Literature DB >> 25011114

Bioaccumulation and risk assessment of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in wild freshwater fish from rivers in the Pearl River Delta region, South China.

Chang-Gui Pan1, Jian-Liang Zhao1, You-Sheng Liu1, Qian-Qian Zhang1, Zhi-Feng Chen1, Hua-Jie Lai1, Feng-Jiao Peng1, Shuang-Shuang Liu1, Guang-Guo Ying2.   

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are used in various industries, which results in their ubiquitous occurrence in the environment. This study determined the concentrations of eighteen PFASs in muscle and liver of nine wild freshwater fish species collected from rivers in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region, South China, and assessed their bioaccumulation and potential health risks to local people. The results showed that eight and twelve PFASs were detected in the fish muscle and liver samples, respectively. Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) was found to be the predominant PFAS both in muscle and liver with its highest concentrations of 79ng/g wet weight (ww) in muscle and 1500ng/g ww in liver, followed by Perfluoroundecanoic acid (PFUnDA) and Perfluorotridecanoic acid (PFTrDA) with trace concentrations. The mean PFOS concentrations in fish muscle and liver tissues of the nine collected species ranged from 0.40ng/g in mud carp to 25ng/g in snakehead, and from 5.6ng/g in mud carp to 1100ng/g in snakehead, respectively. Significant positive correlations were found among PFASs both in water and fish, indicating a similar pollution source for these PFASs. In tilapia samples, PFOS concentrations showed an increasing trend with increasing length and weight, but no significant difference between genders. Bioaccumulation factors (logBAF) in fish for the PFASs were in the range from 2.1 to 5.0. The calculated hazard ratios (HR) of PFOS for all fishes were in the range of 0.05-2.8, with four out of nine species (tilapia, chub, leather catfish and snakehead) having their HR values more than 1.0. The results suggest that frequent consumption of these four fish species may pose health risks to local population.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioaccumulation; Fish; PFASs; PFOS; Risk assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25011114     DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.05.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf        ISSN: 0147-6513            Impact factor:   6.291


  6 in total

Review 1.  Adverse Effects of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate on the Liver and Relevant Mechanisms.

Authors:  Pingwei Wang; Dongge Liu; Shuqi Yan; Jiajing Cui; Yujun Liang; Shuping Ren
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-05-19

2.  Tissue distribution of perfluoroalkyl acids and health status in wild Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) from Loskop Dam, Mpumalanga, South Africa.

Authors:  Jacqueline T Bangma; Jessica L Reiner; Hannes Botha; Theresa M Cantu; Marco A Gouws; Matthew P Guillette; Jeremy P Koelmel; Wilmien J Luus-Powell; Jan Myburgh; Olivia Rynders; Joseph R Sara; Willem J Smit; John A Bowden
Journal:  J Environ Sci (China)       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 5.565

3.  Geographical trends of PFAS in cod livers along the Norwegian coast.

Authors:  Stig Valdersnes; Bente M Nilsen; Joar F Breivik; Asbjørn Borge; Amund Maage
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Occurrence of perfluoroalkyl substances in selected Victorian rivers and estuaries: An historical snapshot.

Authors:  Mayumi Allinson; Nobuyoshi Yamashita; Sachi Taniyasu; Eriko Yamazaki; Graeme Allinson
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-09-16

5.  Liquid Chromatographic Tandem Mass Spectrometric (LC-MS/MS) Determination of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) and Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) in the Yolk of Poultry Eggs in Malaysia.

Authors:  Atiqah Tahziz; Didi Erwandi Mohamad Haron; Mohd Yusmaidie Aziz
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in edible fish species from Charleston Harbor and tributaries, South Carolina, United States: Exposure and risk assessment.

Authors:  Patricia A Fair; Beth Wolf; Natasha D White; Stephen A Arnott; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Rajendiran Karthikraj; John E Vena
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 6.498

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.