Literature DB >> 25012018

Prognostic factors of clinical outcome after neuronavigation-assisted hematoma drainage in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.

Woo-Keun Kwon1, Dong-Hyuk Park2, Kyung-Jae Park1, Shin-Hyuk Kang1, Jeong-Hyun Lee3, Tai-Hyoung Cho4, Yong-Gu Chung1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The prognostic factors that contribute to outcome after navigation-assisted drainage in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) have not been defined. We compared the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with spontaneous ICHs who underwent neuronavigation-assisted hematoma drainage.
METHODS: Forty-seven patients were enrolled from January 2004 to August 2013. The patients were divided into two groups according to Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores: the good- (GOS 4-5) and poor-outcome (GOS 1-3) groups. A variety of factors, characteristics, and clinical outcomes were analyzed.
RESULTS: Among the 47 patients, 16 and 31 showed good and poor outcomes, respectively. The mortality rate was 4.3%. Patients' ages, horizontal and vertical diameters and volume of the hematoma on the initial brain computed tomography scan, and the initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores were significantly different between the two groups (P<0.05). Ages less than 60 years, smaller horizontal and vertical diameters of the hematoma, less initial hematoma volume, higher initial GCS scores, and the absence of intraventricular hemorrhages were significantly associated with good outcome (P<0.05). Among these factors, initial hematoma volume was a borderline prognostic factor (odds ratio [OR], 0.951; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.904-1.001; P=0.054), whereas initial GCS score was a significant prognostic factor (OR, 2.737; 95% CI, 1.371-5.465; P=0.004), in the multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSION: Initial GCS score and hematoma volume were important prognostic factors of clinical outcome in patients with spontaneous ICHs who underwent navigation-assisted drainage. Such factors should be carefully considered before patients are treated with navigation-assisted hematoma drainage.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glasgow outcome scale; Hematoma drainage; Intracerebral hemorrhage; Neuronavigation; Prognostic factors

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25012018     DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg        ISSN: 0303-8467            Impact factor:   1.876


  3 in total

Review 1.  Intracerebral Hemorrhage Location and Functional Outcomes of Patients: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Anirudh Sreekrishnan; Jennifer L Dearborn; David M Greer; Fu-Dong Shi; David Y Hwang; Audrey C Leasure; Sonya E Zhou; Emily J Gilmore; Charles C Matouk; Nils H Petersen; Lauren H Sansing; Kevin N Sheth
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  The role of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in evaluating the prognosis of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  Fei Li; Qian-Xue Chen; Shou-Gui Xiang; Shi-Zhun Yuan; Xi-Zhen Xu
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Sonographic-Assisted Catheter-Positioning in Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Wolf-Dirk Niesen; Matthias Reinhard; Mortimer Gierthmuehlen; Hannah Fuhrer
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 4.003

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.