Literature DB >> 25013157

Using the glucometrics website to benchmark ICU glucose control before and after the NICE-SUGAR study.

Ranee R Lleva1, Prem Thomas2, Janis E Bozzo3, Karrie C Hendrickson3, Silvio E Inzucchi4.   

Abstract

Prior to 2009, intensive glycemic control was the standard in main intensive care units (ICUs). Glucose targets have been recalibrated after publication of the NICE-SUGAR study in that year, followed by updated guidelines that endorsed more moderated control. We sought to determine if the prevalence of hyperglycemia in US ICUs had increased after the NICE-SUGAR study's results were reported. We used data from hospitals submitted to the Yale Glucometrics™ website to assess mean blood glucose values, percentage of blood glucose within various ranges, and the prevalence of hypo- and hyperglycemic excursions, based on the patient-day method, comparing the pre- to post-NICE-SUGAR time period. Among more than a total of 2 million blood glucose determinations, comprising 408 790 patient-days, median patient-day blood glucose decreased from 144 mg/dL to 141 mg/dL (P < .001) in the pre- versus post-NICE-SUGAR time period. The percentage of patient days with a mean blood glucose of 110-179 mg/dl increased from 58.3 to 63.6%. The percentage of patient-days with either hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dl) or severe hyperglycemia (≥300 mg/dl) decreased during this time. Our results suggest that glycemic control in US ICUs has improved when comparing time periods before versus after publication of the NICE-SUGAR study. We found no evidence that fewer hypoglycemic events were achieved at the expense of more hyperglycemia.
© 2014 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NICE-SUGAR study; diabetes; glucometrics; glucose; hospital; inpatient

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25013157      PMCID: PMC4455376          DOI: 10.1177/1932296814540871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  17 in total

1.  Prevalence of hyper- and hypoglycemia among inpatients with diabetes: a national survey of 44 U.S. hospitals.

Authors:  Deborah J Wexler; James B Meigs; Enrico Cagliero; David M Nathan; Richard W Grant
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2008.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Glucose control in the ICU--how tight is too tight?

Authors:  Silvio E Inzucchi; Mark D Siegel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  An internet service supporting quality assessment of inpatient glycemic control.

Authors:  Prem Thomas; Silvio E Inzucchi
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-05

Review 5.  American College of Endocrinology and American Diabetes Association Consensus statement on inpatient diabetes and glycemic control.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  "Glucometrics"--assessing the quality of inpatient glucose management.

Authors:  Philip A Goldberg; Janis E Bozzo; Prem G Thomas; Melinda M Mesmer; Olga V Sakharova; Martha J Radford; Silvio E Inzucchi
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.118

7.  Inpatient management of diabetes and hyperglycemia.

Authors:  Magdalena Bogun; Silvio E Inzucchi
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.393

8.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction).

Authors:  Elliott M Antman; Daniel T Anbe; Paul Wayne Armstrong; Eric R Bates; Lee A Green; Mary Hand; Judith S Hochman; Harlan M Krumholz; Frederick G Kushner; Gervasio A Lamas; Charles J Mullany; Joseph P Ornato; David L Pearle; Michael A Sloan; Sidney C Smith; Joseph S Alpert; Jeffrey L Anderson; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Raymond J Gibbons; Gabriel Gregoratos; Jonathan L Halperin; Loren F Hiratzka; Sharon Ann Hunt; Alice K Jacobs
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-08-03       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Intensive insulin therapy and pentastarch resuscitation in severe sepsis.

Authors:  Frank M Brunkhorst; Christoph Engel; Frank Bloos; Andreas Meier-Hellmann; Max Ragaller; Norbert Weiler; Onnen Moerer; Matthias Gruendling; Michael Oppert; Stefan Grond; Derk Olthoff; Ulrich Jaschinski; Stefan John; Rolf Rossaint; Tobias Welte; Martin Schaefer; Peter Kern; Evelyn Kuhnt; Michael Kiehntopf; Christiane Hartog; Charles Natanson; Markus Loeffler; Konrad Reinhart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Glycaemic control in Australia and New Zealand before and after the NICE-SUGAR trial: a translational study.

Authors:  Kirsi-Maija Kaukonen; Michael Bailey; David Pilcher; Neil Orford; Simon Finfer; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Improvement in inpatient glycemic care: pathways to quality.

Authors:  Joseph A Aloi; Christopher Mulla; Jagdeesh Ullal; David C Lieb
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 2.  Diabetic emergencies - ketoacidosis, hyperglycaemic hyperosmolar state and hypoglycaemia.

Authors:  Guillermo Umpierrez; Mary Korytkowski
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 43.330

3.  Effect of beta blocker use and type on hypoglycemia risk among hospitalized insulin requiring patients.

Authors:  Kathleen Dungan; Jennifer Merrill; Clarine Long; Philip Binkley
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 9.951

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.