BACKGROUND: (68)Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT is a well-established method for detecting and targeting the volume definition of meningiomas prior to radiotherapy. Moreover, there is evidence that this method is able to detect meningiomas with higher sensitivity than the goldstandard MRI. Since the hybrid PET/MRI scanner became available in the past few years, the next stage of development could consequently evolve by evaluating the feasibility of a hybrid PET/MRI scanner using (68)Ga-DOTATOC for detecting meningiomas. METHODS: Fifteen patients received (68)Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT (0.5 h post injection [p.i.]) followed by PET/MRI 2 hours p.i. Both investigations were analyzed separately and then compared with respect to image quality, detection of intracranial meningiomas, and radiotracer uptake values (RUVs). In addition, ratios between radiotracer uptake in meningiomas and pituitary glands were compared between both PET/CT and PET/MRI. RESULTS: Overall, 33 intracranial meningiomas were detected. All were visible with high contrast in both PET/CT and PET/MRI. (68)Ga-DOTATOC-PET/MRI provided flawless image quality without artefacts. Calculated RUV in meningiomas, as well as the ratios of RUVs in meningiomas to those of pituitary glands, were higher in PET/CT. As a result, meningiomas can be distinguished from pituitary glands better in early images. CONCLUSIONS: (68)Ga-DOTATOC-PET/MRI provided flawless image quality and presented an ideal combination of high sensitivity/specificity (PET) and the best possible morphological visualization of meningiomas (MRI). In addition, excellent detection of meningiomas is already possible at 0.5 hours p.i. Later images do not improve the distinction between pituitary gland and adjacent meningiomas. However, RUVs need to be carefully compared between both imaging modalities.
BACKGROUND: (68)Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT is a well-established method for detecting and targeting the volume definition of meningiomas prior to radiotherapy. Moreover, there is evidence that this method is able to detect meningiomas with higher sensitivity than the goldstandard MRI. Since the hybrid PET/MRI scanner became available in the past few years, the next stage of development could consequently evolve by evaluating the feasibility of a hybrid PET/MRI scanner using (68)Ga-DOTATOC for detecting meningiomas. METHODS: Fifteen patients received (68)Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT (0.5 h post injection [p.i.]) followed by PET/MRI 2 hours p.i. Both investigations were analyzed separately and then compared with respect to image quality, detection of intracranial meningiomas, and radiotracer uptake values (RUVs). In addition, ratios between radiotracer uptake in meningiomas and pituitary glands were compared between both PET/CT and PET/MRI. RESULTS: Overall, 33 intracranial meningiomas were detected. All were visible with high contrast in both PET/CT and PET/MRI. (68)Ga-DOTATOC-PET/MRI provided flawless image quality without artefacts. Calculated RUV in meningiomas, as well as the ratios of RUVs in meningiomas to those of pituitary glands, were higher in PET/CT. As a result, meningiomas can be distinguished from pituitary glands better in early images. CONCLUSIONS: (68)Ga-DOTATOC-PET/MRI provided flawless image quality and presented an ideal combination of high sensitivity/specificity (PET) and the best possible morphological visualization of meningiomas (MRI). In addition, excellent detection of meningiomas is already possible at 0.5 hours p.i. Later images do not improve the distinction between pituitary gland and adjacent meningiomas. However, RUVs need to be carefully compared between both imaging modalities.
Authors: Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Frederik L Giesel; Heinz G Linhart; Uwe Haberkorn; Sabine Haufe; Stephanie E Combs; Dino Podlesek; Michael Eisenhut; Clemens Kratochwil Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-06-05 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: A Afshar-Oromieh; U Haberkorn; H P Schlemmer; M Fenchel; M Eder; M Eisenhut; B A Hadaschik; A Kopp-Schneider; M Röthke Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2013-12-19 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Nina F Schwenzer; Christina Schraml; Mark Müller; Cornelia Brendle; Alexander Sauter; Werner Spengler; Anna C Pfannenberg; Claus D Claussen; Holger Schmidt Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-05-31 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Robert C Rostomily; Maria Elias; Mei Deng; Paul Elias; Donald E Born; David Muballe; Daniel L Silbergeld; Neal Futran; Ernest A Weymuller; David A Mankoff; Janet Eary Journal: Head Neck Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: I Buchmann; M Henze; S Engelbrecht; M Eisenhut; A Runz; M Schäfer; T Schilling; S Haufe; T Herrmann; U Haberkorn Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2007-05-23 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Barbara Gehler; Frank Paulsen; Mehmet O Oksüz; Till-Karsten Hauser; Susanne M Eschmann; Roland Bares; Christina Pfannenberg; Michael Bamberg; Peter Bartenstein; Claus Belka; Ute Ganswindt Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2009-11-18 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Kerstin A Kessel; Hanna Fischer; Markus Oechnser; Claus Zimmer; Bernhard Meyer; Stephanie E Combs Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Michael Sommerauer; Jan-Karl Burkhardt; Karl Frontzek; Elisabeth Rushing; Alfred Buck; Niklaus Krayenbuehl; Michael Weller; Niklaus Schaefer; Felix P Kuhn Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2016-02-09 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Robin A Buerki; Craig M Horbinski; Timothy Kruser; Peleg M Horowitz; Charles David James; Rimas V Lukas Journal: Future Oncol Date: 2018-08-07 Impact factor: 3.404
Authors: Kerstin A Kessel; Wolfgang Weber; Igor Yakushev; Hanna Fischer; Theresa Voglhuber; Christian Diehl; Christoph Straube; Claus Zimmer; Benedikt Wiestler; Jens Gempt; Bernhard Meyer; Stephanie E Combs Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-11-22 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Martin T Freitag; Jan P Radtke; Boris A Hadaschik; A Kopp-Schneider; Matthias Eder; Klaus Kopka; Uwe Haberkorn; Matthias Roethke; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Ali Afshar-Oromieh Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-10-28 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Frank A E Kruyt; Rob J M Groen; Bianca M Dijkstra; Marion de Jong; Marcus C M Stroet; Fritz Andreae; Sebastiaan E Dulfer; Marieke Everts; Schelto Kruijff; Julie Nonnekens; Wilfred F A den Dunnen Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2021-03-26 Impact factor: 4.130