.05 as compared to Group I; #: p<0.05 as compared to Group II ; †: p<0.05 as compared to Group III
Fig. 1.The expression of tyrosine hydroxylase in each groups