Literature DB >> 25010589

Project BOOST implementation: lessons learned.

Mark V Williams1, Jing Li1, Luke O Hansen1, Victoria Forth1, Tina Budnitz1, Jeffrey L Greenwald1, Eric Howell1, Lakshmi Halasyamani1, Arpana Vidyarthi1, Eric A Coleman1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Enhancing care coordination and reducing hospital readmissions have been a focus of multiple quality improvement (QI) initiatives. Project BOOST (Better Outcomes by Optimizing Safe Transitions) aims to enhance the discharge transition from hospital to home. Previous research indicates that QI initiatives originating externally often face difficulties gaining momentum or effecting lasting change in a hospital. We performed a qualitative evaluation of Project BOOST implementation by examining the successes and failures experienced by six pilot sites. We also evaluated the unique physician mentoring component of this program. Finally, we examined the impact of intensification of the physician mentoring model on adoption of BOOST interventions in two later Illinois cohorts (27 hospitals).
METHODS: Qualitative analysis of six pilot hospitals used a process of methodological triangulation and analysis of the BOOST enrollment applications, the listserv, and content from telephone interviews. Evaluation of BOOST implementation at Illinois hospitals occurred via mid-year and year-end surveys.
RESULTS: The identified common barriers included inadequate understanding of the current discharge process, insufficient administrative support, lack of protected time or dedicated resources, and lack of frontline staff buy-in. Facilitators of implementation included the mentor, a small beginning, teamwork, and proactive engagement of the patient. Notably, hospitals viewed their mentors as essential facilitators of change. Sites consistently commented that the individualized mentoring was extremely helpful and provided significant accountability and stimulated creativity. In the Illinois cohorts, the improved mentoring model showed more complete implementation of BOOST interventions.
CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of Project BOOST was well received by hospitals, although sites faced substantial barriers consistent with other QI research reports. The unique mentorship element of Project BOOST proved extremely valuable in helping sites overcome their distinctive challenges and identify facilitators for success. The findings from this qualitative study should contribute to future BOOST implementation success and others' efforts to optimize hospital discharge transitions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25010589     DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  South Med J        ISSN: 0038-4348            Impact factor:   0.954


  11 in total

1.  Operationalizing an Implementation Framework to Disseminate a Care Coordination Program for Rural Veterans.

Authors:  Chelsea Leonard; Heather Gilmartin; Marina McCreight; Lynette Kelley; Brandi Lippmann; Ashlea Mayberry; Andrew Coy; Emily Lawrence; Robert E Burke
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Effect of Intensive Interdisciplinary Transitional Care for High-Need, High-Cost Patients on Quality, Outcomes, and Costs: a Quasi-Experimental Study.

Authors:  James E Bailey; Satya Surbhi; Jim Y Wan; Kiraat D Munshi; Teresa M Waters; Bonnie L Binkley; Michael O Ugwueke; Ilana Graetz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Effect of health information technology (HIT)-based discharge transition interventions on patient readmissions and emergency room visits: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joanna Abraham; Alicia Meng; Sanjna Tripathy; Spyros Kitsiou; Thomas Kannampallil
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Implementation and adaptation of the Re-Engineered Discharge (RED) in five California hospitals: a qualitative research study.

Authors:  S E Mitchell; G M Weigel; V Laurens; J Martin; B W Jack
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 5.  A myriad of factors influencing the implementation of transitional care innovations: a scoping review.

Authors:  Amal Fakha; Lindsay Groenvynck; Bram de Boer; Theo van Achterberg; Jan Hamers; Hilde Verbeek
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 6.  Improving evidence-based grouping of transitional care strategies in hospital implementation using statistical tools and expert review.

Authors:  Jing Li; Gaixin Du; Jessica Miller Clouser; Arnold Stromberg; Glen Mays; Joann Sorra; Jane Brock; Terry Davis; Suzanne Mitchell; Huong Q Nguyen; Mark V Williams
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Fostering the implementation of transitional care innovations for older persons: prioritizing the influencing key factors using a modified Delphi technique.

Authors:  Amal Fakha; Bram de Boer; Theo van Achterberg; Jan Hamers; Hilde Verbeek
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.921

8.  Complexities of care: Common components of models of care in geriatrics.

Authors:  Matthew K McNabney; Ariel R Green; Meg Burke; Stephanie T Le; Dawn Butler; Audrey K Chun; David P Elliott; Ana Tuya Fulton; Kathryn Hyer; Belinda Setters; Joseph W Shega
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 7.538

9.  Care Transitions From Patient and Caregiver Perspectives.

Authors:  Suzanne E Mitchell; Vivian Laurens; Gabriela M Weigel; Karen B Hirschman; Allison M Scott; Huong Q Nguyen; Jessica Martin Howard; Lance Laird; Carol Levine; Terry C Davis; Brianna Gass; Elizabeth Shaid; Jing Li; Mark V Williams; Brian W Jack
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 10.  Planning Implementation Success of Syncope Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Emergency Department Using CFIR Framework.

Authors:  Jing Li; Susan S Smyth; Jessica M Clouser; Colleen A McMullen; Vedant Gupta; Mark V Williams
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.