Literature DB >> 25012031

Regulation of some salt defense-related genes in relation to physiological and biochemical changes in three sugarcane genotypes subjected to salt stress.

Wasinee Poonsawat1, Cattarin Theerawitaya, Therapatt Suwan, Chareerat Mongkolsiriwatana, Thapanee Samphumphuang, Suriyan Cha-um, Chalermpol Kirdmanee.   

Abstract

Sugarcane (Saccharum officinale L.; Poaceae) is a sugar-producing plant widely grown in tropic. Being a glycophytic species, it is very sensitive to salt stress, and salinity severely reduces growth rate and cane yield. The studies investigating the regulation of salt defense metabolite-related genes in relation to final biochemical products in both susceptible and tolerant genotypes of sugarcane are largely lacking. We therefore investigated the expression levels of sugarcane shaggy-like kinase (SuSK), sucrose transporter (SUT), proline biosynthesis (pyrolline-5-carboxylate synthetase; P5CS), ion homeostasis (NHX1), and catalase (CAT2) mRNAs, and contents of Na(+), soluble sugar, and free proline in three sugarcane genotypes (A19 mutant, K88-92, and K92-80) when subjected to salt stress (200 mM NaCl). The relative expression levels of salt defense-related genes in salt-stressed plantlets of sugarcane cv. K88-92 were upregulated in relation to salt exposure times when compared with glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as housekeeping gene. In addition, final biochemical products, i.e., low Na(+), sucrose enrichment, and free proline accumulation, were evidently demonstrated in salt-stressed plantlets. Chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, total carotenoid concentrations, and maximum quantum yield of PSII (F v/F m) in positive check (K88-92) were maintained under salt stress, leading to high net photosynthetic rate (P n) and growth retention (root length, fresh weight, and leaf area). In contrast, photosynthetic abilities in negative check, K92-80, and A19 mutant lines grown under salt stress declined significantly in comparison to control, leading to a reduction in P n and an inhibition of overall growth characters. The study concludes that the genetic background of sugarcane cv. K88-92 may further be exploited to play a key role as parental clone for sugarcane breeding program for salt-tolerant purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25012031     DOI: 10.1007/s00709-014-0676-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protoplasma        ISSN: 0033-183X            Impact factor:   3.356


  10 in total

1.  Antioxidative defense system, pigment composition, and photosynthetic efficiency in two wheat cultivars subjected to drought

Authors: 
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 2.  Chlorophyll fluorescence--a practical guide.

Authors:  K Maxwell; G N Johnson
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.992

3.  Biochemical characterization and identification of differentially expressed candidate genes in salt stressed sugarcane.

Authors:  Madhuri Chandrakant Pagariya; Rachayya Mallikarjun Devarumath; Prashant Govindrao Kawar
Journal:  Plant Sci       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 4.729

4.  Differentially delayed root proteome responses to salt stress in sugar cane varieties.

Authors:  Cinthya Mirella Pacheco; Maria Clara Pestana-Calsa; Fabio Cesar Gozzo; Rejane Jurema Mansur Custodio Nogueira; Marcelo Menossi; Tercilio Calsa
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  Acid-rain monitoring in east Asia with a portable-type ion-exclusion-cation-exchange chromatographic analyzer.

Authors:  K Tanaka; K Ohta; P R Haddad; J S Fritz; K P Lee; K Hasebe; A Ieuji; A Miyanaga
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  1999-07-30       Impact factor: 4.759

6.  Transcript expression profiling of stress responsive genes in response to short-term salt or PEG stress in sugarcane leaves.

Authors:  Vikas Yadav Patade; Sujata Bhargava; Penna Suprasanna
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 7.  Sugarcane for bioenergy production: an assessment of yield and regulation of sucrose content.

Authors:  Alessandro J Waclawovsky; Paloma M Sato; Carolina G Lembke; Paul H Moore; Glaucia M Souza
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 9.803

8.  Expression analysis of sugarcane shaggy-like kinase (SuSK) gene identified through cDNA subtractive hybridization in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.).

Authors:  Vikas Yadav Patade; Archana Neeraj Rai; Penna Suprasanna
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 3.356

9.  Possible involvement of some secondary metabolites in salt tolerance of sugarcane.

Authors:  Abdul Wahid; Alia Ghazanfar
Journal:  J Plant Physiol       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 3.549

10.  Comparison of different extraction and detection methods for sugars using amino-bonded phase HPLC.

Authors:  Mustafa Karkacier; Mustafa Erbas; Mustafa K Uslu; Mehmet Aksu
Journal:  J Chromatogr Sci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.618

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Investigating the roles of ascorbate-glutathione cycle and thiol metabolism in arsenate tolerance in ridged Luffa seedlings.

Authors:  Vijay Pratap Singh; Samiksha Singh; Jitendra Kumar; Sheo Mohan Prasad
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 3.356

2.  Expression levels of vacuolar ion homeostasis-related genes, Na+ enrichment, and their physiological responses to salt stress in sugarcane genotypes.

Authors:  Cattarin Theerawitaya; Rujira Tisarum; Thapanee Samphumphuang; Harminder Pal Singh; Teruhiro Takabe; Suriyan Cha-Um
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.356

3.  Salt stress induces changes in the proteomic profile of micropropagated sugarcane shoots.

Authors:  Lucas Z Passamani; Roberta R Barbosa; Ricardo S Reis; Angelo S Heringer; Patricia L Rangel; Claudete Santa-Catarina; Clícia Grativol; Carlos F M Veiga; Gonçalo A Souza-Filho; Vanildo Silveira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.