| Literature DB >> 25010141 |
Denise L Gay1, Chao-Chun Yang2, Maksim V Plikus3, Mayumi Ito4, Charlotte Rivera1, Elsa Treffeisen1, Laura Doherty1, Michelle Spata1, Sarah E Millar5, George Cotsarelis6.
Abstract
Genetic studies suggest that the major events of human hair follicle development are similar to those in mice, but detailed analyses of this process are lacking. In mice, hair follicle placode "budding" is initiated by invagination of Wnt-induced epithelium into the underlying mesenchyme. Modification of adherens junctions (AJs) is clearly required for budding. Snail-mediated downregulation of AJ component E-cadherin is important for placode budding in mice. Beta-catenin, another AJ component, has been more difficult to study owing to its essential functions in Wnt signaling, a prerequisite for hair follicle placode induction. Here, we show that a subset of human invaginating hair placode cells expresses the stem cell marker CD133 during early morphogenesis. CD133 associates with membrane beta-catenin in early placodes, and its continued expression correlates with loss of beta-catenin and E-cadherin from the cell membrane at a time when E-cadherin transcriptional repressors Snail and Slug are not implicated. Stabilization of CD133 via anti-CD133 antibody treatment of human fetal scalp explants depresses beta-catenin and E-cadherin membrane localization. We discuss this unique correlation and suggest a hypothetical model whereby CD133 promotes morphogenesis in early hair follicle placodes through the localized removal of membrane beta-catenin proteins and subsequent AJ dissolution.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25010141 PMCID: PMC4465595 DOI: 10.1038/jid.2014.292
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Invest Dermatol ISSN: 0022-202X Impact factor: 8.551
Figure 1CD133 is an early marker of human hair follicle placodes
(a) Density dot plots of fetal scalp epidermal cells for expression of CD133 and alpha6-integrin (left) and alpha6-integrin+CD133+ cells for EpCAM and forward scatter (right). (b) Scalp whole mounts stained for EpCAM and CD133. Dotted line outlines CD133−EpCAM+ placode (left) or magnified CD133+EpCAM+ placode (right). (c) Frozen section of placode stained for EpCAM, CD133, overlap or schematic of CD133 localization. DAPI-stained nuclei are blue. Schematic placode cells are shaded light yellow (CD133- cells), dark yellow (CD133+ cells). The red dots represent CD133 location. (d) Single (left) and 3D stacked confocal images (middle and right) of placode stained for EpCAM and CD133. Cartoons denote orientation. Light purple nuclei in middle and right panels show DAPI-stained periderm. (e) Developing hair follicles analyzed for CD133 expression with schematic representations below. Scale bars are 25 μm. (a) – (e) N = 12 and N(t) = 6 (where N means the number of times these experiments were done and N(t) = number of individual tissue samples analyzed.
Figure 2CD133 expression correlates with Wnt activation and early hair morphogenesis but not proliferation
(a) Frozen sections of placodes co-stained for CD133 (red) and labeled markers (see panels). DAPI-stained nuclei are blue. Scale bar 25 μm. (b) Stacked confocal images of fetal scalp epidermis whole mounts stained for Snail or Slug and CD133. White dotted lines outline placodes. Scale bar 75 μm. (c) Triple staining of frozen sections for CD133, Lef1 and Ki-67. White arrows denote locations of Lef1:Ki-67 double-positive cells (right). Scale bar 25 μm. (a) – (c) N and N(t) = 3. (d) Bar graph comparing percent Ki-67+ cells within CD133− and CD133+ populations. Data are means ± SEM, ***P < 0.005. Example of compared regions (right). Arrows indicate Ki-67+ cells adjacent to CD133+ cells. Scale bar 25 μm. N = 22 placodes analyzed and N(t) = 3. (e) TEM analysis of 12 week placode. Rectangles show areas of magnification left to right. Scale bars; left, 2 μm; others, 500 nm. N and N(t) = 4.
Figure 3CD133+ cells express genes indicative of early hair follicle placode morphogenesis and EMT
(a) Representative dot plot of 13 week fetal scalp epidermal populations. Squares define regions of ITGA6+ and CD133+ sorted populations. (b) Venn diagram comparing overlap of gene expression in ITGA6+ and CD133+ populations. (c) Heatmap comparing differentially expressed genes in ITGA6+ and CD133+ populations from two independent array analyses. Green denotes upregulated and pink downregulated genes. N and N(t) = 2 arrays from 2 independent sorts. Results represent merged analyses (d) QPCR analyses comparing transcription levels of specific genes in sorted ITGA6+ (black bars) and CD133+ (gray bars) populations as described in Gay et al, 2013. N and N(t) = 3.
Microarray results of differentially regulated and unaffected genes in CD133+ cells compared with ITGA6+ cells.
| CD34, VAV3, SELE, CXCR4, DCLK1, FLT1, KDR, NRP1, NRP2, TGFB2, VCAN, BDNF, KIF5C, LIFR | |
| TGFB2, WNT5A, ETV5, VCAN, NRP2, ADAM23, CLD1, A2M, HAS2, GNG11, MSX2, SCUBE3, MYB, MCCT1, NRSA2, BDNF, NRP1, VAV3 FRZB, CDH11, PAPSS2, SLC27A2 | |
| PRDM1, WIF1, LIFR, DUSP6, NRP1, GNGL1, MICAL2, NRP2, COL14A1, MME, ETV5, KCNMA1, HAS2, MYB, LRRN1, KDELC1 | |
| SNAI1, SNAI2, ZEB1, TCF3, TCF4, KLF8, TWIST, SIX1, FOXC2, FOXF1, FOXD3, FOXQ1, FOXA1, FOXA2, GATA4, GATA6, HMGA2, ZNF703, PRX1 | |
| GRHL2, ELF3, ELF4 | |
| CHD1, CDH2, FN1, VIM | |
| FAT2, CDH19, LAMB4, GPNMB, LSAMP, NRXN1, POSTN, PLXNC1, DSG1, EPB4IL3, FMN1, GABRA2, GABRA4, GABRE, GRIA2, GRID2, GRIK1, LRRC7, PMP22, NLGN1 | |
| GABRA2, GABRA4, GABRE, GRIA2, GRID2, GRIK1, NMUR2, KCNJ5, RYR2, TRPC6 | |
| DCT, EDNRB, PAX3, KIT, TYR, TYRP1 | |
| ZEB2 |
Bioinformatics programs and references are defined in Materials and Methods.
References are provided in left column in parentheses.
Figure 4CD133 localizes to AJs in early placodes and to regions of beta-catenin and E-cadherin down-regulation in later placodes
(a) IF image of sub-placode cluster, dissociated from surrounding interfollicular epidermis, stained for CD133 and EpCAM. Scale bar 5 μm. (b) IF images of early (left) and later (right) placodes stained for CD133 and E-cadherin. Line (right panel) indicates E-cadherin-depleted region. Squares indicate magnified areas (lower panels). (c) – (e) IF of placode stained for CD133 and ZO1 (c), beta-catenin (d), HDAC6 (e). (f) In situ PLA of ‘CD133 + EpCAM’, ‘CD133 + E-cadherin’, ‘CD133 + beta-catenin ’ and ‘CD133 + HDAC6’ antibody combinations. Placodes in middle and right panels were counter-stained for beta-catenin or HDAC6 respectively and CD133. Scale bars 25 μm in (b) – (f). (g) Stacked confocal images of a placode co-stained for CD133, beta-catenin and E-cadherin. Rectangle defines magnified regions (lower panels). White arrowheads indicate regions of high CD133 and low beta-catenin and E-cadherin localization. Pink arrowhead indicates co-localized proteins. Scale bar 10 μm. (h) Scatter plot comparing relative fluorescence intensities of betacatenin and CD133 proteins along placode cell membranes. Left side shows relative fluorescence of membranes for beta-catenin (bCat): blue (high), red (intermediate) and yellow (low). Right side compares CD133 fluorescence within each group. See Fig S6 for details. N = 31 regions from 8 placodes. N(t) = 3. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.005, ****P < 0.001. (i) IFTEM of CD133 localization in placodes. Boxed regions show increased magnification left to right. Bottom panels provide additional examples. Arrowheads point to regions with high immunogold content. Scale bar middle left panel 10 μm, all other panels 500 nm. (a) – (i) N and N(t) ≥ 3.
Figure 5Perturbation of CD133 protein drives accelerated E-cadherin membrane loss in scalp explant placodes
(a) Schematic depicting scalp explant. (b) IF images of Day 0 (top) and 20 hour explant (bottom) stained for EpCAM. Scale bar 50 μm. (c) Confocal images comparing Day 0 scalp (stained with anti-CD133 and secondary antibodies, left panel) with anti-CD133 (middle) and control (right) explants stained with secondary antibodies only. (d) Bar graph showing relative CD133 protein concentration in Day 0 and anti-CD133 explant placodes and germs. N = 9 placodes for each group. (e) IF of Cntrl and anti-CD133 explants stained for E-cadherin. Scale bar 25 μm. (f) Bar graph showing quantitative comparison of E-cadherin in control and anti-CD133 explant placodes and germs. N = 18 placodes for each group. (g) Confocal image of adjacent placodes in anti-CD133 explant stained with secondary (CD133, red), EpCAM and E- cadherin antibodies. Scale bar 75 μm. (h) Confocal images of placodes from anti-CD133 and Cntrl explants stained for EpCAM (top) and E-cadherin (bottom). Insets in E-cad panels show true unenhanced intensities. (i) Confocal image from an anti-CD133 explant stained with secondary (red) and beta-catenin antibodies. Scale bars 10 μm (c, h, i). Data are means ± SEM, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. (a) – (i) N and N(t) ≥ 3.
Figure 6Hypothetical model for the role of CD133 in AJ loss during human hair follicle placode morphogenesis
(a) Schematic representation of an AJ connecting intercellular membranes. (b) Proposed model of AJ disruption following CD133 association with AJ beta-catenin protein. It should be noted that CD133 colocalization with AJ proteins prior to loss their loss in CD133-rich regions (Fig 4) indicates a time lag that may point to a more complex phenomenon than the simple model proposed here. EpCAM association with CD133 and possible transient association of HDAC6 with CD133 reflect results from PLA analyses in a. 4. Weak homophilic intercellular interaction between EpCAM proteins has been demonstrated by Litvinov et al, 1994. The question marks for EpCAM:EpCAM interaction (panel A) and CD133 sequestration of membrane beta-catenin (panel B) denote that these possibilities remain hypothetical.