Literature DB >> 25007878

FEES protocol derived estimates of sensitivity: aspiration in dysphagic patients.

Laura W J Baijens1, Renée Speyer, Walmari Pilz, Nel Roodenburg.   

Abstract

Aspiration is a common phenomenon in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. It can be studied using fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). FEES is well known and widely used in the diagnosis and treatment of swallowing disorders. However, various protocols exist, and there is no consensus on the examination protocol. The objective of this prospective study was to determine the FEES protocol derived estimates of sensitivity (Se') to detection of aspiration in dysphagic patients. The study estimated the probability of aspiration as a function of the number of swallow trials in dysphagic patients using FEES. The derived sensitivity was calculated based on presence or absence of aspiration in a ten-swallow trial protocol as arbitrary 'gold standard'. Eighty-four persons were included, comprising two patient populations with oropharyngeal dysphagia. Dysphagia in one group was due to head and neck cancer and possible oncological treatment effects on swallowing; in the other it was a result of neurological disease. All patients underwent a standardized FEES examination using ten swallows of thin liquid followed by ten swallows of thick liquid, all in boluses of 10 cc each. FEES recordings were rated for aspiration by an expert panel blinded to patients' identity and clinical history. Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis techniques, and Log Rank/Mantel-Cox tests were used. In both patient populations the aspiration risk was underestimated when using a limited number (three or four) of swallow trials. The oncology and neurology patients differed significantly in the number of swallow trials required to determine aspiration for thin liquids (median values 2 and 7 respectively, P = 0.006). FEES protocols using a limited number of swallow trials can underestimate the aspiration risk in both oncological and neurological patients suffering from oropharyngeal dysphagia, especially when using boluses with a thin liquid consistency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25007878     DOI: 10.1007/s00455-014-9549-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dysphagia        ISSN: 0179-051X            Impact factor:   3.438


  14 in total

1.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

Review 2.  Bedside screening tests vs. videofluoroscopy or fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing to detect dysphagia in patients with neurological disorders: systematic review.

Authors:  Gerrie J J W Bours; Renée Speyer; Jessie Lemmens; Martien Limburg; Rianne de Wit
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.187

3.  A penetration-aspiration scale.

Authors:  J C Rosenbek; J A Robbins; E B Roecker; J L Coyle; J L Wood
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Initial psychometric assessment of a functional oral intake scale for dysphagia in stroke patients.

Authors:  Michael A Crary; Giselle D Carnaby Mann; Michael E Groher
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 5.  Dysphagia after stroke: incidence, diagnosis, and pulmonary complications.

Authors:  Rosemary Martino; Norine Foley; Sanjit Bhogal; Nicholas Diamant; Mark Speechley; Robert Teasell
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Aspiration risk after acute stroke: comparison of clinical examination and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing.

Authors:  Steven B Leder; Julian F Espinosa
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 7.  Aspiration pneumonia and dysphagia in the elderly.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Danielle Kaplan
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 8.  Evaluation of oropharyngeal dysphagia: which diagnostic tool is superior?

Authors:  Susan E Langmore
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.064

9.  Assessing penetration and aspiration: how do videofluoroscopy and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing compare?

Authors:  Annette M Kelly; Michael J Drinnan; Paula Leslie
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 10.  Effects of therapy in oropharyngeal dysphagia by speech and language therapists: a systematic review.

Authors:  Renée Speyer; Laura Baijens; Mariëlle Heijnen; Iris Zwijnenberg
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 3.438

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  History of Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Evaluation and Management of Pharyngeal Dysphagia: Changes over the Years.

Authors:  Susan E Langmore
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 2.  [Developments in dysphagia diagnostics : Presentation of an interdisciplinary concept].

Authors:  C Pflug; T Flügel; J C Nienstedt
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  Evaluating the safety of oral methylene blue during swallowing assessment: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bina Tariq; Sorina R Simon; Walmari Pilz; Andra Maxim; Bernd Kremer; Laura W J Baijens
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  European white paper: oropharyngeal dysphagia in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Laura W J Baijens; Margaret Walshe; Leena-Maija Aaltonen; Christoph Arens; Reinie Cordier; Patrick Cras; Lise Crevier-Buchman; Chris Curtis; Wojciech Golusinski; Roganie Govender; Jesper Grau Eriksen; Kevin Hansen; Kate Heathcote; Markus M Hess; Sefik Hosal; Jens Peter Klussmann; C René Leemans; Denise MacCarthy; Beatrice Manduchi; Jean-Paul Marie; Reza Nouraei; Claire Parkes; Christina Pflug; Walmari Pilz; Julie Regan; Nathalie Rommel; Antonio Schindler; Annemie M W J Schols; Renee Speyer; Giovanni Succo; Irene Wessel; Anna C H Willemsen; Taner Yilmaz; Pere Clavé
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  Oropharyngeal dysphagia: manifestations and diagnosis.

Authors:  Nathalie Rommel; Shaheen Hamdy
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 6.  Feeding Difficulties in Children with Esophageal Atresia.

Authors:  Lisa Mahoney; Rachel Rosen
Journal:  Paediatr Respir Rev       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 2.726

7.  Relationship Between Laryngeal Sensory Deficits, Aspiration, and Pneumonia in Patients with Dysphagia.

Authors:  Asako Kaneoka; Jessica M Pisegna; Haruhi Inokuchi; Rumi Ueha; Takao Goto; Takaharu Nito; Cara E Stepp; Michael P LaValley; Nobuhiko Haga; Susan E Langmore
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 3.438

8.  Identifying Patterns of FEES-Derived Swallowing Trajectories Using Group-Based Trajectory Model.

Authors:  Laura W J Baijens; Walmari Pilz; Bernd Kremer; Valeria Lima Passos
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 9.  Feeding Problems and Their Underlying Mechanisms in the Esophageal Atresia-Tracheoesophageal Fistula Patient.

Authors:  Lisa Mahoney; Rachel Rosen
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.418

10.  The endoscopic evaluation of the oral phase of swallowing (Oral-FEES, O-FEES): a pilot study of the clinical use of a new procedure.

Authors:  D Farneti; B Fattori; L Bastiani
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.