Literature DB >> 25010092

The effect of increasing pedicle screw size on thoracic spinal canal dimensions: an anatomic study.

Samuel K Cho1, Branko Skovrlj, Young Lu, John M Caridi, Lawrence G Lenke.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Anatomic study.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the thoracic spinal canal diameter decreases when the pedicle is allowed to expand with increasing screw diameter. To observe whether osseous breach occurs medially or laterally. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Insertion of a pedicle screw that is larger in diameter than that of the native pedicle has been shown to expand the pedicle and increase biomechanical fixation strength. With this technique, there is concern for medial expansion of the pedicle causing decrease in spinal canal diameter, especially in the concavity of scoliosis, resulting in spinal cord compression. Also, large pedicle screws that are inserted correctly may still cause undetected medial bony breach during surgery.
METHODS: A total of 162 pedicles from 81 thoracic vertebrae (T1-T12) of 7 fresh-frozen adult cadavers were analyzed. After undertapping the pedicle by 1 mm, pedicle screws were inserted in increasing diameter (range, 4.0-9.5 mm) bilaterally until there was an osseous breach in the pedicle. A total of 938 screws were used. Transverse spinal canal diameter and pedicle circumference were measured (in millimeters) before and after each pedicle screw placement. Photographs and fluoroscopic images of representative specimens were obtained for visual assessment.
RESULTS: The average transverse spinal canal diameter was 17.7 mm. The average transverse canal diameter with the largest screw inserted before bony breach was detected was 17.6 mm (P = 0.92). The average diameter of the largest screw inserted before breach was 6.9 mm. Pedicle circumference increased from 41.8 mm before screw placement to 43.4 mm at maximal expansion before bony breach with the next sized screw. Twenty-eight pedicles did not break with 9.5-mm-diameter screws. There were 133 lateral and 1 medial breaches.
CONCLUSION: Increasing pedicle screw size caused pedicle expansion laterally but did not significantly alter transverse spinal canal dimensions. When there was an osseous breach, most were lateral (99.3%). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25010092     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

1.  A comparison of feasibility and safety of percutaneous fluoroscopic guided thoracic pedicle screws between Europeans and Asians: is there any difference?

Authors:  Mun Keong Kwan; Chee Kidd Chiu; Chris Yin Wei Chan; Reza Zamani; Nils Hansen-Algenstaedt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Accuracy of patient-specific template-guided vs. free-hand fluoroscopically controlled pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbar spine: a randomized cadaveric study.

Authors:  Mazda Farshad; Michael Betz; Nadja A Farshad-Amacker; Manuel Moser
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Currently Adopted Criteria for Pedicle Screw Diameter Selection.

Authors:  Giovanni F Solitro; Keith Whitlock; Farid Amirouche; Ankit I Mehta; Annie McDonnell
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-04-30

4.  Thoracic Pedicle Morphometry of Dry Vertebral Columns in Relation to Trans-Pedicular Fixation: A Cross-Sectional Study From Central India.

Authors:  Virendra Verma; John A Santoshi; Vaibhav Jain; Manmohan Patel; Manish Dwivedi; Manoj Nagar; Rajkumar Selvanayagam; Dharm Pal
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-05-16

5.  Micro-computed tomography analysis of the lumbar pedicle wall.

Authors:  Tomoyo Y Irie; Tohru Irie; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Kazuyuki Segami; Norimasa Iwasaki; Howard S An; Nozomu Inoue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.