Hiroki Watanabe1, Naoki Tanaka2, Tomonari Inuta2, Hideyuki Saitou2, Hisako Yanagi3. 1. Department of Medical Science and Welfare, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan; Department of Rehabilitation, Tsukuba Memorial Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan. 2. Department of Rehabilitation, Tsukuba Memorial Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan. 3. Department of Medical Science and Welfare, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan. Electronic address: hyanagi@md.tsukuba.ac.jp.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of gait training using a single-leg version of the Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) on the paretic side with conventional gait training in individuals with subacute stroke. DESIGN: Randomized open controlled pilot trial. SETTING: Hospitalized care. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of 44 patients who met the criteria; 12 patients refused. After randomization (N=32), 10 patients withdrew and a total of 22 poststroke participants (HAL group: n=11; conventional group: n=11) completed the randomized controlled trial. INTERVENTIONS: All participants received twelve 20-minute sessions in 4 weeks of either HAL (wearing the single-leg version of the HAL on their paretic side) or conventional (performed by skilled and experienced physical therapists) gait training. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures were evaluated prior to training and after 12 sessions. Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) was the primary outcome measure, whereas secondary outcome measures included maximum walking speed, timed Up and Go test, 6-minute walk distance, Short Physical Performance Battery, Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Lower Extremity, and isometric muscle strength (hip flexion and extension, knee flexion and extension). RESULTS: No participants withdrew because of adverse effects. Participants who received gait training with the HAL showed significantly more improvement in the FAC than those who received conventional gait training (95% confidence interval, .02-.88; P=.04). Secondary measures did not differ between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained in this randomized controlled trial suggest that a gait training program with the HAL could improve independent walking more efficiently than conventional gait training.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of gait training using a single-leg version of the Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) on the paretic side with conventional gait training in individuals with subacute stroke. DESIGN: Randomized open controlled pilot trial. SETTING: Hospitalized care. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of 44 patients who met the criteria; 12 patients refused. After randomization (N=32), 10 patients withdrew and a total of 22 poststroke participants (HAL group: n=11; conventional group: n=11) completed the randomized controlled trial. INTERVENTIONS: All participants received twelve 20-minute sessions in 4 weeks of either HAL (wearing the single-leg version of the HAL on their paretic side) or conventional (performed by skilled and experienced physical therapists) gait training. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures were evaluated prior to training and after 12 sessions. Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) was the primary outcome measure, whereas secondary outcome measures included maximum walking speed, timed Up and Go test, 6-minute walk distance, Short Physical Performance Battery, Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Lower Extremity, and isometric muscle strength (hip flexion and extension, knee flexion and extension). RESULTS: No participants withdrew because of adverse effects. Participants who received gait training with the HAL showed significantly more improvement in the FAC than those who received conventional gait training (95% confidence interval, .02-.88; P=.04). Secondary measures did not differ between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained in this randomized controlled trial suggest that a gait training program with the HAL could improve independent walking more efficiently than conventional gait training.
Authors: Jan Mehrholz; Simone Thomas; Cordula Werner; Joachim Kugler; Marcus Pohl; Bernhard Elsner Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-05-10
Authors: Susanne Palmcrantz; Anneli Wall; Katarina Skough Vreede; Påvel Lindberg; Anna Danielsson; Katharina S Sunnerhagen; Charlotte K Häger; Jörgen Borg Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2021-04-22 Impact factor: 4.677