Literature DB >> 25011582

The influence of cervical plate fixation with either autologous bone or cage insertion on radiographic and patient-rated outcomes after two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Jan-Karl Burkhardt1, Anne F Mannion, Serge Marbacher, Frank S Kleinstück, Dezsö Jeszenszky, François Porchet.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to identify technique-related factors influencing radiographic and patient-rated outcomes after two-level anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) using either cage or autologous bone, with or without anterior plate fixation (APF).
METHODS: This single center study was nested within the Eurospine Spine Tango data acquisition system. INCLUSION CRITERIA: consecutive two-level ACDF patients (2004-2012) presenting with signs of degenerative cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy. Before and 12 month postoperatively, patients completed the multidimensional Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI); at 12 months postoperatively they also rated the global treatment outcome (GTO) and their satisfaction with care. Cervical lordosis and segmental height were assessed radiographically preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at the last follow-up (LFU) (18.2 ± 13.3 months).
RESULTS: One hundred and forty-four consecutive patients (113 with APF) were included. The use of APF versus stand-alone methods was associated with significantly increased segmental height (by 2.6 ± 2.6 versus 1.5 ± 2.4 mm, p = 0.04) and preservation of lordosis (by 2.7 ± 4.4° versus -1.7 ± 5°, p < 0.0001) at LFU, with comparable clinical outcome (COMI score reduction ≥3.1-point). Multiple regression controlling for potential confounders revealed that APF (p = 0.0004) and cage (p = 0.001) were associated with greater segmental height at LFU; APF was associated with a greater lordosis angle at LFU (p < 0.0001). Greater increase in segmental height at LFU (p = 0.02) was associated with a better GTO.
CONCLUSIONS: Adding APF was associated with greater segmental height and preservation of lordosis in two-level ACDF, especially using bone autograft, but also for cage. Clinical outcome was comparable for all groups. Though the surgical technique per se did not determine clinical outcome, patients achieving a greater segmental height difference showed a significantly better GTO.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25011582     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3456-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  20 in total

1.  Stand-alone cervical cages versus anterior cervical plate in 2-level cervical anterior interbody fusion patients: clinical outcomes and radiologic changes.

Authors:  Jae Keun Oh; Tae Yup Kim; Hyo Sang Lee; Nam Kyu You; Gwi Hyun Choi; Seong Yi; Yoon Ha; Keung Nyun Kim; Do Heum Yoon; Hyun Chul Shin
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2013-12

2.  SSE Spine Tango--content, workflow, set-up. www.eurospine.org-Spine Tango.

Authors:  C Röder; A Chavanne; A F Mannion; D Grob; M Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Operative treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Raj D Rao; Krishnaj Gourab; Kenny S David
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go?

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; Achim Elfering; Ralph Staerkle; Astrid Junge; Dieter Grob; Norbert K Semmer; Nicola Jacobshagen; Jiri Dvorak; Norbert Boos
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-06-04       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Anterior cervical fusion: the role of anterior plating.

Authors:  Scott D Daffner; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2009

6.  The efficacy of plate construct augmentation versus cage alone in anterior cervical fusion.

Authors:  Kyung-Jin Song; Cyrus E Taghavi; Kwang-Bok Lee; Ji-Hoon Song; Jong-Pil Eun
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Restoration and preservation of disc height and segmental lordosis with circumferential lumbar fusion: a retrospective analysis of cage versus bone graft.

Authors:  Michael C Liebensteiner; Guenther Jesacher; Martin Thaler; Michaela Gstoettner; Marlies V Liebensteiner; Christian M Bach
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2011-02

8.  Comparison of fusion with cage alone and plate instrumentation in two-level cervical degenerative disease.

Authors:  Yong-Hun Joo; Jong-Won Lee; Ki-Young Kwon; Jong-Joo Rhee; Hyun-Koo Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-10-30

9.  A comparison of outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty and fusion in everyday clinical practice: surgical and methodological aspects.

Authors:  Dieter Grob; Francois Porchet; Frank S Kleinstück; Friederike Lattig; Dezsoe Jeszenszky; Andrea Luca; Urs Mutter; Anne F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective. Part 1: the Core Outcome Measures Index in clinical practice.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; F Porchet; F S Kleinstück; F Lattig; D Jeszenszky; V Bartanusz; J Dvorak; D Grob
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  3 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes of locking stand-alone cage versus anterior plate construct in two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Victor M Lu; Ralph J Mobbs; Bernard Fang; Kevin Phan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Comparative Analysis of Interbody Cages Versus Tricortical Graft with Anterior Plate Fixation for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Degenerative Cervical Disc Disease.

Authors:  Pritish Singh; Ashok Kumar; Vishal Shekhawat
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-03-01

3.  Long-Term Follow-Up Results of Anterior Cervical Inter-Body Fusion with Stand-Alone Cages.

Authors:  Woong-Beom Kim; Seung-Jae Hyun; Hoyong Choi; Ki-Jeong Kim; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Hyun-Jib Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-07-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.