Literature DB >> 25007129

What factors are associated with the provision of assistive technologies: the Bogotá D.C. case.

Adriana Rios1, Antonio Miguel Cruz, Mayra R Guarín, Pedro Sebastián Caycedo Villarraga.   

Abstract

AIM: To examine what demographics and clinical factors are associated with the provision of assistive technology (AT) devices in a low-income country.
METHOD: Retrospective cross-sectional exploratory study design including 15 of the 20 localities across Bogotá D.C., Colombia, a city with 6,776,009 inhabitants.
RESULTS: The type of AT device provided was significantly dependent (p < 0.001) on the client's diagnosis, impairment, age, and socio-economic strata, whether the client has a care giver, the geographical zone in which the client lives, the year of the AT provision, and the total number of AT delivered. In contrast, the client's gender (p > 0.05) and the client's affiliated type of healthcare service had no effect. In addition to that, the client's age, the client's socio-economic strata, the number of AT devices provided to the client, and the diagnostic type were the factors with the strongest level of association with the type of AT device provided.
CONCLUSIONS: Our research showed that the provision of AT in Bogotá D.C. prioritizes both people who are at the highest levels of vulnerability, and as many people as possible with the budget. That is, the low socio-economic strata, younger and older people, and the provision of at least one AT device. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: Provision of AT is intended for equal opportunities for the social participation of people with a disability. Also, people with disabilities have the right to access AT regardless of the type of limitation, gender, race, age or region where they live. Research regarding AT in developing countries is scarce; thus, there is a need to conduct studies in such contexts. This study provides scientific evidence to support the development of models, approaches and strategies of AT provision in low-income countries where resources for rehabilitation are scarce.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assistive device; HAAT; assistive technology; assistive technology device classification; assistive technology service; disability and health; low-income countries

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25007129     DOI: 10.3109/17483107.2014.936053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol        ISSN: 1748-3107


  3 in total

1.  Assistive Technology Use and Provision During COVID-19: Results From a Rapid Global Survey.

Authors:  Emma M Smith; Maria Luisa Toro Hernandez; Ikenna D Ebuenyi; Elena V Syurina; Giulia Barbareschi; Krista L Best; Jamie Danemayer; Ben Oldfrey; Nuha Ibrahim; Catherine Holloway; Malcolm MacLachlan
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2022-06-01

2.  Access to assistive technology in two Southern African countries.

Authors:  Rebecca A Matter; Arne H Eide
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Estimating need and coverage for five priority assistive products: a systematic review of global population-based research.

Authors:  Jamie Danemayer; Dorothy Boggs; Vinicius Delgado Ramos; Emma Smith; Ariana Kular; William Bhot; Felipe Ramos-Barajas; Sarah Polack; Cathy Holloway
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2022-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.