| Literature DB >> 25012526 |
Yuqi Liu, Zongwei Liu, Xiaoming Li, Bangwei Luo, Jian Xiong, Woting Gan, Man Jiang, Zhiyuan Zhang, Hermann J Schluesener, Zhiren Zhang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Glial scar formation is a common histopathological feature of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Astrogliosis and expression of transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) are key components of scar formation and blood-brain barrier modulation. Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) is considered a cytokine mediating the effects of TGF-β.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25012526 PMCID: PMC4227000 DOI: 10.1186/1746-1596-9-141
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagn Pathol ISSN: 1746-1596 Impact factor: 2.644
Figure 1Accumulation of connective tissue growth factor(CTGF) non-neuron cells in traumatic brain injury. A: In normal brains, CTGF immunoreactivity was occasionally observed in the brain tissue. The boxed area indicates CTGF immunoreactivity in small vessels. B: Almost all ependymal cells showed CTGF+. C-H: The accumulation of CTGF+ cells in the lesioned regions at 18 h (C), 6 h (D), 24 h (E), 48 h (F), 72 h (G) and 96 h (H). Arrows indicate the accumulation of CTGF+ non-neuron cells with astrocytes phenotype in the cortex and meningeal (C). CTGF immunoreactivity was also detected in endothelial cells (F). A significant increase in CTGF+ non-neuron cells was observed confined to the lesion at 72 h postinjury (G). The boxed area indicates the localization of CTGF+ non-neuron cells that were mainly identified as astrocytes with typical stellate morphologic characteristics or belt-shaped, grouped pattern. The accumulation of CTGF+ non-neuron cells reached the maximum at 96-h postinjury (H). Scale bars are 50 μm.
Figure 2The time course of parenchymal connective tissue growth factor(CTGF) non-neuron cell accumulation in traumatic brain injury. The numbers of CTGF+ cells of every rat brain were counted in eight high-power fields. We only counted positive cells with the nucleus at the focal plane. Results are presented as arithmetic means of positive cells per high-power field and SEM. Statistical analysis was carried out using one-way analysis of variance, followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test (GraphPad Prism 4.0 Software). **P < 0.01 compared with the normal control.