Literature DB >> 25006693

Exploring intended infant feeding decisions among low-income women.

Kelly K Gurka1, Paige P Hornsby, Emily Drake, Evan M Mulvihill, Emily N Kinsey, Miheret S Yitayew, Claire Lauer, Sharon Corriveau, Valerie Coleman, Guari Gulati, Ann L Kellams.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low-income women have the lowest rates of breastfeeding in the United States. Greater understanding of factors that predict intention to feed artificial breastmilk substitute is needed to inform the design and timing of interventions to promote breastfeeding among vulnerable women. This study aimed to identify demographic and reproductive characteristics and other factors associated with intent to feed artificial breastmilk substitute among low-income women.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 520 low-income women interviewed at 24-41 weeks of gestation during enrollment in a prenatal breastfeeding education intervention study were analyzed. Participant characteristics, reasons for feeding decision, and sources and types of information received were compared among women intending to feed only artificial breastmilk substitute and other women.
RESULTS: Most participants (95%) had already chosen an infant feeding method at the time of interview. There were no differences in plans to return to work by feeding plan. Women reporting intention to feed only artificial breastmilk substitute were less likely to report receiving information about the benefits of breastfeeding, how to breastfeed, and pumps and were more likely to cite personal preference and convenience as reasons for their decision. Women were more likely to intend to feed artificial breastmilk substitute if they had a previous live birth or had not breastfed a child, including the most recent.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest breastfeeding promotion should target women early and include sensitive, effective ways to promote breastfeeding among women who have not previously successfully breastfed. Breastfeeding history should be elicited, and plans to pump should be supported prenatally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25006693     DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2014.0013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breastfeed Med        ISSN: 1556-8253            Impact factor:   1.817


  6 in total

1.  Validation of the Infant Feeding Beliefs Questionnaire (IFBQ) among pregnant African- American women and their study partners.

Authors:  Amanda L Thompson; Heather Wasser; Margaret E Bentley
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.868

2.  The Impact of Prenatal Lectures in Breastfeeding and Neonatal Care in Romania - Our Experience.

Authors:  Anca Maria Balasoiu; Mihai-Daniel Dinu; Gabriel-Petre Gorecki; Romina-Marina Sima; Liana Ples
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2022-06

3.  ABM Clinical Protocol #19: Breastfeeding Promotion in the Prenatal Setting, Revision 2015.

Authors:  Casey Rosen-Carole; Scott Hartman
Journal:  Breastfeed Med       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Qualitative exploration of perceived barriers of exclusive breastfeeding among pregnant teenagers in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana.

Authors:  Angela Kwartemaa Acheampong; Makombo Ganga-Limando; Lydia Aziato
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 4.135

5.  A Multilevel Approach to Breastfeeding Promotion: Using Healthy Start to Deliver Individual Support and Drive Collective Impact.

Authors:  Chelsey Leruth; Jacqueline Goodman; Brian Bragg; Dara Gray
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-12

6.  Meeting breastfeeding intentions differ by race/ethnicity, Infant and Toddler Feeding Practices Study-2.

Authors:  Heather C Hamner; Jennifer L Beauregard; Ruowei Li; Jennifer M Nelson; Cria G Perrine
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.092

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.