Literature DB >> 25007836

Efficacy of contrast medium induced Pd/Pa ratio in predicting functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenosis assessed by fractional flow reserve: insights from the RINASCI study.

Antonio Maria Leone1, Giancarla Scalone, Giovanni Luigi De Maria, Francesco Tagliaferro, Andrea Gardi, Fabio Clemente, Eloisa Basile, Pio Cialdella, Alberto Ranieri De Caterina, Italo Porto, Cristina Aurigemma, Francesco Burzotta, Giampaolo Niccoli, Carlo Trani, Antonio Giuseppe Rebuzzi, Filippo Crea.   

Abstract

AIMS: The need of adenosine administration for the achievement of maximal hyperaemia limits the widespread application of fractional flow reserve (FFR) in the real world. We hypothesised that Pd/Pa ratio registered during submaximal reactive hyperaemia induced by conventional non-ionic radiographic contrast medium (contrast medium induced Pd/Pa ratio: CMR) can be sufficient for the assessment of physiological severity of stenosis in the vast majority of cases. The aim of the present study was to test the accuracy of CMR in comparison to FFR. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Eighty patients with 104 intermediate coronary stenoses were prospectively and consecutively enrolled. CMR was obtained after intracoronary injection of 6 ml of radiographic contrast medium, while FFR was measured after administration of adenosine. Despite the fact that CMR values were significantly higher than FFR values (0.88 [IR 0.80-0.92] vs. 0.87 [IR 0.83-0.94], p<0.001), a strong correlation between CMR and FFR values was observed (r=0.94, p<0.001) with a close agreement at Bland-Altman analysis (95% CI of disagreement: -0.029 to 0.072). ROC curve analysis showed an excellent accuracy of CMR cut-off of ≤0.83 in predicting FFR value ≤0.80 (AUC 0.97 [95% CI: 0.91-0.99, specificity 96.1, sensitivity 85.7]). Moreover, no FFR value ≤0.80 corresponded to a CMR ≥0.88.
CONCLUSIONS: CMR is accurate in predicting the functional significance of coronary stenosis. This could allow limiting the use of adenosine to obtain FFR to doubtful cases. In particular, we suggest considering a CMR value ≤0.83 to be significant, a CMR value ≥0.88 as not significant, and inducing maximal hyperaemia using adenosine for FFR assessment when CMR is between 0.84 and 0.87.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25007836     DOI: 10.4244/EIJY14M07_02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  15 in total

Review 1.  Physiologic Assessment of Coronary Stenosis: Current Status and Future Directions.

Authors:  Sercan Okutucu; Mehmet Cilingiroglu; Marc D Feldman
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  A simplified formula to calculate fractional flow reserve in sequential lesions circumventing the measurement of coronary wedge pressure: The APIS-S pilot study.

Authors:  Juan Luis Gutiérrez-Chico; Carlos Cortés; Miłosz Jaguszewski; Michele Schincariol; Ignacio J Amat-Santos; Juan A Franco-Peláez; Grzegorz Żuk; Dariusz Ciećwierz; Wojciech Wojakowski; Felipe Navarro; Shengxian Tu; Borja Ibáñez
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.737

Review 3.  Invasive assessment of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Stylianos A Pyxaras; William Wijns; Johan H C Reiber; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Physiological Assessment of Coronary Lesions in 2020.

Authors:  Mohsin Chowdhury; Eric A Osborn
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2020-01-15

Review 5.  Coronary Physiology Assessment for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease.

Authors:  Ali E Denktas; David Paniagua; Hani Jneid
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.113

6.  Simplifying the assessment of coronary artery stenosis by enhancing instantaneous wave free ratio.

Authors:  Vincent Spagnoli; Fabien Picard; Victor-Xavier Tadros; Daniel Cournoyer; Serge Doucet; Jean François Tanguay; Gilbert Gosselin; Pierre de Guise; Richard Gallo
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-04

Review 7.  The Role of Coronary Physiology in Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Authors:  Federico Marin; Roberto Scarsini; Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios; Rafail A Kotronias; Flavio Ribichini; Adrian P Banning; Giovanni Luigi De Maria
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2022

Review 8.  Fractional flow reserve-guided management in stable coronary disease and acute myocardial infarction: recent developments.

Authors:  Colin Berry; David Corcoran; Barry Hennigan; Stuart Watkins; Jamie Layland; Keith G Oldroyd
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Efficacy of coronary fractional flow reserve using contrast medium compared to adenosine.

Authors:  Selim Topcu; Ibrahim Halil Tanboğa; Enbiya Aksakal; Uğur Aksu; Oktay Gulcu; Oğuzhan Birdal; Arif Arısoy; Arzu Kalaycı; Fatih Rifat Ulusoy; Serdar Sevimli
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 1.426

10.  The ongoing search for simplifying fractional flow reserve assessment: the role of contrast medium.

Authors:  Pio Cialdella; Domenico D'Amario; Antonio Maria Leone
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 1.426

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.