| Literature DB >> 25009478 |
Robbin L Gibb1, Claudia L R Gonzalez1, Bryan Kolb1.
Abstract
Birth is a particularly vulnerable time for acquiring brain injury. Unfortunately, very few treatments are available for those affected. Here we explore the effectiveness of prenatal intervention in an animal model of early brain damage. We used a complex housing paradigm as a form of prenatal enrichment. Six nulliparous dams and one male rat were placed in complex housing (condomom group) for 12 h per day until the dams' delivered their pups. At parturition the dams were left in their home (standard) cages with their pups. Four dams were housed in standard cages (cagemom group) throughout pregnancy and with their pups until weaning. At postnatal day 3 (P3) infants of both groups received frontal cortex removals or sham surgery. Behavioral testing began on P60 and included the Morris water task and a skilled reaching task. Brains were processed for Golgi analyses. Complex housing of the mother had a significant effect on the behavior of their pups. Control animals from the condomom group outperformed those of the cagemom group in the water task. Condomom animals with lesions performed better than their cagemom cohorts in both the water task and in skilled reaching. Condomom animals showed an increase in cortical thickness at anterior planes and thalamic area at both anterior and posterior regions. Golgi analyses revealed an increase in spine density. These results suggest that prenatal enrichment alters brain organization in manner that is prophylactic for perinatal brain injury. This result could have significant implications for the prenatal management of infants expected to be at risk for difficult birth.Entities:
Keywords: Golgi; complex housing; cortical injury; plasticity; prenatal; recovery
Year: 2014 PMID: 25009478 PMCID: PMC4067998 DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00223
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Behav Neurosci ISSN: 1662-5153 Impact factor: 3.558
Figure 1Complex housing for rats (Condominiums). The hardware cloth construction and a series of runways and swings allowed exploration of the condominiums in all dimensions. PVC pipes provided dark shelter for inhabitants. A variety of hard plastic toys were placed on the condo floor and were changes weekly to provide additional stimulation.
Figure 2(A) Acquisition of learning the location of a hidden platform in the Morris Water. Task over 5 days of testing. Condomom animals with early lesions acquired the task faster than did cagemom animals with similar injury and did not differ from the performance of the cagemom controls. Latency is reported in seconds. (D, Days; C, Control; L, P3 Lesion). (B) Latency in seconds to find a hidden platform averaged and summed over 5 days of testing. Control animals found the platform faster than did animals with early lesions. Condomom animals with P3 lesions were significantly faster at finding the hidden platform than were P3 lesion animals without treatment. (C) Total distance swam (in arbitrary computer units) searching for a hidden platform in the Morris water task. Control animals swam shorter distances to find the platform and condomom lesion animals did not differ in swim distance from cagemom controls but swam shorter distances than their untreated counterparts.
Figure 3Reaching success defined as the number of successful reaches divided by the total number of reaches (expressed as a percentage). Early frontal lesion disrupted reaching accuracy but condomom animals showed substantial recovery (or sparing) of reaching performance.
Summary of body weights.
| Con. males | 414.2 ± 21.1 | 365.3 ± 8.7 |
| P3 males | 332.4 ± 33.5 | 357.8 ± 22.4 |
| Con. females | 281.4 ± 8.6 | 274.6 ± 18.0 |
| P3 females | 287.0 ± 4.6 | 247.4 ± 11.4 |
Numbers refer to means ± standard errors in grams.
Summary of brain weight.
| Con. males | 2.009 ± 0.027 | 1.958 ± 0.007 |
| P3 males | 1.752 ± 0.034 | 1.743 ± 0.054 |
| Con. females | 1.909 ± 0.025 | 1.900 ± 0.064 |
| P3 females | 1.716 ± 0.017 | 1.652 ± 0.053 |
Numbers refer to means ± standard errors in grams.
Summary of cortical thickness at anterior and posterior planes.
| 1–2 | Con | 42.2 ± 0.5 | 41.3 ± 0.4 |
| P3 | 38.0 ± 0.6 | 34.2 ± 0.5 | |
| 3–5 | Con | 34.1 ± 0.3 | 34.1 ± 0.4 |
| P3 | 31.5 ± 0.2 | 31.4 ± 0.4 | |
Numbers refer means ± standard errors in mm.
Differs significantly from no treatment values in same lesion group (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Schematic illustration of lesion size in two representative brain injured animals. (A) Represents cagemom animal. (B) Represents condomom animal.
Summary of thalamic area in the anterior plane.
| Control | 108.9 | 100.0 |
| P3 lesion | 107.1 | 87.6 |
Numbers refer to percent of no treatment control values.
Differs significantly from no treatment control values (p < 0.05).
Summary of thalamic area in the posterior plane.
| Control | 116.2 | 100.0 |
| P3 lesion | 112.8 | 92.4 |
Numbers refer to percent of no treatment control values.
Differs significantly from no treatment control values (p < 0.05).
Summary of spine density on the apical terminal.
| Control | 6.32 ± 0.24 | 5.95 ± 0.20 |
| P3 lesion | 7.02 ± 0.17 | 6.20 ± 0.30 |
Numbers refer to number of spines/10 μm dendritic branch length.
Differs significantly from no treatment control values (p < 0.05).
Summary of spine density on the basilar terminal.
| Control-male | 7.31 ± 0.24 | 5.77 ± 0.19 |
| Control-female | 7.58 ± 0.21 | 6.62 ± 0.12 |
| P3 lesion-male | 7.29 ± 0.41 | 5.94 ± 0.16 |
| P3 lesion-female | 7.69 ± 0.45 | 6.50 ± 0.49 |
Numbers refer to number of spines/10 μm dendritic branch length.
Differs significantly from no treatment control values of the same sex (p < 0.05).