C-W Ryu1, G-H Jahng2, H S Shin3. 1. From the Departments of Radiology (C.-W.R., G.-H.J.) md.cwryu@gmail.com. 2. From the Departments of Radiology (C.-W.R., G.-H.J.). 3. Neurosurgery (H.S.S.), Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: High-resolution MR imaging can depict intracranial arterial atherosclerotic plaques. Our aim was to evaluate the relationship between the degree of enhancement of MCA plaques on contrast-enhanced high-resolution MR imaging and ischemic stroke and stenosis severity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study enrolled 36 patients diagnosed with moderate-to-severe atherosclerotic MCA stenosis. A contrast-enhanced T1-weighted volume isotropic turbo spin-echo acquisition sequence was acquired for assessing plaque enhancement. Plaque-to-CSF contrast ratio was calculated after the signal intensity of plaques at the stenotic segment was measured. Univariate comparison and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed for symptomatic and asymptomatic groups to assess the relationship between symptomatic stenosis and independent variables, including plaque-to-CSF contrast ratio, degree of stenosis, and clinical risk factors. Plaque-to-CSF contrast ratio was compared between the moderate and severe stenosis groups. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients had symptomatic MCA stenosis, and 15 had asymptomatic stenosis. The plaque-to-CSF contrast ratio was significantly higher in the symptomatic group than in the asymptomatic group (63.6 ± 10.6% versus 54.1 ± 13.5%, respectively; P < .05). The degree of stenosis also differed significantly between the 2 groups (P < .05). Multivariate analysis revealed that the degree of stenosis was the only independent predictor of ischemic stroke symptoms. The plaque-to-CSF contrast ratio of severe stenosis was significantly higher than that of moderate stenosis (66.8 ± 8.7% versus 55.9 ± 12.8%, respectively; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Plaque enhancement was significantly higher in patients with symptomatic plaques and may have been affected by the degree of stenosis. A difference in plaque enhancement according to the degree of stenosis has implications for understanding the development of intracranial atherosclerotic plaques.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: High-resolution MR imaging can depict intracranial arterial atherosclerotic plaques. Our aim was to evaluate the relationship between the degree of enhancement of MCA plaques on contrast-enhanced high-resolution MR imaging and ischemic stroke and stenosis severity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study enrolled 36 patients diagnosed with moderate-to-severe atherosclerotic MCA stenosis. A contrast-enhanced T1-weighted volume isotropic turbo spin-echo acquisition sequence was acquired for assessing plaque enhancement. Plaque-to-CSF contrast ratio was calculated after the signal intensity of plaques at the stenotic segment was measured. Univariate comparison and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed for symptomatic and asymptomatic groups to assess the relationship between symptomatic stenosis and independent variables, including plaque-to-CSF contrast ratio, degree of stenosis, and clinical risk factors. Plaque-to-CSF contrast ratio was compared between the moderate and severe stenosis groups. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients had symptomatic MCA stenosis, and 15 had asymptomatic stenosis. The plaque-to-CSF contrast ratio was significantly higher in the symptomatic group than in the asymptomatic group (63.6 ± 10.6% versus 54.1 ± 13.5%, respectively; P < .05). The degree of stenosis also differed significantly between the 2 groups (P < .05). Multivariate analysis revealed that the degree of stenosis was the only independent predictor of ischemic stroke symptoms. The plaque-to-CSF contrast ratio of severe stenosis was significantly higher than that of moderate stenosis (66.8 ± 8.7% versus 55.9 ± 12.8%, respectively; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Plaque enhancement was significantly higher in patients with symptomatic plaques and may have been affected by the degree of stenosis. A difference in plaque enhancement according to the degree of stenosis has implications for understanding the development of intracranial atherosclerotic plaques.
Authors: Marc I Chimowitz; Michael J Lynn; Harriet Howlett-Smith; Barney J Stern; Vicki S Hertzberg; Michael R Frankel; Steven R Levine; Seemant Chaturvedi; Scott E Kasner; Curtis G Benesch; Cathy A Sila; Tudor G Jovin; Jose G Romano Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-03-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: William S Kerwin; Kevin D O'Brien; Marina S Ferguson; Nayak Polissar; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan Journal: Radiology Date: 2006-09-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: K D O'Brien; M D Allen; T O McDonald; A Chait; J M Harlan; D Fishbein; J McCarty; M Ferguson; K Hudkins; C D Benjamin Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 1993-08 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Mike P Wattjes; Götz G Lutterbey; Michael Harzheim; Jürgen Gieseke; Frank Träber; Luisa Klotz; Thomas Klockgether; Hans H Schild Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-04-04 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: John C Benson; Heidi Cheek; Marie C Aubry; Giuseppe Lanzino; John Huston Iii; Alejandro Rabinstein; Waleed Brinjikji Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2021-01-04 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Jae W Song; Brianna F Moon; Morgan P Burke; Srikant Kamesh Iyer; Mark A Elliott; Haochang Shou; Steven R Messé; Scott E Kasner; Laurie A Loevner; Mitchell D Schnall; John E Kirsch; Walter R Witschey; Zhaoyang Fan Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2020-05-11 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Jiayu Xiao; Matthew M Padrick; Tao Jiang; Shuang Xia; Fang Wu; Yu Guo; Nestor R Gonzalez; Shujuan Li; Konrad H Schlick; Oana M Dumitrascu; Marcel M Maya; Marcio A Diniz; Shlee S Song; Patrick D Lyden; Debiao Li; Qi Yang; Zhaoyang Fan Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2021-01-11 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: S Jiao; J Huang; Y Chen; Y Song; T Gong; J Lu; T Guo; J Zhang; C Zhang; M Chen Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-12-03 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Jae W Song; Athanasios Pavlou; Morgan P Burke; Haochang Shou; Kofi-Buaku Atsina; Jiayu Xiao; Laurie A Loevner; David Mankoff; Zhaoyang Fan; Scott E Kasner Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2020-10-07 Impact factor: 2.995