Zlatko Devcic1, Jarrett Rosenberg2, Arthur J A Braat3, Tust Techasith1, Arjun Banerjee1, Daniel Y Sze1, Marnix G E H Lam4. 1. Division of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. 2. Radiology Sciences Laboratory, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; and. 3. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, UMC Utrecht, The Netherlands. 4. Division of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, UMC Utrecht, The Netherlands m.lam@umcutrecht.nl.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: (90)Y resin radioembolization is an emerging treatment in patients with liver-dominant metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (mNETs), despite the absence of level I data. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of this modality in a meta-analysis of the published literature. METHODS: A comprehensive review protocol screened all reports in the literature. Strict selection criteria were applied to ensure consistency among the selected studies: human subjects, complete response data with time interval, resin microspheres, more than 5 patients, not a duplicate cohort, English language, and separate and complete data for resin-based (90)Y treatment of mNET if the study included multiple tumor and microsphere types. Selected studies were critically appraised on 50 study criteria, in accordance with the research reporting standards for radioembolization. Response data (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) were extracted and analyzed using both fixed and random-effects meta-analyses. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-six studies were screened; 12 were selected, totaling 435 procedures for response assessment. Funnel plots showed no evidence of publication bias (P = 0.841). Critical appraisal revealed a median of 75% of desired criteria included in selected studies. Very high between-study heterogeneity ruled out a fixed-effects model. The random-effects weighted average objective response rate (complete and partial responses, CR and PR, respectively) was 50% (95% confidence interval, 38%-62%), and weighted average disease control rate (CR, PR, and stable disease) was 86% (95% confidence interval, 78%-92%). The percentage of patients with pancreatic mNET was marginally associated with poorer response (P = 0.030), accounting for approximately 23% of the heterogeneity among studies. The percentage of CR and PR correlated with median survival (R = 0.85; P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis confirms radioembolization to be an effective treatment option for patients with hepatic mNET. The pooled data demonstrated a high response rate and improved survival for patients responding to therapy.
UNLABELLED: (90)Y resin radioembolization is an emerging treatment in patients with liver-dominant metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (mNETs), despite the absence of level I data. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of this modality in a meta-analysis of the published literature. METHODS: A comprehensive review protocol screened all reports in the literature. Strict selection criteria were applied to ensure consistency among the selected studies: human subjects, complete response data with time interval, resin microspheres, more than 5 patients, not a duplicate cohort, English language, and separate and complete data for resin-based (90)Y treatment of mNET if the study included multiple tumor and microsphere types. Selected studies were critically appraised on 50 study criteria, in accordance with the research reporting standards for radioembolization. Response data (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) were extracted and analyzed using both fixed and random-effects meta-analyses. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-six studies were screened; 12 were selected, totaling 435 procedures for response assessment. Funnel plots showed no evidence of publication bias (P = 0.841). Critical appraisal revealed a median of 75% of desired criteria included in selected studies. Very high between-study heterogeneity ruled out a fixed-effects model. The random-effects weighted average objective response rate (complete and partial responses, CR and PR, respectively) was 50% (95% confidence interval, 38%-62%), and weighted average disease control rate (CR, PR, and stable disease) was 86% (95% confidence interval, 78%-92%). The percentage of patients with pancreatic mNET was marginally associated with poorer response (P = 0.030), accounting for approximately 23% of the heterogeneity among studies. The percentage of CR and PR correlated with median survival (R = 0.85; P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis confirms radioembolization to be an effective treatment option for patients with hepatic mNET. The pooled data demonstrated a high response rate and improved survival for patients responding to therapy.
Authors: Alexander Villalobos; Mohamed M Soliman; Bill S Majdalany; David M Schuster; James Galt; Zachary L Bercu; Nima Kokabi Journal: Semin Intervent Radiol Date: 2020-12-11 Impact factor: 1.513
Authors: Dwight H Owen; Sandipkumar Patel; Lai Wei; John E Phay; Lawrence A Shirley; Lawrence S Kirschner; Carl Schmidt; Sherif Abdel-Misih; Pamela Brock; Manisha H Shah; Bhavana Konda Journal: Horm Cancer Date: 2019-08-29 Impact factor: 3.869
Authors: Nicholas Fidelman; Robert K Kerlan; Randall A Hawkins; Miguel Pampaloni; Andrew G Taylor; Maureen P Kohi; K Pallav Kolli; Chloe E Atreya; Emily K Bergsland; R Kate Kelley; Andrew H Ko; W Michael Korn; Katherine Van Loon; Ryan M McWhirter; Jennifer Luan; Curt Johanson; Alan P Venook Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2016-12
Authors: Jonathan R Strosberg; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Andrew M Bellizzi; Jennifer A Chan; Joseph S Dillon; Anthony P Heaney; Pamela L Kunz; Thomas M O'Dorisio; Riad Salem; Eva Segelov; James R Howe; Rodney F Pommier; Kari Brendtro; Mohammad A Bashir; Simron Singh; Michael C Soulen; Laura Tang; Jerome S Zacks; James C Yao; Emily K Bergsland Journal: Pancreas Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 3.327