Literature DB >> 25012729

Estimating effectiveness and cost of biologics for rheumatoid arthritis: application of a validated algorithm to commercial insurance claims.

Jeffrey R Curtis1, Vernon F Schabert2, David J Harrison3, Jason Yeaw2, Jonathan R Korn2, Caroleen Quach4, Huifeng Yun5, George J Joseph3, David H Collier6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this analysis was to implement a claims-based algorithm to estimate biologic cost per effectively treated patient for biologics approved for moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
METHODS: This retrospective analysis included commercially insured adults (aged 18-63 years) with RA in a commercial database, who initiated biologic treatment with abatacept, adalimumab, etanercept, golimumab, or infliximab between 2007 and 2010. The algorithm defined effectiveness as having all of the following: high adherence, no biologic dose increase, no biologic switching, no new nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, no increased or new oral glucocorticoid use, and no more than 1 glucocorticoid injection. For each biologic, cost per effectively treated patient was defined as total drug and administration costs (from allowed amounts on claims), divided by the number of patients categorized as effectively treated.
FINDINGS: Of 15,351 patients, 12,018 (78.3%) were women, and the mean (SD) age was 49.7 (9.6) years. The algorithm categorized treatment as effective in the first year for 30% (1899/6374) of etanercept, 30% (1396/4661) of adalimumab, 20% (560/2765) of infliximab, 27% (361/1338) of abatacept, and 29% (62/213) of golimumab treated patients. The 1-year biologic cost per effectively treated patient, as defined by the algorithm, was nominally lower for subcutaneously injected biologics than for infused biologics. The 1-year biologic cost per effectively treated patient, as defined by the algorithm, was lowest for etanercept ($49,952), followed by golimumab ($50,189), adalimumab ($52,858), abatacept ($71,866), and infliximab ($104,333). IMPLICATIONS: Algorithm-defined effectiveness was similar for biologics other than infliximab. The 1-year biologic cost per effectively treated patient, as defined by the algorithm, was nominally lower for subcutaneously injected biologics than for infused biologics.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  algorithm; biologics; claims; cost; effectiveness; rheumatoid arthritis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25012729     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.05.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  10 in total

Review 1.  Comparative effectiveness research with administrative health data in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Marie Hudson; Koray Tascilar; Samy Suissa
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 20.543

2.  Are abatacept and tocilizumab intravenous users willing to switch for the subcutaneous route of administration? A questionnaire-based study.

Authors:  Marie Desplats; Tristan Pascart; Germain Jelin; Laurène Norberciak; Peggy Philippe; Eric Houvenagel; Vincent Goeb; René-Marc Flipo
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Therapy and the Risk for Depression Among Working-Age Adults with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Arijita Deb; Nilanjana Dwibedi; Traci LeMasters; Jo Ann Hornsby; Wenhui Wei; Usha Sambamoorthi
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2019-02

4.  Application of a validated algorithm to estimate the effectiveness and cost of biologics for rheumatoid arthritis in the US pharmacy benefit manager context.

Authors:  Ning Wu; Sharvari Bhurke; Neel Shah; David J Harrison
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2015-05-13

Review 5.  Claims Data Analysis of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Treatment Dosing Among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review of Methods.

Authors:  Gundula Krack; Henning Zeidler; Jan Zeidler
Journal:  Drugs Real World Outcomes       Date:  2016-09

6.  Treatment effectiveness and treatment patterns among rheumatoid arthritis patients after switching from a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor to another medication.

Authors:  Machaon Mk Bonafede; Jeffrey R Curtis; Donna McMorrow; Puneet Mahajan; Chieh-I Chen
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2016-12-02

7.  Cost-effectiveness of evolocumab in treatment of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia in Bulgaria: measuring health benefit by effectively treated patient-years.

Authors:  Borislav Borissov; Michael Urbich; Boryana Georgieva; Svetoslav Tsenov; Guillermo Villa
Journal:  J Mark Access Health Policy       Date:  2017-12-22

8.  Costs associated with failure to respond to treatment among patients with rheumatoid arthritis initiating TNFi therapy: a retrospective claims analysis.

Authors:  Michael Grabner; Natalie N Boytsov; Qing Huang; Xiang Zhang; Tingjian Yan; Jeffrey R Curtis
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 5.156

9.  Effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis: a cohort study.

Authors:  Marina Amaral de Ávila Machado; Cristiano Soares de Moura; Steve Ferreira Guerra; Jeffrey R Curtis; Michal Abrahamowicz; Sasha Bernatsky
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 5.156

10.  Comparing Biologic Cost Per Treated Patient Across Indications Among Adult US Managed Care Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Tao Gu; Neel Shah; Gaurav Deshpande; Derek H Tang; Debra F Eisenberg
Journal:  Drugs Real World Outcomes       Date:  2016-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.