Literature DB >> 25012838

Improving patient safety in the radiation oncology setting through crew resource management.

Srinath Sundararaman1, Angela E Babbo2, John A Brown3, Richard Doss4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This paper demonstrates how the communication patterns and protocol rigors of a methodology called crew resource management (CRM) can be adapted to a radiation oncology environment to create a culture of patient safety. CRM training was introduced to our comprehensive radiation oncology department in the autumn of 2009. With 34 full-time equivalent staff, we see 100-125 patients daily on 2 hospital campuses. We were assisted by a consulting group with considerable experience in helping hospitals incorporate CRM principles and practices. Implementation steps included developing change initiative skills for key leaders, providing training in teamwork and communications, creating site-specific tools for safety and efficiency, and collecting data to document results. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Our goals were to improve patient safety, teamwork, communication, and efficiency through the use of tools we developed that emphasized teamwork and communication, cross-checking, and routinizing specific protocols. Our CRM plan relies on the following 4 pillars: patient identification methods; "pause for the cause"; enabling all staff to halt treatment and question decisions; and daily morning meetings. We discuss some of the hurdles to change we encountered.
RESULTS: Our safety record has improved. Our near-miss rate before CRM implementation averaged 11 per month; our near-miss rate currently averages 1.2 per month. In the 5 years prior to CRM implementation, we experienced 1 treatment deviation per year, although none rose to the level of "mis-administration." Since implementing CRM, our current patient treatment setup and delivery process has eliminated all treatment deviations. Our practices have identified situations where ambiguity or conflicting documentation could have resulted in inappropriate treatment or treatment inefficiencies. Our staff members have developed an extraordinary sense of teamwork combined with a high degree of personal responsibility to assure patient safety and have spoken up when they considered something potentially unsafe. We have increased our efficiency (and profitability); in 2012, our units of service were up 11.3% over 2009 levels with the same staffing level.
CONCLUSIONS: The rigor and standardization introduced into our practice, combined with the increase in communication and teamwork have improved both safety and efficiency while improving both staff and patient satisfaction. CRM principles are highly adaptable and applicable to the radiation oncology setting.
© 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 25012838     DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2013.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1879-8500


  5 in total

1.  Advancing the Future of Patient Safety in Oncology: Implications of Patient Safety Education on Cancer Care Delivery.

Authors:  Ted A James; Michael Goedde; Tania Bertsch; Dennis Beatty
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Crew resource management training in healthcare: a systematic review of intervention design, training conditions and evaluation.

Authors:  Benedict Gross; Leonie Rusin; Jan Kiesewetter; Jan M Zottmann; Martin R Fischer; Stephan Prückner; Alexandra Zech
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Clinical practice workflow in Radiation Oncology should be highly standardized.

Authors:  Per Halvorsen; Nilendu Gupta; Yi Rong
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 4.  What Do We Really Know About Crew Resource Management in Healthcare?: An Umbrella Review on Crew Resource Management and Its Effectiveness.

Authors:  Martina Buljac-Samardžić; Connie M Dekker-van Doorn; M Travis Maynard
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Guidelines for treatment naming in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Travis R Denton; Lisa B E Shields; Michael Hahl; Casey Maudlin; Mark Bassett; Aaron C Spalding
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 2.102

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.