Literature DB >> 25011952

Lipid profiling reveals different therapeutic effects of metformin and glipizide in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease.

Yifei Zhang1, Chunxiu Hu2, Jie Hong1, Jun Zeng2, Shenghan Lai3, Ankang Lv1, Qing Su4, Yan Dong4, Zhiguang Zhou5, Weili Tang5, Jiajun Zhao6, Lianqun Cui6, Dajin Zou7, Dawang Wang8, Hong Li9, Chao Liu10, Guoting Wu11, Jie Shen12, Dalong Zhu13, Weiqing Wang1, Weifeng Shen1, Guang Ning14, Guowang Xu15.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We recently demonstrated a beneficial effect of metformin compared with glipizide in type 2 diabetic patients regarding cardiovascular outcomes for 3-year treatment in the SPREAD-DIMCAD study. However, the potential mechanism for the clinical effects remains unclear. Here, we performed a comprehensive lipidomics study to evaluate the different lipid metabolites in serum samples obtained from participants in this study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Liquid chromatography-quadrupole time of flight-mass spectrometry was used to evaluate the different lipid metabolites in serum samples obtained from the participants (21 patients in glipizide group and 23 patients in metformin group) before and after each year of treatment (at 0 [baseline], 1, 2, and 3 years of study drug administration).
RESULTS: A total of 118 serum lipid molecular species was identified and quantified. During treatment, metformin induced a substantially greater change in serum lipid species compared with glipizide, especially at the 2- and 3-year time points (with 2, 11, and 12 lipid species being significantly different between the groups after each year of treatment [1, 2, or 3 years], P < 0.05). Among the significantly changed lipid species, three lipid metabolites were linked to long-term composite cardiovascular events (adjusted P < 0.05). After treatment, triacylglycerols (TAGs) of a relatively higher carbon number showed a clearly increased trend in metformin group compared with the glipizide group, whereas the changes in TAGs with different double bonds were minimal.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings revealed the differential therapeutic effects of metformin and glipizide on comprehensive lipidomics, which were comparable with their different long-term effects on cardiovascular outcomes.
© 2014 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25011952     DOI: 10.2337/dc14-0090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  12 in total

1.  Discovery of potential biomarkers for osteoporosis using LC-MS/MS metabolomic methods.

Authors:  J Wang; D Yan; A Zhao; X Hou; X Zheng; P Chen; Y Bao; W Jia; C Hu; Z-L Zhang; W Jia
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Lipidomic profiling reveals distinct differences in plasma lipid composition in healthy, prediabetic, and type 2 diabetic individuals.

Authors:  Huanzi Zhong; Chao Fang; Yanqun Fan; Yan Lu; Bo Wen; Huahui Ren; Guixue Hou; Fangming Yang; Hailiang Xie; Zhuye Jie; Ye Peng; Zhiqiang Ye; Jiegen Wu; Jin Zi; Guoqing Zhao; Jiayu Chen; Xiao Bao; Yihe Hu; Yan Gao; Jun Zhang; Huanming Yang; Jian Wang; Lise Madsen; Karsten Kristiansen; Chuanming Ni; Junhua Li; Siqi Liu
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 6.524

Review 3.  Efficacy of Probiotics and Synbiotics in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Liang Liu; Ping Li; Yiqi Liu; Yilian Zhang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Lipidomic analysis enables prediction of clinical outcomes in burn patients.

Authors:  Peter Qi; Abdikarim Abdullahi; Mile Stanojcic; David Patsouris; Marc G Jeschke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Applying metabolomics to cardiometabolic intervention studies and trials: past experiences and a roadmap for the future.

Authors:  Naomi J Rankin; David Preiss; Paul Welsh; Naveed Sattar
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  The Associations between Apolipoprotein E Gene Epsilon2/Epsilon3/Epsilon4 Polymorphisms and the Risk of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Jian-Quan Luo; Huan Ren; Hoan Linh Banh; Mou-Ze Liu; Ping Xu; Ping-Fei Fang; Da-Xiong Xiang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 7.  Metformin in aging and aging-related diseases: clinical applications and relevant mechanisms.

Authors:  Sheng Chen; Donghao Gan; Sixiong Lin; Yiming Zhong; Mingjue Chen; Xuenong Zou; Zengwu Shao; Guozhi Xiao
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 11.600

8.  Why Should Metformin Not Be Given in Advanced Kidney Disease? Potential Leads from Computer Simulations.

Authors:  Visnja Kokic Males; Martina Požar
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-06-01

Review 9.  Molecular Mechanisms of Metformin for Diabetes and Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Min Li; Xiaoying Li; Huijie Zhang; Yan Lu
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Metabolic Profiling Reveals an Abnormal Pattern of Serum Fatty Acids in MRL/lpr Mice Under Treatment With Prednisone.

Authors:  Qianqian Li; Jia Zhou; Dingyi Zhang; Xiafeng Zhang; Zhenghao Xu; Dehong Wu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 5.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.