Literature DB >> 25009613

A large sialolith on the parenchyma of the submandibular gland: A case report.

Jae-Hoon Jung1, Sung Ok Hong1, Kwantae Noh1, Deok-Won Lee1.   

Abstract

A 45-year-old female was referred to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery with the complaint of pain in the right submandibular region and a dry mouth, which had started one week previously. A clinical examination revealed a swelling and tenderness in the right submandibular region. Panoramic radiography and computed tomography identified a sialolith in the submandibular gland. Surgery on the sialolith was subsequently completed under general anesthesia extraorally. A brownish stone was present in the parenchyma of the submandibular gland, measuring 14×10 mm.

Entities:  

Keywords:  salivary stone; sialoadenectomy; sialolithiasis; submandibular gland

Year:  2014        PMID: 25009613      PMCID: PMC4079450          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2014.1730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


Introduction

Sialolithiasis is the most common disease of the major salivary glands and accounts for ~30% of all salivary disorders. Between 0.01 and 1.0% of the world population is believed to be affected by the disease (1), and the incidence is higher among males aged between 30 and 60 years. The most common location is the submandibular gland, the duct being more frequently affected than the parenchyma (2,3). Sialolithiasis is characterized by obstruction of the salivary secretion by a calculus. This is associated with pain and inflammation and in some occasions with an infection of the affected gland. In a few cases, when the sialolith is small and located near the orifice of the duct, it may be removed following a widening of the orifice with a lacrimal probe. Intraglandular sialoliths require submandibular sialadenectomy or partial parotidectomy. Clinical, radiographic findings are important in determination of the precise location and size in order to indicate the right treatment for the individual patient. A case is described here which is of interest because the large sized salivary stone is rarely located in the parenchyma of submandibular glands.

Case report

A 45-year-old female who had no significant medical history was referred to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Kyung Hee University Dental Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Korea) with the chief complaints of pain in the right submandibular region and a dry mouth, which had started one week previously. Clinical examination revealed a swelling and tenderness in the right submandibular region. Panoramic radiography showed a radiopaque mass in the submandibular area (Fig. 1). A few days later, computed tomography was performed, revealing the stone in the right submandibular gland (Fig. 2). We diagnosed this as sialolithiasis on the right submandibular gland.
Figure 1

Preoperative panoramic radiography illustrating a radiopaque lesion on the right submandibular area.

Figure 2

Preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography showing the salivary stone on the right submandibular gland.

Surgery to treat the sialolithiasis was subsequently completed extraorally under general anesthesia, due to its location. During surgery, sialoadenectomy was performed around the muscle and the branch of the facial nerve. The main specimen enucleated was an excised submandibular gland, measuring 32×25 mm. The brownish stone was present in the parenchyma of the submandibular gland, measuring 14×10 mm (Fig. 3).
Figure 3

Enucleated submandibular gland and salivary stone in the parenchyma of the submandibular gland.

The postoperative follow-up radiograph showed favorable removal of the salivary stone (Fig. 4). The symptoms and pain of the patient disappeared following surgery and complete healing of the surgical site was observed approximately three weeks subsequently. Informed consent was obtained from the patient and the pateint’s family.
Figure 4

Postoperative panorama showing elimination of the salivary stone on the right submandibular gland.

Discussion

Sialolithiasis is a frequently occurring disease of the salivary glands that is characterized by the obstruction of salivary secretion by a calculus. This is associated with pain and inflammation and, in certain cases, infection of the affected gland may also be present (4). Swelling is the most common symptom, followed by pain, fever and pus secretion (5). The size of salivary calculi varies from small particles, described as salivary sand, to large concrement formations. The average size of the salivary calculi lies between 3.3 and 17.9 mm (6). According to Lutsmann et al (7), sialoliths measuring <10 mm account for 78.8% of cases, while those measuring 10–15 and >15 mm account for 13.6 and 7.65% of cases, respectively. In the present study, the sialolith measured 14×10 mm in size. Salivary calculi are usually located in the ducts of glands and in the hilus, whereas sialoliths on the parenchyma occur in 9–17% of all cases, as stated in previous studies (1,7,8). The treatment of choice for sialolithiasis is the removal of the obstructing stone by an intraoral approach. In certain instances this method may also be applied for sialoliths located in the hilus of the submandibular gland. In a few cases, when the sialolith is small and located near the orifice of the duct, the sialolith may be removed following a widening of the orifice with a lacrimal probe. Intraglandular sialoliths require submandibular sialoadenectomy or partial parotidectomy (7,9). In the present case, submandibular sialoadenectomy was performed, as the sialolith was large and located in the parenchyma of the gland. The patient in the present case presented with typical symptoms, and the findings of clinical and radiographic examination were also typical. The diagnosis was made by clinical and radiographic examination, and sialoadenectomy was selected as the treatment method due to the location of the stone. The presented case illustrates the requirement for proper diagnosis and treatment of choice in cases of salivary gland disease. Postoperative follow-up is essential to ensure the patient is symptom- and stone-free in the long-term. In conclusion, clinical and radiographic findings are important in determining the precise location and size of the sialolith in order to indicate the right treatment for the individual patient.
  9 in total

1.  Sialolithiasis of submandibular gland.

Authors:  Todd Austin; Jeffrey Davis; Ted Chan
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.484

2.  Salivary gland calculi. Pain, swelling associated with eating.

Authors:  D M LEVY; W H REMINE; K D DEVINE
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1962-09-29       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Sialolithiasis. A survey on 245 patients and a review of the literature.

Authors:  J Lustmann; E Regev; Y Melamed
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.789

4.  Morphology of salivary calculi. The distribution of the inorganic component.

Authors:  G Anneroth; C M Eneroth; G Isacsson
Journal:  J Oral Pathol       Date:  1975-11

5.  Current opinions in sialolithiasis diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  M Andretta; A Tregnaghi; V Prosenikliev; A Staffieri
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.124

6.  Salivary gland function after sialolithiasis: scintigraphic examination of submandibular glands with 99mTc-pertechnetate.

Authors:  Y Yoshimura; T Morishita; T Sugihara
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Sialendoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of sialolithiasis: a study on more than 1000 patients.

Authors:  Johannes Zenk; Michael Koch; Nils Klintworth; Barbara König; Katharina Konz; M Boyd Gillespie; Heinrich Iro
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  Sialolithiasis: mechanism of calculi formation and etiologic factors.

Authors:  Felix Grases; Cristina Santiago; Bartolomé M Simonet; Antonia Costa-Bauzá
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.786

9.  [Clinical study of sialolithiasis. Findings from 100 cases].

Authors:  D Antoniadis; L Mendonidou; P Papanayotou; G Trigonidis
Journal:  Hell Stomatol Chron       Date:  1989 Oct-Dec
  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  3D Reconstruction and Prediction of Sialolith Surgery.

Authors:  Jamyson Oliveira Santos; Brunna da Silva Firmino; Matheus Santos Carvalho; Jean de Pinho Mendes; Lucas Novaes Teixeira; Sérgio Lúcio Pereira de Castro Lopes; André Luiz Ferreira Costa; Antonione Santos Bezerra Pinto
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2018-11-13

2.  Untreated submandibular megalith for over 60 years.

Authors:  Khalid A Ahmed; Alia K Alfadhel; Bayan J Mohammed
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.484

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.