Jordan Teague1, E Anna Johnston, Jay P Graham. 1. George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, 950 New Hampshire Ave NW, Suite 400, Washington DC, 20052, USA, jlteague14@gmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study explores the integration of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) and nutrition programming for improved child health outcomes and aims to identify barriers to and necessary steps for successful integration. METHODS: Sixteen semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with key stakeholders from both the WASH and nutrition sectors, exploring barriers to integration and potential steps to more effectively integrate programs. RESULTS: Key barriers included insufficient and siloed funding, staff capacity and interest, knowledge of the two sectors, coordination, and limited evidence on the impact of integrated programs. To achieve more effective integration, respondents highlighted the need for more holistic strategies that consider both sectors, improved coordination, donor support and funding, a stronger evidence base for integration, and leadership at all levels. CONCLUSIONS: Organizations desiring to integrate programs can use these results to prepare for challenges and to know what conditions are necessary for successfully integrated programs. Donors should encourage integration and fund operational research to improve the efficiency of integration efforts. Knowledge among sectors should be shared and incentives should be designed to facilitate better coordination, especially where both sectors are working toward common goals.
OBJECTIVES: This study explores the integration of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) and nutrition programming for improved child health outcomes and aims to identify barriers to and necessary steps for successful integration. METHODS: Sixteen semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with key stakeholders from both the WASH and nutrition sectors, exploring barriers to integration and potential steps to more effectively integrate programs. RESULTS: Key barriers included insufficient and siloed funding, staff capacity and interest, knowledge of the two sectors, coordination, and limited evidence on the impact of integrated programs. To achieve more effective integration, respondents highlighted the need for more holistic strategies that consider both sectors, improved coordination, donor support and funding, a stronger evidence base for integration, and leadership at all levels. CONCLUSIONS: Organizations desiring to integrate programs can use these results to prepare for challenges and to know what conditions are necessary for successfully integrated programs. Donors should encourage integration and fund operational research to improve the efficiency of integration efforts. Knowledge among sectors should be shared and incentives should be designed to facilitate better coordination, especially where both sectors are working toward common goals.
Authors: Alan D Dangour; Louise Watson; Oliver Cumming; Sophie Boisson; Yan Che; Yael Velleman; Sue Cavill; Elizabeth Allen; Ricardo Uauy Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2013-08-01
Authors: Sheri D Weiser; Sera L Young; Craig R Cohen; Margot B Kushel; Alexander C Tsai; Phyllis C Tien; Abigail M Hatcher; Edward A Frongillo; David R Bangsberg Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2011-11-16 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Robert E Black; Cesar G Victora; Susan P Walker; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Parul Christian; Mercedes de Onis; Majid Ezzati; Sally Grantham-McGregor; Joanne Katz; Reynaldo Martorell; Ricardo Uauy Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-06-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Tahmeed Ahmed; Robert E Black; Simon Cousens; Kathryn Dewey; Elsa Giugliani; Batool A Haider; Betty Kirkwood; Saul S Morris; H P S Sachdev; Meera Shekar Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-02-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Claire Dorion; Paul R Hunter; Rafael Van den Bergh; Carme Roure; Pascale Delchevalerie; Tony Reid; Peter Maes Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-12-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Audrie Lin; Benjamin F Arnold; Sadia Afreen; Rie Goto; Tarique Mohammad Nurul Huda; Rashidul Haque; Rubhana Raqib; Leanne Unicomb; Tahmeed Ahmed; John M Colford; Stephen P Luby Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2013-04-29 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Christa L Fischer Walker; Igor Rudan; Li Liu; Harish Nair; Evropi Theodoratou; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Katherine L O'Brien; Harry Campbell; Robert E Black Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-04-12 Impact factor: 79.321