Literature DB >> 25009359

A neurocomputational account of the face configural effect.

Xiaokun Xu1, Irving Biederman2, Manan P Shah3.   

Abstract

A striking phenomenon in face perception is the configural effect in which a difference in a single part appears more distinct in the context of a face than it does by itself. The face context would be expected to increase search complexity, rendering discrimination more--not less--difficult. Remarkably, there has never been a biologically plausible explanation of this fundamental signature of face recognition.We show that the configural effect can be simply derived from a model composed of overlapping receptive fields (RFs) characteristic of early cortical simple-cell tuning but also present in face-selective areas. Because of the overlap in RFs, the difference in a single part is not only represented in the RFs centered on it but also propagated to larger RFs centered on distant parts of the face. Dissimilarity values computed from the model between pairs of faces and pairs of face parts closely matched the recognition accuracy of human observers who had learned a set of faces composed of composite parts and were tested on wholes (Which is Larry?) and parts (Which is Larry’s nose?). When stimuli were high versus low passed the contributions of different spatial frequency (SF) bands to the configural effect were largely comparable. Therefore, it was the larger RFs rather than the low SFs that accounted for most of the configural effect. The representation explains why, relative to objects, face recognition is so adversely affected by inversion and contrast reversal and why distinctions between similar faces are ineffable.
© 2014 ARVO.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gabor jet; face configural effect; high- versus low-pass filtering of faces; holistic processing

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25009359     DOI: 10.1167/14.8.9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  3 in total

Review 1.  The composite face illusion.

Authors:  Jennifer Murphy; Katie L H Gray; Richard Cook
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

2.  Neural Tuning Size in a Model of Primate Visual Processing Accounts for Three Key Markers of Holistic Face Processing.

Authors:  Cheston Tan; Tomaso Poggio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  On the particular vulnerability of face recognition to aging: a review of three hypotheses.

Authors:  Isabelle Boutet; Vanessa Taler; Charles A Collin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.