Literature DB >> 25008004

Recurring patterns in stationary intervals of abdominal uterine electromyograms during gestation.

Luigi Yuri Di Marco1, Costanzo Di Maria, Wing-Chiu Tong, Michael J Taggart, Stephen C Robson, Philip Langley.   

Abstract

Abdominal uterine electromyograms (uEMG) studies have focused on uterine contractions to describe the evolution of uterine activity and preterm birth (PTB) prediction. Stationary, non-contracting uEMG has not been studied. The aim of the study was to investigate the recurring patterns in stationary uEMG, their relationship with gestation age and PTB, and PTB predictivity. A public database of 300 (38 PTB) three-channel (S1-S3) uEMG recordings of 30 min, collected between 22 and 35 weeks' gestation, was used. Motion and labour contraction-free intervals in uEMG were identified as 5-min weak-sense stationarity intervals in 268 (34 PTB) recordings. Sample entropy (SampEn), percentage recurrence (PR), percentage determinism (PD), entropy (ER), and maximum length (L MAX) of recurrence were calculated and analysed according to the time to delivery and PTB. Random time series were generated by random shuffle (RS) of actual data. Recurrence was present in actual data (p<0.001) but not RS. In S3, PR (p<0.005), PD (p<0.01), ER (p<0.005), and L MAX (p<0.05) were higher, and SampEn lower (p<0.005) in PTB. Recurrence indices increased (all p<0.001) and SampEn decreased (p<0.01) with decreasing time to delivery, suggesting increasingly regular and recurring patterns with gestation progression. All indices predicted PTB with AUC≥0.62 (p<0.05). Recurring patterns in stationary non-contracting uEMG were associated with time to delivery but were relatively poor predictors of PTB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25008004     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-014-1174-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  22 in total

1.  PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals.

Authors:  A L Goldberger; L A Amaral; L Glass; J M Hausdorff; P C Ivanov; R G Mark; J E Mietus; G B Moody; C K Peng; H E Stanley
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-06-13       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Non-stationarities significantly distort short-term spectral, symbolic and entropy heart rate variability indices.

Authors:  Valentina Magagnin; Tito Bassani; Vlasta Bari; Maurizio Turiel; Roberto Maestri; Gian Domenico Pinna; Alberto Porta
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 2.833

3.  Noninvasive estimation of the electrohysterographic action-potential conduction velocity.

Authors:  Chiara Rabotti; Massimo Mischi; S Guid Oei; Jan W M Bergmans
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  A comparison of various linear and non-linear signal processing techniques to separate uterine EMG records of term and pre-term delivery groups.

Authors:  G Fele-Zorz; G Kavsek; Z Novak-Antolic; F Jager
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Uterine EHG processing for obstetrical monitoring.

Authors:  C Marque; J M Duchene; S Leclercq; G S Panczer; J Chaumont
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Prediction of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using recurrence plot-based features of the RR-interval signal.

Authors:  Maryam Mohebbi; Hassan Ghassemian
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 2.833

Review 7.  Uterine electromyography: a critical review.

Authors:  D Devedeux; C Marque; S Mansour; G Germain; J Duchêne
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Comparing uterine electromyography activity of antepartum patients versus term labor patients.

Authors:  Robert E Garfield; William L Maner; Lyn B MacKay; Dietmar Schlembach; George R Saade
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 9.  Control and assessment of the uterus and cervix during pregnancy and labour.

Authors:  R E Garfield; G Saade; C Buhimschi; I Buhimschi; L Shi; S Q Shi; K Chwalisz
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 15.610

10.  Recurrence quantification of fractal structures.

Authors:  Charles L Webber
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 4.566

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluation of an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) modeling strategy in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Hua Cao; Laurent Peyrodie; Olivier Agnani; Fabrice Cavillon; Patrick Hautecoeur; Cécile Donzé
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 2.602

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.